- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Deltalina[edit]
- Deltalina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The notability of this BLP is questionable. Many statements are unsourced, and many sources in this article are unreliable (blogs, forums, YouTube, etc.) Does a former airline safety video presenter really warrant its own article? sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 06:22, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:15, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - I can see if there is continuing commentary. There were a bunch of articles about it back when her first video debuted. If I find in-depth analysis, especially that made years after the video, I'll say Keep. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Sovereign Sentinel: I checked Google Books and found some commentary here:
- Bogost, Ian. How to Do Things With Videogames (Volume 38 of Electronic mediations). University of Minnesota Press, 2011. ISBN 145293312X, 9781452933122. p. 143
- He refers to media mentions in Wired and makes a comment comparing Deltalina to the Pan Am era. What do you think?
- WhisperToMe (talk) 23:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Sovereign Sentinel: I checked Google Books and found some commentary here:
- Keep: Martin, Grant. "United's New Safety Video Helps Turn A Page In Airline Marketing Strategy." Forbes. August 4, 2014. "Delta was the first carrier to user the legacies into the next generation of safety video largely helped by the talents of Deltalina, the finger-wagging flight attendant that both chided and fascinated the traveling publc. Published in 2008, Deltalina’s video has since surged to over 3.2M views on Youtube. Virgin America’s dance number, by contrast, has earned 9.7M views since its October 2013 launch."
- This indicates continuing coverage.
- WhisperToMe (talk) 21:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I agree that this "indicates continuing coverage" so I say keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nrwairport (talk • contribs) 01:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 Talk 13:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 Talk 13:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Don't really think that it is notable on it's own - would be better as a short passage on the Delta Air Lines page. GeorgeGriffiths (talk) 11:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Check the criteria for notability WP:N -- this is notable. Keizers (talk) 23:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 23:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 23:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep – adequate coverage in reliable sources, notability guidelines met.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.