The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 01:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ariel Horn[edit]

Ariel Horn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Fails WP:BASIC. Almost no coverage in reliable sources.
• Fails WP:ANYBIO. Has not been nominated or won a well-known and significant award or honor; has not made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in her specific field.
• Fails WP:AUTHOR. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I can't agree with "almost no coverage": her 2004 book was reviewed/covered in The Jerusalem Post [1], The Forward [2], Newsday [3], Publishers Weekly [4], Wall Street Journal [5], and more. That may not be enough to show author notability, however. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - WSJ, Jerusalem Post reviews for a HarpersCollins books are sufficient for AUTHOR for me; other reviews add to the multiple independent coverage criterion. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 01:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep I added a few more references. She's reviewed in Booklist and Publishers Weekly. I formatted the article so it reads better, too. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete One book, no awards, no bestseller list. PW and Booklist review thousands of books a year and do short and not very analytic reviews. REf #3 has short quotes from a Ariel Levenson -- perhaps her maiden name? -- but it's not about her. Ref #4 is about her sister, doesn't mention her. Book held in less than 200 libraries on WorldCat. Unless a book is a complete runaway hit (cf To Kill a Mockingbird) I think we shouldn't give notability to one-book authors. LaMona (talk) 03:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• LaMona, I take your point, except, the sources are there. I guess the idea of a novel - said to be a funny novel - about a soon-to-be Ivy League grad desperately in need of a job but with few actual, employable skills hit a nerve - because boy did she get interviewed in major places: Newsday, the Wall Street Journal. And a book review in the New York Times - one of their brief reviews, you know, the ones that run about 5 column inches, but, still, a review for a first novel. True, it's only one novel. But the sourcing is there.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep ran an Proquest news archive search and came up with a lot of hits, interviews, coverage of her career, book reviews. Plenty of sources to pass WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please add some links to all these sources? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added some newspaper profiles and the book review that ran in the NYTimes.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete - One book? Sounds pretty sketchy to me in terms of notability. Maybe we can bring the article back if more info comes up and/or another book written by her is released. Parsley Man (talk) 02:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - It's difficult to verify most of the sources, as most require a paid subscription. We're left with a few book reviews, and almost nothing written about her (not about her one book). Magnolia677 (talk) 03:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Magnolia677 We count sources like the ones I added from the news archive search Proquest. They are valid and carry the same weight as sources that are open access. And remember that searches are never complete, even with a good search engine, there are always more sources out there. If someone familiar with her work and career was working on this, they would undoubtedly know of more material. I merely stopped by while looking through a list of AFDs. I did not take the time to rewrite / expand the article with the biographical details in the sources I found, or to write up a better description of the book and what the reviewers have said about it. The articles/ profiles that ran as the book was coming out in fact have a great deal of detail about her life and the job-hunting struggles that led her to write the book. "almost nothing written about her" is not accurate; extensive material about her exists, much in the sources I added. And the reviews we have now located include one in the New York Times. The article still needs expansion, improvement. But the sources found establish notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• There is also coverage of her teaching career, winning an award: [6]; [7]; [8] under her married name, Ariel Levenson.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Magnolia677, I am doing a rewrite using a number of password-protected sources. articles sourced to Proquest are not "deadlinks" - they are paywalled. I can wish that there were no paywalls - it certainly would make it easier to evaluate articles, but articles do not have to be freely availabailabe to be valid.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:38, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.