Tech News: 2020-45
16:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Tech News: 2020-46
15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Tech News: 2020-47
15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Please check the "Talk" page related to this submission, as I have been working with another person regarding approval of this and explained the movement forward of this submission there. There appears to also be confusion related to the citations as being purely self-promotional vs. actual episodes and materials being cited inside the article (the citations are not Facebook posts and Twitter tweets per se, but video content with information relevant to the statements made). It seems bizarre that a podcast that has been around for over 12 years with 274 episodes and over 2,000,000 listens/views in that time is being rejected as irrelevant, especially based on further citations that have been included today. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSpaTruthSquad (talk • contribs) 20:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- If the submission is not ready, then don’t submit it, I fail to see the issue here.--Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 20:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Rossif76 submitted originally but realized the COI rules and sent it to me to review and resubmit. Changes have subsequently been made. Another reviewer and I have been going back and forth about it, and he made further edits after I added 20 additional citations, and made several adjustments to the text. It is ready for review and deserves approval at this point. I have never seen an article with 26 citations rejected, especially when most are external. I'm not sure why you placed the note on my talk page about using the signature since I did sign my original note to you here. BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Tech News: 2020-48
17:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Is speedy deletion of Draft:Poob appropriate?
Its a draft, but it looks like blatant vandalism. 4thfile4thrank {talk} :? 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)