Hello, ZennonTheOne, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get that. However, I had to make a new account because I lost my main account. ZennonTheOne (talk) 12:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was the name of that account? Doug Weller talk 18:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

gamingwithcuyler3 ZennonTheOne (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Christian privilege have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Christian privilege was changed by ZennonTheOne (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880594 on 2024-01-12T00:15:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You have removed sourced content from Right-wing terrorism, started an edit war over the removal, and blatantly POV-pushed on the January 6 United States Capitol attack page, including modifying direct quotes out-of-line with the source text. These topics are contentious topics, as outlined in the official notification above, so any continuation of these behaviors will be brought up to WP:AE. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at FBI search of Mar-a-Lago. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

-- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 18:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You started out by posting racist crap like this, reverting the anti-vandalism bot here — a very poor idea — and have continued by removing big slabs of sourced content and edit warring to keep it removed. Bishonen | tålk 19:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]