Archives

January–October 2007

Great work on the Palin travel articles! One thing: You might want to copy edit the book articles to remove book review-like statements (e.g. "Not bad, considering that Palin was 60 years old at the time."). Other than that, they're great. I'll see if I can have a look around for some material on critical reaction to the books for you. Brad 19:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brad, thank you for the "good work", that warms.

On the other hand, I'm rather peeved at you systematically editing out some of the "POV" things I happened to write in these articles. To me contributing to Wikipedia is a hobby, and the pleasure I get out of it is in part being able to do things "my way". I realize that someone else can come along and change things to be more "his/her way", and that's OK if it is part of a contribution that adds additional content and results in greater combined value. I don't like it when someone just systematically removes things that indicate that the author was actually a real person with opinions, and not just a fact-collecting robot.

Wikipedia encourages contributions from everyone, so I think it should be acceptable that the result reflects that "everyone" does have a point of view, even though this results in articles that are not entirely 100% fact-based. The alternative is something so bland that it is not interesting.

I'm sure this has been debated thousands of times and that the consensus is against me. --RenniePet 18:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC) --RenniePet 02:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- Feel free to add that to your userpage if you wish. Great job on the article! If you haven't already done so, consider helping out with a review at WP:GAC. I am going to make a habit myself of trying to review at least two Good Article Candidates for each one I nominate. Cheers. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 21:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

• You are most welcome. I am curious, do you review WP:GACs as well? I know for me it can be a teensy bit intimidating before I jump in and read the article and check it with the criterion, but then you just have to sort of do it. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 00:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]
  • Good points. On a different note - I see that you have become proficient at getting "TV-related articles" to GA status. Want to help me with a couple? Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 01:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

On 20 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Spencer Campbell, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri (talk) 20:08, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On November 20, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vinette Robinson, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you are able to track down print sources easily, but I've compiled some resources for you at User:Erik/Insomnia. Hope you can make use of them! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you nominated Cold Feet (series 5) for Good Article status and I have reviewed the article. I just placed it "On Hold" and left some notes on the article Talk Page. They are mostly just minor fixes and once done the article should pass easily. If you work on it and have any questions about my assessment please feel free to ask on the talk page there or my talk page. Good luck. Phydend 04:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

- I've just reviewed the article again and everything looks great now so I passed it. Good job and congratulations. Phydend 16:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, just stopping by to thank you for sorting the images from William Gibson's "The X-Files" episodes. Skomorokh ^incite 18:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Identifying a fictional character is a standard acceptable fair use. The actor's resemblance to the character has no bearing on this. - auburnpilot talk 18:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. In the context of the current flux over sorting out what should belong here and what is better situated elsewhere (eg. wikia), disagreement is inevitable and healthy and I regret again if I came across as cavalier - I realise some of my comments were perhaps overly brusque, but am happy that you haven't impugned my good faith too much. I certainly didn't mean to make a genuine disagreement anything more than that. Eusebeus (talk) 03:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support and suggestions on Press Gang. The JPS^{talk to me} 12:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would not the opening line use "was" instead of "is". From a quick skim over before (when I made the edit), it seemed to be a one-off distribution and it was produced in the past. So wouldn't "was" be appropriate? Regards, — Rudget _speak.work 20:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to include you in my list, even with my caveat. That was presumptuous and I apologise. Eusebeus (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brad: I did a brief review of the article; I'll try to add more re: the content if I get a chance over the holidays. MeegsC | Talk 12:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well.. none :) But with all these stuff we can create a cool one. Cheers. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is relevent because it provides people with info on what stations and series of the show have been shown in different countries. There are plently of other show pages that have the same thing. You gunna deleate all off them because there "not relevent"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammera (talk • contribs) 17:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't bother. The admin will have you banned if you continue to deleate information that does not need deleating. You also made changes to the Waterloo Road page aswell - changes to the DVD section that did not need deleating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammera (talk • contribs) 17:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammera (talk • contribs) 17:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your questions for this episode...I'm assuming they are to improve it for the GAC. Ok, I fixed number 2. As for number 1, they just said the film, and since I've never seen it, I can't verify if it is one scene or the entire movie. And I'm confused as to what your asking on number 3. Are you saying it violates POV to list what he thinks about it? Ctjf83 ^talk 19:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you ever do GACs, or were you just being helpful? I just deleted the "regrettably" (which I guess I could have done to begin with), since I didn't even add that in anyway Ctjf83 ^talk 21:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than just stating 'Wrong' concerning having a picture on the above article, perhaps you would be kind enough to explain why you hold this opinion? Paste (talk) 10:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.

At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars

If you are interested by all means feel free to join

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 20:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I love the phrase "royally-inclined"! Yeah, I will be watching the programme, so I'm happy to help where time allows.--UpDown (talk) 08:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did watch it, and to my surprise enjoyed it. I keep meaning to add the episode summary for episode 1, but haven't got round to it yet.--UpDown (talk) 08:01, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. --Maniwar (talk) 19:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya — I noticed you've been editing The Palace (TV series) — do you reckon we could maintain an individual page for each episode? I've written an extended summary at my sandbox, so please do take a look, and if you want, a fiddle — I daresay if we decide to go ahead it'd need a serious curtailment! (P.S. I've posted this to UpDown too) DBD 02:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for going to the trouble of addressing my comments. Many wouldn't. Most appreciated.

• a) What's wrong with the flag icons?
  • They go against the manual of style laid out at WP:FLAG, specifically Wikipedia:FLAG#Not for use in locations of birth and death: "The use of flag icons in the birth and death information in a biographical article's introduction and/or infobox is strongly deprecated"

Fair enough.

• b) It's not JUST his pen name
  • My mistake

I'm glad there's at least one thing you agreed with  ;-)

• c) Yes, he's Welsh, but "Welsh Television Producer" implies he only produces "Welsh television", which is clearly not the case.
  • No it doesn't. "[[Welsh people|Welsh]] television producer" implies that he is a Welsh person who produces television. "[[Welsh television]] producer" would have the effect you are thinking of.

Well yes, but ...
I should have been more precise and said, "it's ambiguous - it could be interpreted as television producer from Wales and/or producer of Welsh television.
I agree that when placed next to each other as in your explanation, the difference is more obvious, but when presented separately, it's not quite so obvious. (i.e. when viewed, the only difference is whether the word "television" is in blue or black font.)
I can live with what you've changed it back to, (but I still feel it's slightly ambiguous).

• It is standard form to have "Subject of article (born on date) is a <nationality> <occupation>..." in the lead of biographical articles.

Fair enough.

Brad (talk) 00:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 05:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 04:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you'll see from the top of this very page, Brad has retired DBD 14:17, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Bill titles.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Brothers & Sisters title card.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:The Bill titles.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ZooFari 00:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:21 Jump Street title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Heartbeat title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2003 Mastermind title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Weeds title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Roswell title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:24, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ab Fab series 5 title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Break up.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of Cold Feet know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on March 28, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or one of his delegates (Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs)), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 28, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Cold Feet is a British comedy-drama television series that ran from 1988 to 2003. It was created by Mike Bullen as a follow-up to his 1997 one-off comedy of the same name. The series, set and largely filmed in Greater Manchester, follows three couples experiencing the ups-and-downs of romance. Adam Williams and Rachel Bradley (James Nesbitt and Helen Baxendale) are a new couple who go through dating, marriage and the birth of a child. Pete and Jenny Gifford (John Thomson and Fay Ripley) experience parenthood, adultery, separation and divorce. Karen and David Marsden (Hermione Norris and Robert Bathurst) live an upper-middle-class lifestyle, but their marriage disintegrates after each has an affair. The show was a critical and ratings success. Critics analysed the depiction of social issues, the use of popular music, and the relevance of the series to contemporary audiences compared to big-budget BBC costume dramas. The series was a regular nominee at the British Comedy Awards, the National Television Awards and elsewhere. It has been broadcast in over 30 countries and has been remade for local audiences in the United States and European countries. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Armstrong and Miller Show logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Friends titles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Diane Beck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:ENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Agtx (talk) 01:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kingdom title card.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Silent Witness title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maylord Shopping Centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maylord Shopping Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 13:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Eleventh Hour title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Joey title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cold Feet titles.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Will & Grace title card.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nighty Night title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Heartbeat title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Party of Five title card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 21:34, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]