Hi can you provide me with a citation for (May 1915, 2nd Battle of Givenchy) I cannot seem to find anything on it. It is not listed here: Listology Thank you. Green Squares (talk) 02:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, hope you write it soon! Green Squares (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you catching that. I must have made an error in the input and noted 1918 instead of 1916 (which is clearly demonstrated in the photo). I have updated the photo with the information you provided. Good job! --Labattblueboy (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's nothing personal, it's simply how Wikipedia has set out its content policies. With regards to image galleries, for greater detail please see: Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Image_galleries. I would personally suggest either inserting images in appropriate sub-sections or uploading them to Wikipedia Commons. The Wikipedia Commons is considered the image repository while Wikipedia proper is not. I created a category in the commons specifically for the memorial a while back to make the process easier. let me know if I can help in any other capacity.--Labattblueboy (talk) 15:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect the only Canadian WWI memorial where a gallery would be applicable would be the Vimy Memorial, and only because of the numerous statues and features. This was the case for including a gallery for the Fountain of Time memorial. National War Memorial (South Australia) used it to show adjacent memorials and South African War Memorial (South Australia) bronze plaques which are mounted on the memorial. I'm not opposed to image galleries but they must have some purpose and in emphasizing or supporting existing written material and certainly more that a single image. Please take notice that the image has been included in the article as there is not sufficent written material to permit so.--Labattblueboy (talk) 04:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Richmond Hill HS COA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Richmond Hill HS COA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]