Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sex worker have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sex worker was changed by Volkan1881 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953596 on 2021-09-14T11:47:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sex worker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 18:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

porn actors are sex workers too! Volkan1881 (talk) 12:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what this warning about? Volkan1881 (talk) 17:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vulcan. Looking over the Lawrence Gordan section on the Saw characters I have a few pointers in mind. first off there are no sources in that section and it will need to be expanded with reliable sources (i.e. books, interviews etc.) and in your own words. do that and you will get on track. Just try to not to do nonconstructive edits or edits that might be intrusive to the article itself. Anyways goodluck on the editing mate!--- Paleface Jack (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no problem but thanks for advice Volkan1881 (talk) 18:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ı just want hear one think ı can crate any character from movies,comics or video game no limit for this rigth? Volkan1881 (talk) 18:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and why fictional characters writted in wiki do not misunderstand me

ı don't problem with that and according to what

this character pages stay on wiki? Volkan1881 (talk) 18:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop restoring years-old versions of this article without explaining your edits; it's very disruptive. Each of your edits has been contested, so per WP:BRD you need to open a discussion at Talk:Sex worker and seek consensus for your large-scale changes first. DanCherek (talk) 15:03, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sex worker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PrisonerB (talk) 15:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

then teach me the rules asshole Volkan1881 (talk) 15:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. PrisonerB (talk) 15:42, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorry ı don't know rules of wikipedia and other editors disrespect my edits Volkan1881 (talk) 15:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you make good edits, you will be respected.PrisonerB (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

but ı don't know rulessss! Volkan1881 (talk) 15:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and everything it links to.PrisonerB (talk) 16:03, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok ok Volkan1881 (talk) 16:03, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Volkan1881 reported by User:DanCherek (Result: ). Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

do what ever you do man ı don't care Volkan1881 (talk) 18:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

volkan ben geldim 94.54.21.13 (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HOŞGELDİN Volkan1881 (talk) 12:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See wp:Articles for deletion/The Postal Dude. Closed as redirect. Adakiko (talk) 11:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Postal Dude shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ım not doing edit war Volkan1881 (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

and plase don't do undo my edit plase thank you Volkan1881 (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Volkan1881 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 19:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you don't so polite when delete my postal dude edit Volkan1881 (talk) 20:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 20:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• You have e-mailed me twice recently. If you do so again, I will disable e-mail access.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Because you sent me another e-mail, which, this time, was abusive and vulgar, I've revoked TPA and disabled e-mail.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]