Hello, I'm Dawnseeker2000. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Jimmy Savile, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dawnseeker2000 19:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ian Watkins (Lostprophets). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you.

Re: Your edit at Anti-fascism. Please remember NPOV. I'd remind you that "bullying and intimidating people of opposite or vastly contrasting ideals" does not make a group Fascist or like Fascists, as these things are not exclusive to Fascism,but can be tactics used by all groups. AnarchoGhost (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Megan Is Missing has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Megan Is Missing was changed by Vickers616 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913049 on 2015-07-20T13:19:20+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:19, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Versageek 21:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Carbon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah was proving a point forgot to change it back Vickers616 (talk) 01:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Anti-fascism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 15:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]