Welcome!

Hello, Unioneagle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Edit test, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Btilm  02:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Btilm  02:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Unioneagle, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Eve Gentry - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 04:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Can someone teach me how to post diffs?--Unioneagle (talk) 21:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Unioneagle, thank you for your interest in our encyclopedia. To review differences, click the "history" tab, select the two revisions you wish to compare and click "Compare selected revisions". Let me know if you have trouble with this or have further questions by asking here. Thanks,  IShadowed  ✰  21:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you just want the diff for a particular edit, another way is: in the page history, look for the edit concerned, and right-click on "(prev)" at the left of that line. On the menu that pops up, left-click "Copy Link Location". That will put onto your clip-board a link to the diff, which you can paste to where you want it. See also Help:Diff. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{adminhelp}} If someone posts references to a article that has a copyright infringement, as someone did to this article, should it be speedily deleted?Unioneagle (talk) 01:38, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That article can be deleted because it is a copyright infringement of said website/ webpage. The content is an issue because it may have been copied and pasted into the article.  IShadowed  ✰  01:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict):Yes. References do not make it a not-copyvio. All copyvios should be deleted regardless, or moved out of the mainspace so that the infringing material may be removed. Also, you don't really need the adminhelp template for this; anyone can tag for speedy deletion, and an admin will delete the article soon enough.  fetchcomms☛ 01:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'd like to inform you that I've reviewed some of your NPP activities at Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at CSD/Lankiveil. Happy for you to post any feedback that you might have either there or on my talk page. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Message removed; this user was only notified because of an apparent glitch in the article history.

Hi, I saw your comment on my talk page. I'm not sure what you mean, since you clearly created the article Medley Syndrome. Am I mistaken about that? It's in your history. And if you did create it but it isn't a hoax, feel free to explain why. --Glenfarclas (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you're absolutely right as I just noticed. Must have been some sort of glitch where you were shown as the earliest contributor to the article -- Twinkle placed the notice automatically, and when I looked at your history it showed up with an N. --Glenfarclas (talk) 02:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} How can I create a template that directs users to the citing help pages and to avoid citation errors. an exampleUnioneagle (talk) 01:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know what you mean here, but if you are talking about posting it to the Article, it would be pointless, because I personally when I am on try and go through all the cite errors. But if you are talking about a user talk template, it would be best to start it at Special:MyPage/Template:Your title. Then you could put there the warning boxes, messages or notes that you would want users to see. Let me know if you need additional help. --MWOAP (talk) 01:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unioneagle. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 20:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Thing _{Vandalize me} 21:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you warned me for removing the image of the dildo here? I see you're fairly new to using Huggle-and Rollback in general- please slow down and think about what you are doing when using that powerful of a tool. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 21:47, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thankyou for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Much appreciated! :) Orphan Wiki 22:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Still learning how to not click the wrong buttons. Using the keyboard instead of the mouse sure does help! --Unioneagle (talk) 22:54, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

^ Ditto the barnstar. Appreciated. Paralympiakos (talk) 23:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not blaming you personally for this, as it's a bot that has picked this up, but what has just happened is an absolute disgrace.

I uploaded content on Signed_Sealed_Delivered_(Craig_David_album) ALL of which is in the public domain, and linked to OFFICIAL sources.

Your bot then told me I couldn't because the text contains copyrighted material. When you click the link it claims I am copying it is an ILLEGAL blog! To make matters worse, it contains an illegally uploaded file of Craig David's new single.

This link is at the top of the Wiki page for the album. It's basically advertising a free illegal download. This needs to be changed like yesterday, it is absolutely ridiculous! --NickHSpurs (talk) 00:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you contested the PROD, I have taken the above article to AfD. You are welcome to improve the article (by finding sources which I was unable to - and it has been unsourced since it was created in 2006) and/or participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naoki Sano. Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:29, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding sourced material to this article that you don't like doesn't constitute disruption or vandalism.--Drrll (talk) 02:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've got (e)mail. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. --Unioneagle (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock #1870701 lifted or expired. Request handled by:  Sandstein  Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Hello Unioneagle. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of MaxNormal.tv, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: precusor to notable band. Thank you. Kimchi.sg (talk) 01:36, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I declined this one, based on assertion of coverage in multiple sources. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, looks like you've got two AfDs opened for this. 28bytes (talk) 02:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I found that too. I have now cleaned this up, and deleted one of the two. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your email. Thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]