Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
5,310		Calvin Harris (talk)						Add sources
153		FKM (talk)						Add sources
306		Viton (talk)						Add sources
562		Wilmington, Delaware (talk)						Add sources
13		Francis Gurney du Pont (talk)						Add sources
15		Eights Week (talk)						Add sources
112		Autoclave (industrial) (talk)						Cleanup
14		Akrura (talk)						Cleanup
239		Imperial Chemical Industries (talk)						Cleanup
103		Hogtie (talk)						Expand
67		Conoco (talk)						Expand
120		Fashion blog (talk)						Expand
52		Atascadero State Hospital (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
259		Islamic Principlism in Iran (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
729		Gothic fiction (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
311		Allergan (talk)						Merge
204		Boston Strangler (talk)						Merge
14		Advanced fiber placement (talk)						Merge
123		C.C. (Code Geass) (talk)						Wikify
186		Timeline of major crimes in Australia (talk)						Wikify
395		Swing music (talk)						Wikify
27		Major aortopulmonary collateral artery (talk)						Orphan
106		Lenskart (talk)						Orphan
3		Sally Steele (talk)						Orphan
14		Eugene du Pont (talk)						Stub
5		Cambridge University Combined Boat Clubs (talk)						Stub
2		Reynaldo Galindo Pohl (talk)						Stub
28		Aethlon Medical (talk)						Stub
47		1001 Inventions and the World of Ibn Al-Haytham (talk)						Stub
5		Kon Hoeel Marathi Crorepati (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi ukexpat, just as a heads up, there is apparently someone claiming that they are you and offering to edit Draft:Blueprint Earth for money. I am in the process of gathering more information from that individual (the OP is on Facebook), but I thought I should let you know before the wolves come calling. Primefac (talk) 20:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks - that's not the first time. I have an e-mail from a similar (may be the same) imposter promising they wouldn't do it again. Happy to send it to anyone who needs to see it. I have, with difficulty, refrained from responding on the Facebook thread so as not to out myself.--ukexpat (talk) 20:49, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Refresh the thread, just to make sure that hasn't happened... Primefac (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

	Hello, Ukexpat. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Bananasoldier (talk) 02:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Uxepat. :) Just wanted to let you know that I've blanked the bulk of that article for copyright problems. I didn't want to take action on the speedy concerns because it was brought to my attention as a problem on my user page, and I feared I might be predisposed. I try not to mix my copyright hat with other hats. Anyway, I tried to make clear in edit summary that I have no objection to speedy deletion, but if the speedy is declined for any reason want to be sure that the copyvio leaves publication unless we get permission. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:18, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Good call, it looked copyvioish to me too.-ukexpat (talk) 22:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for mispelling your name! I've always kind of pronounced "Uxepat" in my head and have only just now made the "Oh, THAT'S what that means!" connection. :D Well, better late than never. :/ --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 23:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

LOL!--ukexpat (talk) 00:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Galaxygirl0505 (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi in your article "Apostille Convention" you listed Thailand as a party to convention since 2002 which is wrong. Thailand IS NOT a party at all. plz modify — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.229.116.92 (talk) 16:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

It's not my article. If it's wrong, please fix it.-ukexpat (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ukexpat -- you recently made an edit to Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. in which you changed the second and third mention of Justice Antonin Scalia to just "Scalia" (without the word "Justice" preceding his name). I was wondering if you could direct me to a section in the MOS that recommends referring to judges (or other similarly situated individuals) by their last name alone?

In most scholarly publications in legal academia, Supreme Court justices (and other judges in lower courts) are almost always referred to "Justice Smith," "Justice Jones," or "Judge McDonald," even if they have been mentioned earlier in the article. See, for example, this article. Consequently, I I think the term "Justice" likely falls into the category of terms that are "so commonly attached to" names in scholarship that they should be used every time the article refers to that individual. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 16:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

By analogy with WP:HONORIFIC and WP:LASTNAME? Maybe a better place to discuss it is WT:LAW.--ukexpat (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

I hadn't seen WP:LASTNAME until just now, but that is certainly informative. I'll go ahead and start a discussion at WT:LAW. Thanks for your response! Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
6		Cambridge University Women's Boat Club (talk)						Add sources
3		Homerton College Boat Club (talk)						Add sources
4		Pembroke College Boat Club (Oxford) (talk)						Add sources
213		DeWalt (talk)						Add sources
357		Agilent Technologies (talk)						Add sources
75		Freeway Killer (talk)						Add sources
67		KazMunayGas (talk)						Cleanup
26		Avenger Penguins (talk)						Cleanup
95		Universal Health Services (talk)						Cleanup
145		Dog Whisperer with Cesar Millan (talk)						Expand
8		Chinese Canadians in the Greater Toronto Area (talk)						Expand
60		Intrade (talk)						Expand
9		Trainer (TV series) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
11		Lady Mina (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
41		A Rock Star Bucks a Coffee Shop (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
242		Pickup artist (talk)						Merge
26		Conference management system (talk)						Merge
107		Multiple-alarm fire (talk)						Merge
4		Dan Power (talk)						Wikify
2,201		Socrates (talk)						Wikify
12		Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium (talk)						Wikify
1		Plasma fusion preface (talk)						Orphan
5		Digvijay Singh Pariyar (talk)						Orphan
13		Sara Laing (talk)						Orphan
166		Manny Lewis (talk)						Stub
1		Royal Variety Charity (talk)						Stub
8		Titanic: The Complete Story (talk)						Stub
3		Caesar Andrade Faini (talk)						Stub
3		Nicasio Safadi (talk)						Stub
1		XIII Constitutional Government of São Tomé and Príncipe (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Kirkwood829 (talk) 05:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC) I have read over several messages from your talk. I get several issues would like to discuss with you. As Mr.Wang’s very close and long-time friend, only me who has opportunities of follow his experience in both US and China for decades, and also only me who is able to understand the languages that introduced him in both English and Chinese, this is the reason, I has initialized the article and been kept it updated. I think it would be more beneficial to keep the article alive and to continue improve it for better. I feel there has a few reasons: At first, Wang’s story have been continually appeared in a number of TV program, book, magazine; journal; records in Chinese since 1980s of last century. Those information presented in the article all can be verified from public resources. Secondly, because his unique life story from a country boy to be a scholar is considered as a miniature and epitome of a Chinese history period that communist has ruled for more than last 60 years. Thirdly, Wang’s experience from a bio-scientist to bio-related entrepreneur, is the products of the times, that reflects and somehow represents the trend of the times and the tendency of 21st century’s industry development; thirdly Wang spent a half time of his life in china and another half in America, he is a kind of symbolic figure for millions of American Chinese who contributed to both country and he is a good example of the United States as a national,culture and idea melting pot for people who coming from all over the world. Fourthly, since the article lunched in 2010, it has been 6 years,and during this period, I can see from the view history where has more 20 editors whom you might be included, had appreciable time to correct it, improve it and make it better and better. A deletion is a simple and quick action, but it would waste all those valuable efforts and precious time. At last, I found that your last modification has removed the most controversial paragraphs which I had added a few days ago, and so the article already returned to the before that the version has existed 6 years. In future, if I intend to add more details, I should very carefully to follow the rules and policies of Wikipedia and write it neutrally and professionally. Sincerely, Kirkwood829.

I have read over several messages from your talk. I get several issues would like to discuss with you. As Mr.Wang’s very close and long-time friend, only me who has opportunities of follow his experience in both US and China for decades, and also only me who is able to understand the languages that introduced him in both English and Chinese, this is the reason, I has initialized the article and been kept it updated. I think it would be more beneficial to keep the article alive and to continue improve it for better. I feel there has a few reasons: At first, Wang’s story have been continually appeared in a number of TV program, book, magazine; journal; records in Chinese since 1980s of last century. Those information presented in the article all can be verified from public resources. Secondly, because his unique life story from a country boy to be a scholar is considered as a miniature and epitome of a Chinese history period that communist has ruled for more than last 60 years. Thirdly, Wang’s experience from a bio-scientist to bio-related entrepreneur, is the products of the times, that reflects and somehow represents the trend of the times and the tendency of 21st century’s industry development; thirdly Wang spent a half time of his life in china and another half in America, he is a kind of symbolic figure for millions of American Chinese who contributed to both country and he is a good example of the United States as a national,culture and idea melting pot for people who coming from all over the world. Fourthly, since the article lunched in 2010, it has been 6 years,and during this period, I can see from the view history where has more 20 editors whom you might be included, had appreciable time to correct it, improve it and make it better and better. A deletion is a simple and quick action, but it would waste all those valuable efforts and precious time. At last, I found that your last modification has removed the most controversial paragraphs which I had added a few days ago, and so the article already returned to the before that the version has existed 6 years. In future, if I intend to add more details, I should very carefully to follow the rules and policies of Wikipedia and write it neutrally and professionally. Sincerely, Kirkwood829.

Please make your comments in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William X. Wang.--ukexpat (talk) 12:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Where I can post my message in the box of the comments in the deletion discussion? I am not sure if I just did is right. Please give me a guild. thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirkwood829 (talk • contribs)

You already have done.--ukexpat (talk) 15:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I had Fiveer do it and they sent me the draft with the note it had been submitted with photos etc! help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterhemming3 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

I've explained at the Help Desk what needs to be done to submit it. It is much easier if whoever drafted it adds the "submit" code.--ukexpat (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors August 2015 Newsletter July drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 24 people who signed up, 17 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. August blitz: The one-week April blitz, targeting biographical articles that have been tagged for copy editing for over a year, will run from August 16–22. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the article list on the blitz page. Sign up here! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, KieranTribe, Miniapolis, and Pax85. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

sent by Jonesey95 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello ukexpat, I'm not sure if you were just helping out by adding a talkpage-template where it belonged, or if you had some interest in the article-topic, but just in case you care, the wp-coi-request got fulfilled, and I think the right CEO is in place. I also ran a quick skim-scan copy-edit. Thanks, 75.108.94.227 (talk) 02:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi there,

thank you for the welcome. I tried reading up on the references part but since the text is translated it is going to be difficult to use the German books as reference I assume? Any tips on how to get this solved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank Moeckel (talk • contribs) 17:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi there,

I have a question related to the following article: Helmut Möckel (soccer player) I have referenced the article as good as I could, is there a chance you could take a look at it to see why I am still getting the warning about citations?

Thank you! Frank Frank Moeckel (talk) 18:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Maintenance templates are not added or removed automatically, they can be manually removed when the issue(s) has been dealt with. In this case we would like to see a few more references - I had to remove the reference citing the German Wikipedia - we cannot use Wikipedia as a reference. I also made some clean up edits to conform to the English Wikipedia's manual of style. You need to look at the beginning of the second paragraph - I think something got lost in translation.--ukexpat (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

I am in the the Communications Office at Ringling College and have edited our page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ringling_College_of_Art_and_Design) twice now, but someone keeps undoing the edits saying they are copyright violation. This is not copyright violation - this came from Ringling College. Please explain how to keep the changes I made. I am making these on behalf of the College and all copy is factual and relevant.

Thanks, Holly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsieglin (talk • contribs) 20:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Please see the reply to your question at the Tea House.-ukexpat (talk) 22:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
47		Getty Square (talk)						Add sources
580		Hybrid vehicle (talk)						Add sources
3		Joseph Conrad International Literature Festival (talk)						Add sources
50		Runtastic (talk)						Add sources
23		DV8 Physical Theatre (talk)						Add sources
21		Hunting Dog (Felids) (talk)						Add sources
6		Eugene List (talk)						Cleanup
743		European debt crisis (talk)						Cleanup
38		New Life Church (Colorado Springs, Colorado) (talk)						Cleanup
92		Individuals and groups assisting Jews during the Holocaust (talk)						Expand
315		Guayaquil (talk)						Expand
2,144		Ecuador (talk)						Expand
40		LightSquared (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
18		Saul Ewing (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
3		Climate Rush (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
54		Food contact materials (talk)						Merge
4		MultiCare Mary Bridge Children's Hospital & Health Center (talk)						Merge
291		Southland Tales (talk)						Merge
1,944		Jessica Ennis-Hill (talk)						Wikify
2		Spelling Bee (card trick) (talk)						Wikify
22		Environmental Health Perspectives (talk)						Wikify
5		Winchester Villages (talk)						Orphan
1		Pedro Álvares Ribeiro do Carmo Pacheco (talk)						Orphan
2		Andrew D. Luster (talk)						Orphan
1		XII Constitutional Government of São Tomé and Príncipe (talk)						Stub
50		Health (application) (talk)						Stub
2		Providence Hospital (Columbia, South Carolina) (talk)						Stub
3		Prince's Rainforests Project (talk)						Stub
17		Arcade Classics (talk)						Stub
1		VanLadyLove (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

I responded to you message in my notes page - thanks David R AustinTx (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi - I think you err on calling Gordon not notable. Maybe you should withdraw the Afd? Collect (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

IMHO appears to be quite notable in the sphere of Buddhist studies. Collect (talk) 23:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I have a new name for editing Wikipedia because I hadn't edited for a while and forgot my password. This had happened once before, so I actually have edited under three names now... Kathryn Klos and Kathrynklos, as well as Squirrelwhisperer. If there's a way to consolidate my names, I'd like that, as I am proud of some of the things I've worked on. But if consolidating things is too complex, I can skip it. Thanks.Squirrelwhisperer (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)