Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Great Cockcrow Railway, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been standing for years and not once there has been any problem with refences. Also note we are not the only page without a referenced loco list so why are we the only ones being TORMENTED about it ? TheBigScaryEditUndoer2005 (talk) 18:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a very general problem across a fair number of articles, which I have done some work in removing. However, editing the GCR page has been particularly tedious, tiring and troublesome due to the consistent refusal to accept that the whole table is a) completely unsourced, and b) the very definition of original research. I hope that answers your question. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Great Cockcrow Railway, you may be blocked from editing. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have been reported for "sockpupeting". WEll excuse me but i can assure you i have not other accounts. I am simply trying to fix the page of the railway im involved with after you and your friends went and completely screwed it up for simply us not encluding a god dam reference ! Its not that deep ! The page has been standing as it was for 12 years and there was never a single problem. ThatItalianGuy05 (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User:Mattdaviesfsic. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Leonidlednev (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 20:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]