Hello, Tdhla1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - wolf 12:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Hi, I'm Cwmhiraeth. Tdhla1, thanks for creating Spirit of Capricorn!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You cannot use Wikipedia as a reference. Please add references to reliable mainstream sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:35, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spirit of Capricorn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirit of Capricorn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reb1981 (talk) 02:06, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Swissair Flight 111, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Adding content such as a drawing of the plane as well as the date it was delivered is not a minor edit. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:47, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced information (the 1996 stuff about the livery) to an article that is highly visible. Separately, the image adds nothing to the article, as there is an image of the actual aircraft that crashed. Do not reinstate the image before discussing the matter at the article's talk.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:05, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit to USS Enterprise (CV-6). I gave a brief edit summary, but if you have any questions, just ask on the article talk page. You can notify me about your post, but that page is on my watchlist so I'll see it anyway. Cheers - wolf 12:13, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air France Flight 072 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air France Flight 072 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Tdhla1 , if you happen to read this (I kinda hope so!) : I can't say much about the deletion (or not) of the article, but I used to edit at Wikinews and this would make a perfect article for there! (I have to admit at the same time, that the place is kinda dead nowadays - at least thats my feeling. But at least you'd keep your article online!) . In principle I would copy it there myself, but the permissions ("licence" in legal speak) are different from the wikipedia to the wikinews (awkward, I know). So you'd have to either do that yourself, or at say here that you're fine with doing that ! Kind regards 37.49.76.172 (talk) 23:49, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you answer here, I'll try to get back to you!

February 26, 2019 2:49 (UTC)

I decided that it would be a good decision for you (37.49.76.172) to add this to wikinews as it would keep the article alive in a way.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from China Airlines to List of China Airlines Accidents and Incidents (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Also, when copying from one article to another, please be sure to properly copy over the citations as well. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sea Power: Naval Combat in the Missile Age has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not yet notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tdhla1--do you want me to move it to draft instead--it gives 6 months. ? DGG ( talk ) 22:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tdhla1 - I believe that it would be better if you moved your new article Sea Power: Naval Combat in the Missile Age to User:Tdhla1/Sandbox1 (and move its talk page with it). That way you could continue to develop it if and when new information comes out. Once it is one of your sandboxes, it would be right for you to remove the PROD template. Toddy1 (talk) 13:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tdhla1

Thank you for creating Carrier Air Wing Fifteen.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1989 United States Navy order of battle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear why the order of battle in this year would be a notable subject. Are there independent, reliable sources actually addressing the 1989 Navy order of battle specifically (e.g. compared to the 1988 and 1990 orders)?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tdhla1

Thank you for creating KTDU-425.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Organization of United States Naval Aviation Units in the Gulf War . However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 02:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited VF-51, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grumman F9F. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know: the way to get an image to sit in the middle of the text without having to use lots of blank lines is to set the "center" attribute, like this: [[File:QUEENSLAND RAIL TILT TRAIN CONSIST (1998).png|alt=The standard formation of Electric Tilt Trains from 6 November 1998.|thumb|center|600x600px|The standard formation of Electric Tilt Trains from 6 November 1998.]]. XAM2175 ^(T) 10:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tdhla1, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Carrier Air Group TEN, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrier Air Group TEN.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Toadspike}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Toadspike (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]