Hello! TH1980, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 04:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Congratulations! You have earned the

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! ~ Anastasia (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hello, TH1980. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 04:58, 16 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

SarahStierch (talk) 04:58, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WhoWhere?, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gunjan K. Sinha, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TH1980. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "WhoWhere?".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/WhoWhere?}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TH1980. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Gunjan K. Sinha".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gunjan K. Sinha}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Short Line Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soo Line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Thank you for your excellent contributions to the article Korean influence on Japanese culture. I know that there has been some resistance to expanding the article, but there are certainly more areas which could be expanded in the future than what you have already edited. It's possible that there may be opportunities in the future for us to work together to further expand the article. If you want, I can e-mail you additional sources of information on this subject.CurtisNaito (talk) 05:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CurtisNaito I would be happy to consult additional sources for you.TH1980 (talk) 02:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user Hijiri88 says that he will not speak to me anymore and is threatening administrative action. You should probably keep an eye on the administrators' noticeboard for possible relevant activity.CurtisNaito (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning a related matter TH1980, since you have expressed interest in the Battle of Nanking before, you might want to take a look at recent discussions involving that article.CurtisNaito (talk) 15:42, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of Japan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is HOUND, BATTLEGROUND, and NOTHERE block request. Thank you. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 13:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have duly responded.TH1980 (talk) 20:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 4, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 4, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to add an extra "=" to each of the subsections of your evidence, making it "===" instead of "==" for each occurrence, to make those sections more clearly part of the same broader section of your evidence. John Carter (talk) 17:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will do so. Thanks.TH1980 (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you again.TH1980 (talk) 17:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TH1980, this is just a note that Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Evidence phase will be closing in 2 days. If you would like to add any additional evidence or respond to statements made by others, you have until November 4th. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TH1980, in the open Catflap08 and Hijiri88 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you.  Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TH1980, please do not edit the Proposed Decision page. If you have any comments, you can add them to Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Proposed decision. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. It will not happen again.TH1980 (talk) 00:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 02:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC) Iwane Matsui, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.CurtisNaito (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1) Catflap08 (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to Nichiren Buddhism and its adherents, broadly construed. Appeals of this ban may be requested no earlier than twelve months since the date the case closed.

2.1) Subject to the usual exceptions, Catflap08 is prohibited from making any more than one revert on any one page in any 24-hour period. This applies for all pages on the English Wikipedia, except Catflap08's own user space. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

3) Hijiri88 (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to Nichiren Buddhism and its adherents, broadly construed. Appeals of this ban may be requested no earlier than twelve months since the date the case closed.

4) Hijiri88 is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to Japanese culture. Appeals of this ban may be requested no earlier than twelve months since the date the case closed.

5) Subject to the usual exceptions, Hijiri88 is prohibited from making any more than one revert on any one page in any 24-hour period. This applies for all pages on the English Wikipedia, except Hijiri88's own user space. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

6.1) TH1980 (talk · contribs) and Hijiri88 are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, each other anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).

For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 23:04, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case closed

Hi TH1980. Without commenting on the particular content dispute above, please note that topics dealing with influences between countries are complex because sources claims sometimes conflict. In these cases, due weight is important to think about with regard to how much emphasis (if any) is placed on a particular claim, but also to consider the quality of the sources themselves, such if there is evidence that they lack editorial oversight, that a particular claim is generally considered fringe/extremist in other sources, and the credentials of the author. Consider that if something you've added is challenged on that basis, you should refer back to sources to evaluate that conflict in more detail. And if you are in disagreement, an RfC is always an option if there isn't much attention on the article. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 12:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@TH1980 (talk · contribs)Concerning this topic, I know that you have expressed some frustration over having to correct all the errors that have been inserted in the article by another user, but I think the article certainly can be improved further just by adding in all the citations, most of which were already part of previous versions of the article. The article could be nominated for good article status after this sort work is complete.CurtisNaito (talk) 22:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I can do that. I've been working on something like that for a while.TH1980 (talk) 23:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A case-amendment request in which you were involved has been archived at WT:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 14:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuant to consensus at this ANI thread, this is formal notice that you are indefinitely topic banned from articles relating to Japan, broadly construed. Katie^talk 13:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I feel this topic ban was rammed through by Curly Turkey and his friends just to remove me and other editors they viewed as troublesome. Wikipedia is a website ruled by anarchy, and it needs massive reform.TH1980 (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: The reason I made the above comment is because only six of the nineteen people who stated their opinion supported topic banning me from all articles related to Japan. The source of the confusion was that member Ricky81682 proposed that I "be topic banned from the Korean influence on Japanese culture". That was actually a page ban, not a topic ban. When other users came in saying that they "support a topic ban", they were referring to the original "topic ban from Korean influence on Japanese culture", which was a misnomer, not a topic ban applying to all Japan-related articles.

Here is how the following users voted:

• Ricky81682=proposed Korean influence "topic ban"
• TH1980=opposed
• 1=Softlavender=supported Japan topic ban
• Nishidani=supported "topic ban" proposed by Ricky81682
• Homemade Pencils=opposed
• Piotrus=opposed
• 2=Curly Turkey=supported Japan topic ban
• CurtisNaito=opposed
• 3=Spacecowboy420=supported Japan topic ban
• Tivanir2=supported "topic ban" proposed by Ricky81682
• Johnuniq=supported "topic ban" proposed by Ricky81682
• 4=Thomas.W=supported Japan topic ban
• Blackmane=supported "topic ban" proposed by Ricky81682
• KoreanSentry=opposed
• Mackensen=supported "topic ban" proposed by Ricky81682
• 5=Begoon=supported Japan topic ban
• 6=Sturmgewehr88=supported Japan topic ban
• H.Humbert=opposed
• Seth Kellerman=supported "topic ban" proposed by Ricky81682

Six out of nineteen does not count as consensus. In fact, the thread was originally archived because a consensus was not reached, but Curley Turkey reactivated the thread. [[1]]TH1980 (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed mention my username or make sockpuppetry accusations against me anywhere on English Wikipedia, including your own userspace. I have therefore reported you on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#TH1980. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TH1980. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TH1980. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An amendment request, requesting suspension of Remedy 3 of Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case has been archived at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. The case has been amended as following:

Remedy 3 (Hijiri88: Topic ban (I)) of the Catflap08 and Hijiri88 arbitration case is suspended for a period of six months. During the period of suspension, this restriction may be reinstated by any uninvolved administrator, as an arbitration enforcement action, should Hijiri88 fail to adhere to any normal editorial process or expectations in the area defined in the topic ban remedy. After six months from the date this motion is enacted, if the restriction has not been reinstated or any reinstatements have been successfully appealed to the Arbitration Committee, the restriction will automatically lapse.

Passed 8 to 0 with 1 abstention by motion at 12:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

For the Arbitration Committee, Kostas20142 (talk) 14:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TH1980. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here, if you're interested. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 12:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The ARCA has been withdrawn by Hijiri88. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 02:06, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was this about?--Bbb23 (talk) 23:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. An internet glitch at my end did that. Sorry. I kept getting the old version even when I tried to access the new. Issue has been fixed at my end.TH1980 (talk) 00:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks for the explanation.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TH1980, I agree. Sonasan railway station does not meet WP:GNG. My request for a redirect, the remedy suggested by Wikipedia:Notability_(Railway_lines_and_stations)#Stations was ignored. Instead, another editor deleted the article under WP:G7. You are invited to improve Sonasan, and to look at Hapa Road railway station as an example of an article that others argue should stay. Rhadow (talk) 12:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You recently posted this: "Delete Article reads more like a promotional blurb than an encyclopedia entry" on the deletion page of Razak Lawal. Would you please find time to help me improve the language, as I am unable to make it read better, using available sources online. Bemmax (talk) 20:44, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bemmax you don’t need to message all those upholding the delete !vote rationale in the AFD but you may however lay your rationale in the AFD where other editors can weigh in & cast their own !votes. Furthermore for future sake I’d say the manner in which you name a new topic in talk pages of other editors is very confusing & misleading, a passer by may assume it is TH1980 article but for deletion whereas it is yours. Capiche? Celestina007 (talk) 16:40, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your Wikipedia contibutions! Analog Horror, (Speak) 03:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TH1980 - I've closed your TBan appeal at AN as successful, and lifted your editing restriction covering subjects concerning Japan. Happy editing. GirthSummit _(blether) 09:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't mean to stir up unnecessary drama, and I appreciate the time and effort that you put into taking part in AfD discussions. However, I feel maybe you could take some more time to present arguments for or against deletion. A lot of your !votes recently are just "Delete as per nomination"; AfD isn't supposed to be a vote, but more of a discussion. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:33, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes nominators sum up the case so well, there is nothing really to discuss, hence the way I sometimes vote.TH1980 (talk) 23:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Korean influence on Japanese culture you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Karaeng Matoaya -- Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 11:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Korean influence on Japanese culture you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Korean influence on Japanese culture for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of StoryKai -- StoryKai (talk) 08:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GirthSummit _(blether) 09:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is to inform you that you are now indefinitely banned from making any edit, or editing any page, related to the topic area of Japan. This topic ban will be appealable in six months. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 05:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello—You participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show, season 21) which was closed as delete on 25 April 2020. A user re-created the article on 26 July 2020. The re-created article is identical to the article deleted 25 April and still does not address the WP guidelines in the AFD. I nominated the re-created article for deletion. Would you mind weighing in on the discussion? Thanks. AldezD (talk) 18:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you have some spare time, could you participate in the AFD for Civil Police Officer? It is not getting enough participation. Thank you in advance. 2409:4073:114:4E4C:4D26:ABA5:4290:7758 (talk) 15:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]