On your main userpage in which you clarify where your username doesn't come from, the first instance of "Stax" is a redlink. I haven't played M:tG for years, so I don't know what the link is supposed to refer to, so I figured I'd let you know instead of trying to fix it myself. Also, this page is getting pretty big, it looks like it's almost time for another archiving. - Ugliness Man 12:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stax!
I was wondering if you could vote here? Thanks! --Fir0002 21:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue IX - November 2006
Project news Five new task forces have been created, covering African military history, Balkan military history, Military historiography, Military science, and Military technology and engineering. A guideline for referencing and citation has been adopted.	Current proposals and discussions A discussion regarding categories for military people is ongoing. New naming conventions for military units have been proposed. A discussion concerning project-wide writing contests has begun.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Grafikbot 23:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Thought you might want to know about this, it has the same goals as Wikipedia:WikiProject Photography, but is better organized. --Gphoto^talk 18:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wesley Clark was relieved early and I think it should be in his article. I tried to put it in in a way that avoids all the derogatory stuff that was said about it. I hope you will find it reasonable. If not let me know how you think this should be dealt with. Master shepherd 03:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't change the color scheme at all... I just corrected an incorrect album listing and added singles that weren't on the list (even though they didn't chart, they were still released as singles). Camcallister 18:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Staxringold appears to consider this article personal property, don't take it personal. Any constructive changes are immediately reverted. Exdmd 01:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - this is a message being sent to all who have contributed comments in regards to this page becoming a featured article. I believe appropriate modifications have been made, please contribute any further comments you may have toward it's improvement, otherwise hopefully we can get some support comments happening! Thanks for your hopefully continued interest toward advancing the article. Timeshift 18:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue X - December 2006
Project news Two new task forces have been created, covering Korean military history and New Zealand military history. A new template for external links to images has been created. {{KIA}} and {{POW}} templates have been created for use with the names of commanders in {{Infobox Military Conflict}}. The new naming convention for military units has been provisionally adopted; please help by moving articles to comply with it! Further comments may be directed here. New guidelines and sub-categories for Category:Military history articles needing attention are now available.	Current proposals and discussions A proposal for a mass renaming of by-country military conflict categories has been made. A discussion about naming conventions for firearms is ongoing.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 00:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stax!
Hope you can drop by here and leave your comments! Thanks, --Fir0002 06:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to ask again so soon, but could you please add your comments here? Thanks a lot --Fir0002 03:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image you uploaded, Image:CThopkins logo1.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 15:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

RHB(AWB) 23:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:CBSSundayMorningLogo3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 03:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies for Image:BobMcEwenforCongress.jpg. --Oden 04:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stax,
Hope you don't mind me asking, but could you please take a look at these? Thanks a lot --Fir0002 05:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if the article Battle of the Hindenburg Line is to be deleted because of abundant inaccuracies or if it will remain to be totally rewritten. Brocky44 21:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you uploaded Image:Clark Official NATO Portrait.jpg under a fair use license. I have added a replaceable fair use tag to this page since it conveys material that is already conveyed via free means. --tomf688 (talk - email) 01:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XI - January 2007

Project news A set of five criteria for B-Class status has been introduced; new parameters are available in {{WPMILHIST}} to keep track of articles' progress with regard to these criteria. The implementation of the new naming convention for military units is continuing. The Nordic military history task force has been created. All task forces now have their own sets of assessment statistics, logs, and worklists available. {{Infobox War Faction}} has been created for use with factions participating in a war. A gallery of military related featured pictures has been compiled as part of the project's showcase. Several new category naming conventions have been introduced: All categories classifying military conflicts and operations by country (such as Category:Battles by country) have been changed to use "X involving Y" in place of "X of Y". For example, Category:Battles of France is now Category:Battles involving France. All categories classifying warfare by era (such as Category:Battles by era) have been changed to use "X of the Y era" in place of "Y X". For example, Category:Industrial battles is now Category:Battles of the Industrial era.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 00:34, 24 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's great; I'm changing to support. I'm becoming more and more adept at finding increasingly unimportant faults at FAC, so excuse my rather trivial suggestions ;-) Excellent work, it's a great article. Trebor 20:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. that's why humans will always be better than computers. Trebor 20:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Staxringold, I've seen your picture Image:New Haven Coliseum morning of.JPG in the English Wikipedia and would like to upload it to the Commons to use it in further Wikipedias. I just thought I'd ask whether you would like to do that yourself. Any preferences? --Ibn Battuta 01:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:FireflyGirlInBox2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a country music fan, I wish to congratulate you on the Alison Krauss article, in getting the Featured Article status. Good job! Chris 14:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! I was surprised to see a country music article on the main page as Today's Featured Article. Thank you and please keep up the terrific work. --TantalumTelluride 22:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On February 12, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Calhoun, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 23:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the award — I've had one in mind for you given your prodigious efforts on the Wesley Clark article, but I'm waiting for a more auspicious moment. :) It's getting there. I really do think it will become one of the top bios ... but like fine wine, it takes some time and patience. Actually, I make a lousy reviewer ... I always end up getting involved in "just one more" project. It's hard for me to critique without pitching in. Must be the engineer in me. ;-) Thanks again! Askari Mark (Talk) 01:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to have no verifiable copyright holder information for this image, which is one of our Wikipedia:Fair use criteria. Jkelly 00:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion. The US Constitution certainly does forbid government officials from accepting titles of nobility. The mistake here is thinking that knighthoods are titles of nobility. They are not. As far as I know, they are allowed under the constitution. Also, the distinction between honorary knighthoods and standard ones is incorrect, at least in the British examples. All Americans, whether government officials or not, are awarded honorary honors from the British crown. This means that they are not given the accollade ("dubbed") and do not use the style "Sir." I hope this helps clear things up.--Eva ^bd 15:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's the way I understand it. I know there are some references on the web, but I'll have to dig them up. There may be some other nuances that I've not encountered. Have a great day.--Eva ^bd 16:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pulaski promo tng 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 21:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI if you go to this website.... [1] and type in "Wesley Clarke" you may find photos you can use for the article. Hope this helps some. Cheers--Looper5920 11:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have orphaned this image, for the reasons given on the image page; I don't think it meets WP:FUC #8 in any article. --Robth^Talk 21:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Something's wrong with your userpage. The Babel box is displaying on top of the infobox. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Worthawholebean (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

For some reason the Hopkins School mascot section is commented out. Any reason why? I'm going to add it back in. worthawholebean _talk^contribs 01:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• What exactly do you mean by "archival materials which are not allowed on Wikipedia"? Sorry, just sort of confused here. worthawholebean _talk^contribs 01:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • So I talked to him today and he said he was going to post the research on the school website. Then it will be published and citable. worthawholebean _talk^contribs 02:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support to be added! Regards, --Jayzel 21:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the link to the discussion, so feel free to copy this in. The links you added are fine. Flatterworld 03:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XII - February 2007
Project news The new consolidated review department—combining the existing project peer review and A-Class review with a listing of project articles undergoing various external featured content candidacies and reviews—is now operational. Two new templates have been introduced: {{Infobox Firearm Cartridge}}, a primary infobox for use with firearm cartridges and artillery shells. {{Command structure}}, an auxiliary infobox designed for use with {{Infobox Military Unit}}. An effort is being made to have task forces maintain annotated bibliographies for their topic areas; several task forces have already begun to construct them. The project reached two important milestones this month: 500 active members and 30,000 articles in the assessment system. A military version of Wikipe-tan has been created; a new userbox featuring one of the images is available for interested project members.	From the coordinators The third project coordinator elections have now concluded. Seven coordinators have been selected to serve for the next six months: Carom (talk · contribs) FayssalF (talk · contribs) Kirill Lokshin (talk · contribs) Kyriakos (talk · contribs) LordAmeth (talk · contribs) Petercorless (talk · contribs) Wandalstouring (talk · contribs) Congratulations to the winners, and thanks to all of the candidates who put themselves forward for this responsibility, and to the retiring coordinators for all of their efforts to improve the project! Kirill Lokshin, Lead Coordinator
Current proposals and discussions {{Infobox National Military}} is being developed to replace the old {{Military}} template; comments on the draft version are welcome. A proposal to introduce a category tree for military campaigns, as well as a number of associated classification guidelines, is being discussed; comments would be very appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Delivered by grafikbot 17:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Check my talk page, thanks.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting the T-26 during FAC! JonCatalan 20:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nice job on the page stax...marcus