Hi Sri Harsha 191817! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atimaharathi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kesari and Anjana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome sir. Sir, we should thank user Festival Lovers because he/she created article Atimaharathi. I was just seeing his/her latest contributions. Accidentally I saw it and provided links. Once again, you are most welcome sir.

Hello, I'm TheAwesomeHwyh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bhima—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheAwesomeHwyh 16:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought I reverted the edit which was below. My intention was to revert the edit below it. But by mistake, I reverted wrong edit. Thanks for telling me. Once again sorry for unconstructive edit. Sri Harsha 191817 (talk) 08:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is WIkipedia:Autoconfirmed, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Cheers, Polyamorph (talk) 11:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sri Harsha 191817, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks - no blogs. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir, I thought you were normal user. And now I got the point sir. Sir, Thank you for correcting me. Sri Harsha 191817 (talk) 08:54, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you directed my article to "Hindu mythological wars"? Is it not ok. Festival Lovers (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its not your article. You might have created it. But you can't say that it's your article. The reason is- it is same content which is in Hindu mythological wars. You copied and pasted from the above article. Moreover admins have redirected Atimaharathi, Maharathi etc. So I redirected it. If you still have doubts, please approach wikipedia admins Sri Harsha 191817 (talk) 02:58, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—SpacemanSpiff 06:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much sir. Wish you the same sir 💙

You are most welcome. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can install twinkle. If you use that, you can revert consecutive disruptive edits in one go. Not 3 times likr this. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know sir. I selected it in my preference but it is not visible sir. Thank you very much for your advise sir. Sir, I hope you will guide me and take me in correct path. Thank you sir Sri Harsha 18:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Hmm.. sometimes that happens. I also had problems with some gadgets. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir. Thank you sir Sri Harsha 18:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

Just wanted to let you know that both Critical Edition and Southern Recension mention him failing to string the bow. Lifting was successfully done by him and many other suitors.

So reverting your change.

If you have any concerns, please ping me here. We can discuss. (Panchalidraupadi (talk) 13:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Yes. I got your point. But grammatically it is not correct. Like what's meaning of "string the bow". Sri Harsha 14:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Google stringing the bow...:) Also check Drupada's page. Panchalidraupadi (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir

Sri Harsha 02:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sri Harsha 191817 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not sock of anyone. It might be co-incidence. Please unblock me. If you want, please see my track record. I just reverted edits but never created vandalism. Infact i fought against vandalism. Please unblock me. Hope I get unblocked. Sri Harsha 11:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A simple denial is not sufficient in sockpuppetry cases, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so. If you are not a sockpuppet, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why we think you are if you aren't. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.