Cannabis Ruderalis

Adding images[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. While adding images to articles, it is best to position an image just above the section paragraph or at the right (whenever possible) to ensure the formatting of the article stays as perfect as possible; you can check this by previewing your edit prior to making it. Templates can also be added to articles by this method {{Template}}, but generally spoiler templates shouldn't be added to sections where there will obviously be spoilers (like the story or character sections, etc.). I've helped format the images and formatting in the Alice Academy and Vision of Escaflowne to that regard. If you need help with anything else, please feel free to ask. ···巌流? · Talk to Ganryuu 16:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did not delete Subaru Imai and Shuuichi Sakurano. I did delete their previous section, but I moved the caharacters to the 'other students' section, since they are still students of the Academy. DarkAngel007 18:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding images in Bincho-tan (anime)[edit]

I'm sorry, the images in Bincho-tan (anime) were captured over a year ago. I do not recall what episodes that they are from. I believe that the source information on the image pages is as much as I can do. --Squilibob 11:33, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gakuen_Arisu_Fan_Book_Volume_1.gif[edit]

I have tagged Image:Gakuen_Arisu_Fan_Book_Volume_1.gif as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Comet[edit]

The anime and manga genre categories (Category:Comedy anime and manga, Category:Action anime and manga, etc.) don't mean that a series is both an anime and a manga, it simply refers to the genre. Since anime and manga have the exact same genres, the categories were merged to stop series that have both anime and manga from having 6 or 8 duplicate genre categories.

So in this case, "anime and manga" is just shorthand for the type of Japanese illustrated media franchise that they, along with light novels, visual novels, dojin, etc. combine to make up.

Finally, User:Cyde wasn't actually the one who made that change, so complaining to him won't help. He just runs an automatic editing account that completes Wikipedia:Categories for discussion discussions by fulfilling their decisions. Quite a few people were involved in the decision on those categories, and though it was a pretty close decision, it was determined that avoiding redundant categories was worth the minor risk of confusion.

Hope that explains everything for you. Have a nice day. --tjstrf talk 05:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, I can understand that. Thanks, by the way. Samantha Lim88 03:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

The light novel information was taken from the Japanese wiki page, and we're not supposed to cite other wikis, so there is no citation as of yet. I guess I could cite a retailer, but that wouldn't be much better...-- 02:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Character sections[edit]

In the main article page, character sub-sections, such as "main characters", "other characters" or other similar sub-sections such as "faculty and staff", must be decentralized i.e. they must be titled within this format: === === rather than simply == == which can distort the article's overall format. Please feel free to see WP:FICTION and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) for a further explanation. ···巌流? · talk to ganryuu 08:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template[edit]

If you want some starter code, take it from another template. Take the Cardcaptor Sakura one I wrote, for example. Replace links and color tags as needed. I'm not sure how else to teach you. Hopefully you have a little bit of basic Wiki-markup and HTML knowledge. Luckily you can use the Sandbox or "Show preview" as often as you need to until things get right. --Crisu 04:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of flagicons[edit]

Why did you remove the flagicons from V.B. Rose? Extremepro (talk) 13:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed that the publisher field was already for Japanese publishers, as written here:[1] As for the en_publisher field, I think it is unnecessary to put flagicons while it is already stated for English. If Canada is importing the books then it should be written in the article itself. Moreover, about the other_publisher field, I removed the flagicon because you have already stated that Jpop is the Italian publisher for the series. In short, I know I shouldn't have just edited it without consultation. -- Samantha Lim88 (talk) 07:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FA-class Tokyo Mew Mew and GA-class Fullmetal Alchemist have flagicons for Japanese publisher, English publisher and Other publishers. Mentioning that the publisher is from a certain country is not a reason for removing the flagicon(s) for the said publisher because all info from the infobox is meant to be replicated in the article. Extremepro (talk) 07:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you know the when the manga began and ended serialization in Hana to Yume, do you know how many chapters of V.B. Rose were published? Would be a great help, thanks. Extremepro (talk) 10:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Sorry for the late reply. There are 83 chapters in total, compiled into 14 volumes. The date is already stated at the page. Hope this answers your question. Samantha Lim88 (talk) 14:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That helps a lot. Thnaks. Extremepro (talk) 07:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, why is the original run date on the 19th? The magazine is always released on the 5th and 20th of every month. Sorry to bother you. Samantha Lim88 (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That date is the release of the 1st tankobon of the manga not the start of the serialization. Change the start of the serialization to the real one if you know it. Thanks Extremepro (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done, hope it's right since the source I found only state the date when the magazine went on sale. Samantha Lim88 (talk) 10:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well it's better than the tankobon release date. Thanks for adding the info. Extremepro (talk) 10:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, no problem at all. :) Samantha Lim88 (talk) 10:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooku ref[edit]

Thanks for the Ooku ref. Extremepro (talk) 09:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome ^__^ Been going to ANN often lately... Samantha Lim88 (talk) 05:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Samantha Lim88! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Akemi Satō (singer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Za HanaYume cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Za HanaYume cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

End of year awards[edit]


The Anime and Manga BarnSakura Award
I award you this BarnSakura in recondition of your contributions to anime and manga articles during 2010 and because everyone deserves a little recondition every once in a while. ;) —Farix (t | c) 21:03, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clamp Gakuen Tanteidan (song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clamp Gakuen Tanteidan (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clamp Gakuen Tanteidan (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 11:48, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply