Hi, Wiki projet Airline destinations lists Turkey in Europe, yet a map posted in the discussion page correctly shows Turkey as West Asia, I suggest Turkey be moved to Asia list.(202.141.233.30 (talk) 17:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC))

Thanks for uploading Image:Air Algerie logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been named as a party in a mediation cabal case. If you are involved (or not therefore), you may make the appropriate changes to the case, i.e. add your username to the "Who's involved?" section. Thank you. Rudget. 16:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Wouldn't it be better if all such lists were made into collapsable table format like in your Aeroflot article and included in main airline article destination section rather than on a seperate page or article.(116.71.56.127 (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC))

Could you please provide a provide a link to where the discussion about renaming all the national lists of companies took place? The new naming convention looks very messy. - SimonLyall (talk) 09:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I have posted to WP:ANB requesting advice about getting you changes reversed since you appear to have done this without explanation and I feel the new naming is worse than the previous. - SimonLyall (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I have nominated Category:Companies of Russia by location (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Companies of Russia by city (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Russavia (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm going back though all the vietnam air bases pages that I wrote, removing the national flags and putting in the roundrels of the air forces that stationed aircraft there...

I've changed Cam Ranh to relfect that. Although the VNAF did use their national flag on their tails, they also used a roundrel as the USAF does and the Soviet/Russian VVS.

Also, if you know the aviation regiments that were sent to Cam Ranh by the VVS, it would be a fine addtion to the article.

Hopefully this will adress the NPOV issue and everyone will be happy in the sandbox again....

Warmest Regards

Bwmoll3 (talk) 09:40, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

It was initially a redirect; can it remain as that? Think the history should be preserved. Please reply on your talk page. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I didn't notice it was previously a redirect, I have just redirected it to its previous article. The russian ISP isn't notable, but in the event it is in future, at least the history is there as you mentioned. Thanks for that. --Россавиа ^Диалог 22:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

-WarthogDemon 01:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Category:AACO members, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Category:ELFAA members, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Me and many of the other users who frequently add to the Wikipedia Qantas Page would appreciate if you stopped deleting many of the incidents. The fact is that they were incidents, whether there was no deaths or airframe damage doesn't matter. They are well documented, even by qantas.com, and will remain there.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darren Cuthbert (talk • contribs) 09:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I have nominated Category:Members of the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Association of Asia Pacific Airlines members (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Россавиа ^Диалог 18:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Good job! I didn't even noticed that too until you mentioned it and put it back in place. Guess that's why we all need help from each other, no matter how big or how small the wiki-project might be. Cheers. -- Dave1185 (talk) 21:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Until past discussions such as [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] were adequately addressed and resolved, are you in any position to reassert your POV now? What is the difference between the situation then, and the situation now for you to bring up the issue once again?--Huaiwei (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

That is a whole lot of repeatitive garbage which I will simply not waste my time on. If you are capable of talking sense and at least acknowledging your own POV on this issue (which you persist in believing is a domain exclusive only to those who dare oppose you), then kindly keep this discussion in the main article talkpage, instead of snooping around in specialised discussions (the participants of which may not know the full range of concerns here) and issuing threats in my talkpage.--Huaiwei (talk) 10:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi russavia how are you?? i hope you be fine. Hey about Air Dominicana, i think it is not a planned airline because they are an Airline not a rumor or something like that so i think it should be better a Dominican Airline, uch as Sol Dominicana Airlines, Caribair, those airlines have its airplanes, they only are waiting for the date to start PASSENGER OPERATIONS. Have you heard that Air Dominicana's Boeing 737 is right now in a operations text with the Air Dominicana livey and the dominican registration???, so i think that the only two planned airlines that we have in Dominican Republic are Merengue Airlines Dominicana, and Ocean Airways Aircraft Services because those airlines doesn't have its aircraft yet an ether they aren't salling tickets as Air Dominicana and Sol Airlines are.-what is your opinion of this-

Ahh, also thanks for the invitation for the Aviation Wikiproject, i would like to much to participate in that wikiproject, but i need to know how to join because i didn't found the link and what exactly is this for???

Thanks Russavia, i hope you undertand me... ChezSant (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Heyyy????ChezSant (talk) 02:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Huaiwei's now insulting me for reading your comments, so you might want to chip in and give your own opinion about what your own comment means. I have no doubt that Huaiwei will promptly declare you to be wrong as well though... Jpatokal (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh please. This sounds like an outright plea for Russavia to switch his position to tally with yours irrspective of his original opinion just to retaliate against a common enemy. You truly have issues, Jpatokal.--Huaiwei (talk) 20:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Is removing flag icons from code share airlines list a crime? people are reverting my edits for Pakistan International Airlines list, obviously the flags serve no purpose except for striking some ones childish imagination to make everything colourful and pretty.(116.71.57.90 (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC))

Thanks for uploading Image:Sterling logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Twinkle didn't finish this AfD for you; I fixed it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

You reduced the list of recognizing countries from 36 + 1 to 3. Something went wrong there. --Mareklug ^talk 04:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

It happened just exactly like I said it would. I hope you're happy. Some people exist just to stir up trouble. And your pronouncement "I am a little surprised at the reply from Chris above"... wow Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Farnborough Air Show to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
2. Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 00:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Are you interested in this article? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

You have blasphemed against the retention of fancruft articles! All the obsessive fans of minutia are going to curse your name! --Orange Mike | Talk 21:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

You certainly have the "right of reply", but you'll note that I moved both your and Huaiwei's comments into a separate section. Your squabble about who sued who for the Silkair crash has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of the thread, which concerned airport destination lists.

Quite frankly, I'm disappointed by the way you're letting Huaiwei provoke you. Try doing what I do: just ignore the personal attacks, and strike them out if they go overboard. Jpatokal (talk) 03:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

May I ask why you replaced the Virgin Blue logo with a lower quality, out-dated one? As I stated in the photo description, the logo was seen used on Virgin Atlantic's Australian website and represents the most current version. Though it may be a different format than the one on Virgin Blue's website it is still obviously being used. NcSchu_(Talk) 16:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Finnair logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not going to speedy this as spam, because it isn't really an advert, but I've taken it to AFD. Stifle (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Virgin Blue logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I noticed you have changed several articles which use the name of the Tongan capital. The correct spelling is Nuku'alofa. Somehow your change involves a character which is displayed as a square on my browser. Kransky (talk) 11:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

somebody has explained to me the correct character to use. Thanks for fixing back. Kransky (talk) 13:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I hope you won't mind I reverted your edit at Air Koryo after reading the MOS about Korean articles. I'm going to clean the article a bit today, any input you might have would be interesting. Mthibault (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Diplomaticworld has created this article in what appears to be blatant content forking, because I have issues of him including as missions an honorary consulate in Manila and an (alleged) trade office in Coimbra, Portugal. Please review the debate at Talk:Trade Missions of Vanuatu and add your opinion - by all means contact him for his side of the story. Kransky (talk) 10:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Russavia, I don't see that the issue about the subsidiaries being resolved yet in WP:Airports, have it?--Zack2007 (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi,can you please fix the Iran Air article so external links can show up, I tried to but it isnt working, the links just disappear despite being listed in there.(116.71.59.84 (talk) 18:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC))

Someone keeps removing Virgin Nigeria destinations and relists them in main article, can you please prevent the person from removing the above link, I have not created it but since it exists then the link should be mentioned in the main article or delete it so it wont show up when searching for Virgin Nigeria.(202.133.72.200 (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC))

• No mediation needed as issue resolved. (202.133.72.200 (talk) 17:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC))

I noticed that you were replacing a blue link category with a red linked one, First AIr. Were you planning to create the category? CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 16:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Emptying a category is an out of process change. If you want to rename a category, then you need to make a nomination at WP:CFD. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Also Category:Regional Airline Association of Australia members is not redirecting properly yet SatuSuro 05:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Dear Russiavia, I think this is harmful and breaks the link to the flag. Could you please first make sure that the St. abbreviation doesn't occur in links, direct quotations and who knows what else? I don't think that it is a good idea to make such changes summarily.Colchicum (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Antinea Airlines logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Some had created another destination list for El Al in collapsible form and added it to the main article destinations section, despite there being a seprate original El Al destinations list article already linked there. I have deleted the collapsible version but now feel it looked better, can you have a look at it and restore it if you feel its good and delete the original seprate article, as you did for Oman Air and Aeroflot. (203.81.207.237 (talk) 17:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC))

I just thought this page might interest you Singapore Airlines Fleet. Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 23:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, editor PikDig is repeatedly removing referenced former destinations Israel and Kuwait from Terminated destinations list, despite route maps added there showing both places were served. (203.81.207.237 (talk) 17:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC))

Why not make it a wiki rule to make all future airlines destination lists in collapsible table form and place them in main article like for Aeroflot and Oman Air, this way there will be no need to create seprate destinations page for airlines that dont have them, or go to a second page just to see the destinations for airlines that have these linked second articles, existing pages can be converted to collapsible table format with time, please hold consensus on this. (116.71.37.116 (talk) 18:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC))

Please make an effort to be less confrontational on talk, particularly at SA. There is a useful dialogue there; don't disrupt it William M. Connolley (talk) 18:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Nice job on those relation stubs you're creating.:) Xp54321 (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Nice job on those relation stubs you're creating.:)Dude u gonna create a stub on every country that has relations with Russia?:) Xp54321 (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Singapore Airlines. For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 23:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Remember this. I just noticed it and as nobody had disagreed with it I merged them. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 10:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Is it ok if I create fleet tables for the articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EZ1234 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Someone has messed up Aeroflot destinations list from simple collapsible format to overdone style for main article page.(116.71.61.44 (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC))

Most of Aeroflot post 1992 fomer destinations can be found in reference maps added for Pakistan and Singapore, if you would like to update that table.(116.71.33.61 (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC))

Please refactor or remove your first comment in [6]. Its clearly incivil William M. Connolley (talk) 18:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dragonair logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with the page List of largest airlines in Oceania on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Sparrowman980 (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I had previously started a discussion on Talk:Airliners.net expressing concerns about the paragraph on competing websites. You may wish to take a look at it and add to the discussion there. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 15:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

IATA call the place Khwaja Rawash Airport, and not Kabul International, I suggest name be changed the former.(116.71.43.165 (talk) 19:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC))

Hi, some person insists on removing Orlando from Korean Air former destinations list despite it being added with a reference map showing the place as having been served, he's even removed it after the issue was brought to his special attention with an italicised note in the main article list telling him to look at reference map, can you please issue a warning to him.(116.71.35.209 (talk) 16:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC))

They did it again from a different IP, please take note.(203.81.206.16 (talk) 11:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC))

Issue resolved, Orlando was served code share thats why it was being removed from the list, but editor did not leave a note informing one of this, so the misunderstanding.(116.71.37.116 (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC))

Turbat Airport is not called Turbat International Airport in Pakistan, only one international flight operates from there and that too just once or twice a week to Sharjah, you will not find any source on the internet referring to it as Turbat international Airport, there are many airports listed at this site without the international tag attached to then yet they are major international airports such as Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Frankfurt Airport as well as many others, there wa sno need to change name of the article when the airport is not called as such.(202.133.79.232 (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC))

Hello, just wondering are you from Russia? --serhio ^talk 10:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm not very happy with your page move, because in German it is Auswärtiges Amt not Bundes Auswärtiges Amt (Bundes is the translation of federal), I think it is most commonly known as Foreign Office (Germany) and this page was/is in a merge discussion. So IMHO your move was quite a bit fast. Greetings Sebastian scha. (talk) 20:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Уважаемый Russavia!

Хотелось бы отметить Ваш огромный вклад в авиационную часть Википедии. Вместе с тем, нельзя не напомнить Вам, что Википедия - ОБЩАЯ сокровищница знаний. Например, Вы удалили фотографию посадочного талона на рейс Ташкент --> Алма-Ата. А Вы знаете, что это один из единственных официальных документов авиакомпании, в которых используется только русский и английский языки, и нет ни слова на узбекском? К примеру, Air Astana все свои документы пишет на трёх языках (английский, казахский и русский). Википедисты, которые интересуются также лингвистикой, обязательно обращают внимание на такие мелочи.

С уважением,

Ds02006 (talk) 13:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Can you take a look at this discussion and provide some advice? I think given the name issues, the renaming and then manually splitting out any that don't belong would be the fastest way to clean this up. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

• Looks good. I was concerned that adding ambassadors in the diplomatic missions by country articles would detract from its main scope.

You might want to liaise with people who prepare similar articles (eg: List of Israel Ambassadors, List of Ambassadors and High Commissioners to the United Kingdom, United States Ambassador to Somalia and develop a consensus on how these articles could be organised.

As your article currently stands, it appears to duplicate information in Diplomatic missions of Russia - certainly its chapeau has been plagurised. You may wish to just concentrate on the ambassadors themselves, otherwise it could be a candidate for an AfD. Kransky (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

• Очень интересно. Постараюсь чем-то помочь, если real life не помешает. (Это я про дипломатические миссии, в смысле.) - Zac Allan (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
  • What exactly is the main scope Kransky of those articles? By all means, nominate this for AfD if you wish, and don't use the word plaguarised on WP. --Россавиа ^Диалог 01:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Can you point out where you moved this to, please? I saw the reference at WP:EAR and I'm trying to figure out what happened. Thanks. --AndrewHowse (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining. I took your edit summary to mean that you were moving it, not just deleting it. In any event, it would have been nice if you'd engaged in conversation; it now looks as if you were just ignoring other users. --AndrewHowse (talk) 17:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Please be advised that I have sought comment from others concerning your behaviour, specifically, to continue creating subcategories linked to Category:Diplomatic missions by country that themselves are categories linked to only a few minor stubs, when your proposal has been overwhelmingly rejected by other users. Please answer your case on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User:Russavia‎. Kransky (talk) 12:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Answered --Россавиа ^Диалог 01:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop reverting the changes that I have made to the subcategories in Category:Diplomatic missions by country. They are not helpful and make the page look very clustered. I (and many of us) feel that they are not serving their purpose and make things more complicated than actually trying to simplify them. The same goes for Category:Diplomatic missions by host country. Aquintero (talk) 17:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Refer to the RfC --Россавиа ^Диалог 01:52, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete the accretited embassies of Russia, I am just curiuos.Oxey89 (talk) 21:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)User:Oxy89

Hi, because they are no embassies in Russia, they are embassies in Berlin, London, Prague, etc. They don't belong on a Diplomatic missions in Russia article, but rather they belong on the relevant bilateral relations article, i.e. Guyana-Russia relations. --Россавиа ^Диалог 01:53, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there Russavia,

It seems there is no consensus on naming for bilateral relations articles, but please try to remember to add Category:Bilateral relations when you create articles on bilateral relations on top of the other articles. I still think categories such as Category:Russia-Tanzania relations are over-categorization though. Don't you think they'd be better served by simply being included in the main foreign relations of X category?--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Category:Bilateral relations looks too problematic, this could potentially have tens of thousands of articles under this category, it needs to be split up, or looked at to find a way to better organise it. I'll post a message on your talk page in due course for your input in gathering concensus. --Россавиа ^Диалог 01:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

The Indonesian project is plagued by massive list cruft - I wouldnt encourage them - they add names and never do anything - it is usually zilch english eds who want to play with the project from ips - to suggest that we actually leave grey or red links over time simply gets more red links added like some very weeird wish list. The english capacity of the red links can be seen on the football pages - about level 1 or minus :( in other words they add a lnk and we never see them again. So over all a bad idea - cheers thanks for the optimism but SatuSuro 13:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Some persom with username Jaspel is going around changing airport names, in most cases he's removing the term "international" from them in others he's re-adding names that were used previously but now redirect to the new name articles, please check, I have come across this at El Al and Pakistan International Airlines there may be others.116.71.59.229 (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Category:Bosnian diplomats, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 23:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

May I ask why you removed WP Angola from he article Angola–United States relations? I'm sure you had a good reason but I couldn't make out what it was. Thanks.Student7 (talk) 12:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The article was added by way of using a category, this isn't how to do it. If you look at the wikimarkup of the template now, you will see how to add articles to the Angola WikiProject. Need any help with that in future, let me know. --Россавиа ^Диалог 12:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I think many of these should just be in a section with their diplomatic country mission pages, rather than their own article, simply because many countries use ambassadorships as payoff for political favors. A colonel in the military is not necessarily a notable person. He may have a good education, language skills, and international relationship skills that could make him a good ambassador, but if he were notable, that information would be spilled all over the place by both Libya and Russia. It's not, so in all likelihood he's not notable enough to find information sufficient to write an article. --Blechnic (talk) 19:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Why did you get rid of star alliance destnations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.95.138.197 (talk) 04:45, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I myself didn't get rid of the Star Alliance, Skyteam and Oneworld destinations, but rather I put them up for discussion at WP:AFD. It is my opinion that those lists were pure overkill, particularly as none of the alliances are actual airlines, if a list of destinations is needed to be found they should be found under the individual airlines section, although it is also increasingly my belief that even those lists are non-encyclopaedic, due in no small part that they are not referenced to reliable, independent sources, as required by WP:V. --Россавиа ^Диалог 23:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi; I see that you recently removed the category Category:Polish-Russian relations from every article and category in which it appeared and replaced it with Category:Poland–Russia relations, which you created. The original category was then deleted as being "empty", simply because you emptied it. While this rename might be a good idea, your method of renaming the category is inappropriate. WP:CFD exists for proposing renames to categories; this process allows comments to be made on a proposed change and the name to proceed or not proceed based on consensus. In the future, please use WP:CFD when you feel the name of a category should be changed. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 10:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Large amounts of new categories and no project tags - it would be a good idea to actually assist projects in keeping tabs of new categories by putting skeleton templates on the talk pages - as a matter of courtesy - some projects have few if any category maintainers and all it needs is you and two others to keep creating new categories to leave some projects scratching their heads as to where the categories came from - t doesnt take much - cheers - and if I have missed where you have done so - my apologies to you in advance - but just coming across even just a few is enough to provokes this suggestion SatuSuro 15:30, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

A lot of projects don't 'tag' categories, WP:RUSSIA being one of those. It is my understanding that these categories are picked up by bots on a regular basis anyway. --Россавиа ^Диалог 16:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Show me the bots - they are rare as active eds - basic project maintenance if you watch most projects need their categories and articles tagged to be able to run assesment logs correctly - I asked it as a courtesy not as a demand btw SatuSuro 16:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I concur...you appropriated the "Diplomatic Missions by Country" category to add in your articles, despite others having misgivings for this move as previously mentioned. The articles you have instead linked to this category are mostly stubs (in most cases just the address of an embassy and maybe the name of the ambassador). You would be more useful to Wikipedia by writing articles with substance than creating categories to suit your own whims. Please revert your changes. Kransky (talk) 15:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I haven't appropriated anything. Alas, I have followed long-standing convention here on WP in regards to categorisation of lists and articles, and it isn't just articles (some stubs) which I have created, but a whole lot of articles created by a whole lost of other editors. And as you can see, there is now no 'cluttering', and articles and lists are easily found by way of categorisation, that of course being the entire of categories in the first place. And I object Kransky, to your continued use of 'articles with substance' comments, whilst some of the Russian 'articles' I have created are stubs at the moment, many of these are being expanded, and some will be expanded by myself in future, but first and foremost, it is part of fighting systematic bias here on Wikipedia. --Россавиа ^Диалог 16:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I haven't appropriated anything Yes you have; you are now using the Category:Diplomatic missions by country category to sort your subcategories, and not the actual articles that were written before. Please do not insult my intelligence. People have commented on your suggestion before; some agree but many don't.

I object Kransky, to your continued use of 'articles with substance' comments...whilst some of the Russian 'articles' I have created are stubs at the moment, many of these are being expanded, and some will be expanded by myself in future. Pray tell - how do you propose to expand (say) the article Embassy of Russia in Damascus? Beyond supplying us with the fact that it is the chief diplomatic mission of Russia in Syria (no sh*t, Sherlock) and its address, what additional facts will you be supplying in the future? Bilateral ties has its own article. Do you know something substantive about the building? I would struggle to find something in the public domain worth contributing on this subject. Frankly I am not confident that you or others will end up making this article anything more than a stub - saying it is a "work in progress" is not really bona fide if there is little work that could possibly be added.

If you think there is systematic bias you should talk about it, rather than making your own dramatic changes against the judgement of others. Happy to seek arbitration. Kransky (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)