Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Piguy101. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I was updating a Playboy Playmate article and noticed the odd order when I was correcting a Wikilink. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 00:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

I agree his assassination is important and newsworthy. But do you think it's really worthy of being part of his descriptor? We don't identify McKinley, Garfield, Kennedy, etc. as "president and assassination victim. Or John Lennon as rock legend and assassination victim. I think how Mellet died is crucial to his article, but I don't think it belongs in his descriptor phrase. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.188.95.246 (talk) 03:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Good point. Feel free to undo my undo.Piguy101 (talk) 03:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Replied at Talk:Mexico at the 2014 Winter Paralympics. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

When reporting users to AIV, please use the template provided. Twinkle provides a helper for this. ⁓ Hello71 02:32, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that. It was my first time reporting a user. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 02:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Happened on a page by three separate editors same procedure - Hostility on Page Please explain

WikiShares (talk) 01:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

All I did was correct grammar on Water fluoridation. Your edit [1] contained two independent clauses in a sentence, the definition of a run on. I made the sentence correct by subordinating the first clause by adding "although." Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 03:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Ok - well I was reverted by other editors instantly reverting time spent on new research and citations. So I opened an admin. Apologies if I included you wrongly, as simply discouraging any editing of this page. I have began a discussion on the admin notice board. I cited the imposition of personal opinion vs the Verifiability Policy. This is the link to the page it is listed on. In it there is a reference to your reversion as well. I removed Although because it is a minimizer. Perhaps the rest of the sentence could have been adjusted. Here is the link although its not too serious it seems on the one word. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Water_Fluoridation_is_a_controversial.2C_page._Senior_Editors_are_not_following_Wiki_Verifiability_Policy_-_attempting_to_judge_quality_of_research_selectively._Censoring_HSPH_study_issued_with_a_press_release_by_the_institution.

Piguy101 Please redo my post of the Moorish Science Temple of America page. I am a registered member of this organization and is qualified to speak on the organization and post our link so that readers can get more information about our organization and Moorish history. Many information on the page are incorrect and false. Our website has a history break down and contact information for the public to get clarity; again why the link www.moorishamericannationalrepublic was posted. MoorishAmericanNationalRepublic (talk) 21:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

You may be a valid member of the organization, but edits solely for the promotion of an organization are unwelcome on Wikipedia. Your contributions are only propaganda or advertising. According to WP:PROMOTION, the edits should not be part of Wikipedia. This is an encyclopedia, not a soapbox. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 01:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

only for pdf creation, i will edit back in 1 minute or 2 (depending on file size) THANK YOU!!!)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for the good work you're doing to keep Wikipedia free from unwanted content.  —SMALLJIM  10:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on article about Ann-Sophie Qvarnström! I´m new at this and can sure use all the help I can get. I assure you that the references are legit. Even if you can´t read Swedish, you can look at the pictures and check with names. - W.carter (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem. Keep up the editing! Piguy101 (talk) 15:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I've declined your speedy because the article claims that he was an MP. That's enough to pass A7. However, I've added prod-blp to it as it's not referenced. Peridon (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

I did not catch that. Sorry Piguy101 (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

YEA I DONT CARE I WAS BORED — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronaldo 7Realmadrid (talk • contribs) 19:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey Piguy101 I saw you undid my contribution to the wiki where I went into further detail on the Paul Krugman review, as it was not constructive. I think it's important given the attention this book has gained to give a more nuanced appraisal especially with regards the content of the Krugman review, as the books reception within the economics community has been far from as positive as within the mainstream medias. If you'd like iI can go into further detail. I'm new so if there was an error please let me know. Thanks Donnacha Vito Corleone (talk) 20:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnacha Vito Corleone (talk • contribs) 20:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

I apologize for removing any content you added to the article. I undid your edit because you broke the syntax of the infobox by removing the first line ({{infobox book | <!-- See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Novels or Wikipedia:WikiProject_Books -->). By removing that line, which is essential for the page, the table of information (infobox) would not work. See my edit: [2]. Look at the table and book cover image on the right of your screen. Your edit: [3] broke the syntax of the infobox, so the information was displayed in an incoherent list instead of a nice table. Feel free to restore the content I removed when I undid your edit. (See [4] to see what I changed in the undo and add back the content I removed). However, do not remove that top line; otherwise, the infobox would not display correctly. Ask if you have any questions. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 21:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

PS: Add four tildes (~~~~) after writing a message in a talkpage, like this, so others can see who wrote the message.

I don't know who you are,but I know that Perenelle was a sorceress not a alcemist >(

perenelle is a flippin SORCERESS!!!

I think A11 is a better reason to use for speedy deletion than G3 on Island of Distrust. Given the lack of sources, it could be tagged as a hoax. However, I've retagged it as made up. —C.Fred (talk) 21:22, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

A11 may be better. Regardless, the article should probably be deleted. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)