Hi. Could you please explain why you have suddenly nominated multiple articles about alcoholic beverages for deletion en masse? → ROUX ₪ 21:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please stop mass-nominating all of those articles for deletion. Several of them pass notability requirements immediately (e.g. Beefeater, Gordon's, Grey Goose) by dint of widespread mainstream coverage and awareness. Please also answer the question as to why you are doing this. → ROUX ₪ 22:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The playing field needs levelling... PeterS2009 (talk) 22:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What playing field? What are you talking about? All of these are well-known widely available beverages that easily pass the notability guidelines. I will be removing all of these templates now. → ROUX ₪ 22:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Grey Goose (vodka) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Absolut Vodka. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to SKYY vodka. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 22:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this your final warning to stop making disruptive nominations for deletion. → ROUX ₪ 22:11, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sipsmith. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption: abuse of the Articles for deletion template. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 22:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Whitley Neill Gin, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitley Neill Gin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. - Eastmain (talk) 01:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You're recieving this message as a contributor to WikiProject Spirits in the past. Currently many members work solo and articles that interest themselves, we'd like to pull the Spirits group together to allow us to raise the overall quality of articles under our banner. If you're still active on Wikipedia and keen on contributing to WikiProject Spirits, head over to the talk page and lend your voice to the discussion. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]