Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Good editors make good admins. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

	The Original Barnstar
	I gave to barnstar Nrsiva123 (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LKG (2018 film). Since you had some involvement with the LKG (2018 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Parthimurugesan (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Parthimurugesan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Parthimurugesan (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not ready[edit]

I've moved it back. The article is not ready for mainspace. Anarchyte (talk | work) 15:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Parthimurugesan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Parthimurugesan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Parthimurugesan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --SamHolt6 (talk) 22:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:06, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @331dot: I don't have any official relationship with MirrorFly .Mirrorfly is a Chat Messenger App like as Whatsapp & Viber so i would like to research about Mirrorfly and then start writing article in wikipedia that's it hope you understanding thanks for your comments Parthimurugesan (talk) 09:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an "unofficial" relationship? 331dot (talk) 11:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: LOL! don't have any relationship with Mirrorfly. I'm just a Mirrorfly APP user.Thanks Parthimurugesan (talk) 12:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Doc James:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Parthimurugesan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hope you doing good,you have been blocked me indefinitely. you mentioned reason was self-promotion or advertising content but so far i have published three articles in different niches please have look this article this not self-promotion or advertising content GingerMaster Goodachari LKG_(film) and i did nearly 200 edits contributing to Wikipedia.please reconsider my request to unblock.my passion to contribute more article to wikipedia .please give me guidance for what made my mistake in the current article. Thanks in advance Parthimurugesan (talk) 06:11, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

For reasons I am not allowed to disclose publicly, I do not believe you are being completely honest about your relationship with this app. Until you fully describe your relationship and read and comply with WP:COI and WP:PAID, there is no pathway to being unblocked for you, and as such I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 14:38, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: Again Again i said i'm not paid user try to understand .Mirrorfly not paid article content

Dear@Doc James: @331dot:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Parthimurugesan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

apologize for my previous conversation with you,Sorry to say this i'm not only user,im part of CONTUS team ,contus has developed mirrorfly APP.please reconsider my request to appeal unblocking for my profile .its humble request and one more information to telling here i'm not paid user so far i have published 3 article with my own interest.please help me thanks in advanceParthimurugesan (talk) 09:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

> unblocking for my profile

It looks like you do not understand the purpose of Wikipedia. Please answer the following two questions: (1) why does an employee of a company creating an article about said company harm Wikipedia? and (2) what will you edit about if unblocked? MER-C 11:32, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@MER-C: Thanks for your commenting,Here I will try to answer your questions . Purpose of wikipedia Contains all information at one place.come to your point 1) No I'm not doing any harming activities on wikipedia ,this is not company activists its my own interest activity and personally i willing to contribute my article in this kind of nice before that published 3 articles different niche 2) if i am un-blocked honestly i doing contribute edit and publishing articles entertainment and software category last but not the least i'm wanted to move on next level in wikipedia Editors Role that's why i'm tried un-block my profile.My previous article GingerMaster Goodachari LKG_(film) Parthimurugesan (talk) 12:15, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: For your information not your rules is a wikipedia rules but unfortunately last time i was missed wikipedia COI Paid policy Parthimurugesan (talk) 06:06, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Parthimurugesan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Admin someone help me out of this issue Parthimurugesan (talk) 10:21, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First of all, if you have no intention of following our rules, including WP:PAID and WP:COI, we will not unblock you. Second, I don't think your English skills are good enough to contribute here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Noting for the reviewing admin that the user removed the 'previous conversation' that they refer to from this page. To Parthimurugesan, if you work for CONTUS, you are a paid editor, even if you have edited about other things. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Parthimurugesan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #26045 was submitted on Jul 23, 2019 09:55:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:55, 23 July 2019 (UTC) @331dot: please have a look i have undo my past conversation Parthimurugesan (talk) 10:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't have to. You are allowed to remove most content from this page(except for declined unblock requests while blocked). I was simply noting it. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are employed by CONTUS, you are a paid editor. This is the case even if you have not been specifically directed by your superiors to edit Wikipedia. Please read WP:PAID. Someone else will be reviewing your request. 331dot (talk) 10:25, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:Thanks for your instruction

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Because you've continued to remove declined unblock requests, I've revoked your talk page access. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs substantial reviews from recognized objective independent third party sources, and it needs them references formatting according to WP:REFBEGIN so people can see immediately whether the sources are likely to be reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MirrorFly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MirrorFly, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Parthimurugesan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Parthimurugesan. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Parthimurugesan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MirrorFly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Parthimurugesan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MirrorFly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]