These two spelling warriors seem to be the same person (it's almost certain [1] [2] [3]). Alefbe (talk) 21:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

You sure? It looks like Microinjection accidentally undid M karzarj's edit and then undid himself after realizing his mistake. Do you have any other reason to suspect sockpuppetry? Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

It seems to me that he was using the name "Microinjection" in that talk page (and in discussion with Alborz Fallah) and accidentally commented by another ID and then removed it and then returned the same message and signed it with the name "Microinjecion". Anyway, both have been relentlessly involved in a spelling crusade to change "Azarbaijan" to "Azerbaijan" in all Iran-related pages. Alefbe (talk) 04:24, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

User:Junior Sherritt is a somewhat different take on the theme, but it smells babyish... --Stephan Schulz (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

 Confirmed. Sent you an e-mail by the way. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 19:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Got it, thanks! --Stephan Schulz (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikis Take Manhattan Next: Saturday October 10 This box: view • talk • edit

WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT

• Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Fall 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
• Commons:Wikis Take Manhattan (our cool team galleries)
• Streetfilms: Wikis Take Manhattan (our awesome video)

WINNINGS? The first prize winning team members will get Eye-Fi Share cards, which automatically upload photos from your camera to your computer and to sites like Flickr. And there will also be cool prizes for other top scorers.

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, October 10th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's fantastic new event space nestled between Chinatown and SoHo. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:

• Wikis Take Manhattan page at The Open Planning Project

148 Lafayette Street

between Grand & Howard Streets

FOR UPDATES

Please watchlist Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan. This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,

Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Can you have this article[4] deleted, since the same article already exists[5]? Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Redirected to preserve editing history. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, Nishkid! --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I started to create a stub on Donald Hudson, the WWI flier, only to be told you deleted an article under the title Donald Hudson. Is there a reason why I shouldn't create a stub about this fighter ace?

Georgejdorner (talk) 04:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

The article I deleted was complete gibberish. Go ahead and create the article on the WWI flier. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Is it related to User:NisarKand or just a new troll? Alefbe (talk) 12:55, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

 Possible. If the editing pattern matches, then it's probably him. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:27, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

The editing pattern matches. The same is also true for user:119.73.3.51, user:119.73.7.47. Yesterday, 119.73.3.51 got blocked for 72 hours. However, in this case I think it's better to semi-protect those pages (including Amir Kror Suri). Alefbe (talk) 19:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

See also this comment which includes nonsense, personal attacks, religious chauvinism, etc. This guy has still not learned the rules of Wikipedia. Tajik (talk) 15:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Please check against this user as well [[6]]. Also per violation of WP:harrassment, can the user be banned? He has done no significant contribution except attack other users. Here he attacks me [7] and then violates my old user page (having my name I consider it WP:harrassment)) [8] and here he attacks my current page [9]. --Nepaheshgar (talk) 11:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

• Cordyceps2009 (talk · contribs · checkuser · block user · block log · edit count)

My Spidey sense is tingling. All that this single-purpose account seems to do is nominate articles for deletion that Sarsaparilla (talk · contribs) and Abd (talk · contribs) either created or wanted kept in prior deletion discussions. It's the nomination of Bank fee (AfD discussion) for deletion that leads me to believe that this is more about playing some game with respect to accounts and sockpuppetry than it is about genuinely writing the encyclopaedia. Uncle G (talk) 23:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

CU doesn't show anything conclusive. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

.

• Varsovian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

A new account created 28 September. Already an eager participant in hot-button disputes about that area, such as London Victory Parade of 1946 (an event with special importance to Poles). Seems to be following Jacurek around.

See User talk:EdJohnston#User Jacurek and User talk:Varsovian#Concerns about your editing. Matthead comes to mind, but that has already been considered. I thought that the new guy's behavior was already peculiar enough to let him know about the Digwuren ruling. EdJohnston (talk) 21:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Nothing on the CU end. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

[10]

I just noticed this edit by User:Lanternix, who appears to be a Nangparbat sympathizer. This user is falsely claiming that I am HKelkar... Even though this edit was made four months ago, can anything be done to discipline this editor?

Sincerely, Thegreyanomaly (talk) 01:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Does this person still think you're Hkelkar? Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Not sure, but YellowMonkey has come to realize that said user is a sockpuppeteer Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey, Nishkid64. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- Vatsan34 (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that this is Nangparbat again:

86.162.67.52 (talk · contribs) Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 20:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC).

posting history links to make life slightly easier for you [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] Thegreyanomaly (talk) 21:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Could you please take a look at User:Jky52. They've been deleting sourced, but negative info about the Barbaro family. [16] [17] [18] while incorrectly dismissing a nonfiction source, claiming it's novel. [19] Edward321 (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

I just added 5 new English and Italian sources. Jky blanked them again. [20] Edward321 (talk) 22:40, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it's him. I blocked a few more socks as well. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Could you tell me who the other socks are so I can check their contributions? Edward321 (talk) 03:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Check my block log. I marked the block reason as "Mctrain". Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Edward321 (talk) 03:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

...I know I am late, But Belated Happy Birthday wishes Nishkid -- Tinu Cherian - 19:46, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:17, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

I just thought I'd let you know that I think another dispute is starting to form on the Sino-Indian war article. The user Xingdong has attempted to make several rogue edits and has also engaged in the removal of valid citations in what appears to be a blatant attempt to push his POV. In the interests of not starting a revert war, I will be careful with what I revert but I do think that both sides should refrain from nationalistic posturing and making biased claims. See [21] for more information.

Thanks, Vedant (talk) 03:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

You may want to keep a closer eye on talk:Global warming. We had an obvious Scibaby sockpuppet there a couple of days ago (Abu Triale), and there is one there right now (CrenshawB). Raul654 (talk) 16:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

If that's the only Scibaby sock on the loose right now, I'd be surprised. -Atmoz (talk) 16:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Blocked about 10 Scibaby socks. Check the accounts for edits that might not have been reverted. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 21:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. How about User:Sv Sea Lion? Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 22:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

...and Gerhard Loeb? Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 18:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

 Confirmed Gerhard Loeb, not Sv Sea Lion. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

...and Sty Huey. Raul654 (talk) 04:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

...and User: HIstimine . --Stephan Schulz (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

....and User:TREO Phil. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 09:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

When looking at TREO, please notice the coincidal edits with Sv Sea Lion ... i have no idea whether this is scibaby - but it seems to me that these two look like socks of someone.. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 17:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Also User: Netson76. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 05:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Also User: James T. Greely --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

...and User:Tranh Nguyen Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 03:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

and User:Subsumee (moderately likely) and User:Ebb and Flo (very likely) Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:36, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

...and User:TS Handon Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 03:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

All  Confirmed, plus a few more. See my block log for more. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Tokamaxi and Realplex ? --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 06:28, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes and yes. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 04:30, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey! Do you remember which range you blocked last time? I couldn't find it (the /16 has a few innocent users so I'm reluctant to hardblock it). -- Luk ^talk 11:52, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Looks like you found it. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 04:29, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

The article Nair, which is about an Indian ethnic group, is being vandalized repeatedly by users belonging to the Ezhava ethnic group. Since in India, most of the internet providers give dynamic IP instead of a static IP, it is very easy to escape after committing vandalism. IPs include 117.199.5.173, 117.199.1.93, 117.96.123.25, 218.248.73.53, 124.124.195.13, 173.3.44.201. I went through their contributions and found out that every single one of them have made some constructive edits in the Ezhava page and committed frequent acts of vandalism in the Nair and Nair related pages. A mistake made by one of them, exposed a well established user User:Sreejiraj as the sock puppet behind 218.248.73.53 as evident from his conversation in his talk page. I suspect most of these anonymous IPs are actually sock puppets of well established users. Could you advise me how to prevent vandalism from these users? Axxn (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Some kid put in another kid's phone number here. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Done. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 20:56, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

He's back as Xrfjgted (talk · contribs).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello Nishkid64, Millmoss has said that he is not NoCal100 and has sent you an email to that effect. He has contested the block and is looking for an explanation as you can see here. Would you mind letting him know if you received his email? Thanks, nableezy - 16:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, should have at least let you know that I'd unblocked Millmoss (and probably asked first... sorry). The deciding factor in going ahead without more discussion was the disjuncture in the timeline: User:Millmoss was created hours before the NoCal sock User:LoverOfTheRussianQueen was blocked. Anyway, if you wish to discuss it further, let me know. Rd232 ^talk 10:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey there Nishkid. Could you please comment at the SPI case linked above? It is regarding Manhattan Samurai. Thanks, NW (Talk) 00:52, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not have the write to have any text, and/or artical about FrancisLightHouse.

All content about FrancisLightHouse needs to be removed from Wikipedia. A.S.P.

You do NOT have the write to post any thing about FrancisLightHouse on Wikipedia. You need to remove all content from Wikipedia. A.S.P.

Remove this text on this page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/FrancisLightHouse —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.99.83.3 (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I think you'll find that a Checkuser archive in no way violates your rights. It will certainly not be deleted. --King Öomie 18:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, Nishkid, can you email me This deleted page? I shudder to think about what is contained within. --King Öomie 22:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday November 15th, Columbia University area Last: 09/13/2009 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Wikipedia Loves Landmarks, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example particular problems posed by Wikipedia articles about racist and anti-semitic people and movements (see the September meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Long time no ping, Nishkid64 … FYI, I'm still around and doing my thing. :-)

Happy Editing! — 138.88.125.101 (talk · contribs) _{07:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)}

User:EricTyle?

We've now crossed the 400 on the confirmed list...

Thanks, --Stephan Schulz (talk) 08:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

and User:Tom Dietz Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 12:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

as well as Stus36 --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 13:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Another one: Razor Occam? --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 04:20, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

And User: Qstars. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 08:55, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

EricTyle is not Scibaby. The rest are  Confirmed. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:11, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

How bout User:Green Stoole? Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:13, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Phonon Scattering and Ysidro Jones? --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 03:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Novo Ordo Seclorum --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 05:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

All  Confirmed. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 05:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

User:ZeroKule has a somewhat different modus operandi, but smells... --Stephan Schulz (talk) 18:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

ZeroKule is not Scibaby. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Fits & Starts (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) -Atmoz (talk) 03:31, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

 Confirmed, also Guartem (talk · contribs). Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

• JonWocz (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 05:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
• Takstum (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 09:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
• Stusan&Stusan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) -Atmoz (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
• Plarsh (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) - Atmoz (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
  • The last one Plarsh is too obvious. Comes in from nowhere and does nothing but restoring scibaby edits. Guess all the semi's is making him/her act uncautiously.. Either its scibaby - or its someone acting as a proxy. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby. I highly doubt either of the editors mentioned is Scibaby. Thanks. -Atmoz (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

A couple more to check:

• Jarsten8 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Corridors of Power (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

few contribs - but jumps right into the frey --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 10:33, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

And two more:

• Cause For Alarm (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Huffington380 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

thanks, SPLETTE :] ^{How's my driving?} 03:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

...and User:Pete Wayon. He's also coming in as an IP, 173.126.139.87. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 00:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

relatively new user, but not 100% sure about this one, yet judging from his talk page he created mischief not only on GW-related articles: Heqwm2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) SPLETTE :] ^{How's my driving?} 03:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm skeptical of that one, but check it if you think best. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:34, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you are right, it's not him. Though misguided nevertheless... SPLETTE :] ^{How's my driving?} 17:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

• Stephen Graetzel (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is a possible. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 07:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
• Stanford Ng (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) another one to check. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 07:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
• I End My Quest (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) -Atmoz (talk) 05:08, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
• Flavius Butkis (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) not same articles, but fits general pattern of behaviour and commentary. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 13:41, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
• Bre8r (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) every day another sock, seems to be the mantra here. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 07:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
• King Korn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and another one. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I came here via "Wikipedia:CheckUser". I am involved in a discussion at a controversial article Medical uses of silver (formerly Colloidal silver) and I have good reason to suspect that one editor participating in the discussion is a sockpuppet. User:Beaupoint made his (or her) first contribution to Wikipedia to Talk:Medical uses of silver on November 1, and of his 15 contributions since then, 5 more were to Talk:Medical uses of silver. He also advised another editor involved in the discussion, quote:

"Trust me. You will never get the Immunogenics reference or anything remotely like it included in the article. This is a medical article so any references will undergo extreme scrutiny from many editors who haven't even commented yet." Here

How could he possibly know that, if he just joined Wikipedia four days before? The editor I am suspecting of sock-puppetry is User:DHawker, who was an active participant in the preceding, lively discussion at the noticeboard, but has not commented on the article since then. Actually I've just checked his contributions, and it turns out that the only page he as edited since then was User talk:MastCell, where he was discussing a topic ban against him from the article. He made a cryptic remark: It'll never 'be over', (sic) although he modified it 70 minutes later. The ANI thread on his topic ban is here. It might also be important to know whether the IP 123.50.142.4, who reverted my work at the article twice (1, 2) might have been used by him.

I would greatly appreciate a quick reply to my request. This is the first time I am actually having to deal with sock-puppetry. Zara1709 (talk) 23:16, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

I've just noticed that you are since 4 days ago. I had randomly picked you from the list of people who could consider my request, but since I don't know when you'll be coming back, I made a cross-posting at User talk:Carcharoth (who is the first administrator in the list). Zara1709 (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok, the request for checkuser is here. Zara1709 (talk) 00:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

As a past WP:FOUR awardee you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Four Award.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi again. Could you look into this? I think this is Nangparbat again. Same IP range and Pakistani stance.

86.154.149.221 (talk · contribs)

Thanks in advance. Elockid ^(Talk·_Contribs) 19:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Two today:

• Suite Pete (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Hot Kafe (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Same M.O. as usual --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

When you have time, could we get a semi-protect on Vincent R. Gray and Adaptation to global warming. Various socks (likely scibaby) all from Sprint keep trying to revert in scibaby edits. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I'll probably semi if it reoccurs, i'd rather play whack-a-mole if there are any good IP edits, checking on that now.--Tznkai (talk) 01:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi! You have blocked Joklolk commenting him to be a cross-wiki vandal. Can you please point to his original account as I also suspect him to be a sock of another user.--Dojarca (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind--Dojarca (talk) 21:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Nishkid64. I think you should add this to the WP:ArbCom page (here). Regards. E104421 (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #9. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know. --NBahn (talk) 04:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I made a new page, but added an "i", where it isn't needed, in the word Castres. How can I fix it? --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I've unblocked 86.96.228.89 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as it is a proxy used by many users from the UAE. At one point we had the entire country blocked because of one vandal. Fred Talk 14:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Three months have passed since then. I believe my editing policy has been modified sufficiently to warrant a removal of the restrictions. Would you be willing to remove them? Thanks. --Athenean (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Brandon is away for now, so could you possibly take a second look at this result? --King Öomie 21:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi. It has been a week since I replied to your claim of undue weight. As no evidence has been forthcoming, may the tag be removed? Xerxesnine (talk) 11:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Take a look at his edits. I haven't seen even a single constructive edit from him. Alefbe (talk) 06:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

		WikiProject Vancouver
		You have been invited to participate in Operation Schadenfreude to restore the article Vancouver back to featured article status.

- Dear FA Team member, we could use your help if you're available. Mkdw^talk 06:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Ryurong (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

And maybe Riderfanace (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

And definitely KamenRiderKivala (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

And KamenRiderKivara (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and XLR8NRG (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki).—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 15:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, you blocked User:Wolof359 and a couple of socks (User:Freegolan, User:Nosdena12) in July. Could you look at the contributions of User:Ani medjool. The same type of comments with similar language used, as well as (for what few edits there are) similar patterns in timing of the edits. nableezy - 00:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/75.53.127.189 This user has vandalized United Nations geoscheme for Asia and South Asia in ways to remove Iran from South Asia. Can this vandal be disciplined? I have talked to you about a similar IP over the summer [22], he/she is one these single purpose editors vandalizing in regards to this topic. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:41, 3 December 2009 (UTC)