This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

another new user pushing pakistani POV on several articles but has an indian sounding name Rashtra he might be one of our old friends. just wanted to let you know. --Wikireader41 (talk) 14:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...and you've got mail.  :) NawlinWiki (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• P.S. Please don't forget the email block on these. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... and still more. (Wish you'd been here sooner.) Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 06:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Only thing I can think of is that he was using one proxy per new account, which is a good way to prevent detection but seems awfully time-consuming. These are definitely JA/Grawp -- there is no doubt about the username pattern. He spends hours and hours creating these socks -- and he says *we* have no lives? NawlinWiki (talk) 06:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nishkid64. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (talk→ Bwilkins / BMW ←track) 13:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I note you blocked the User:Erin cali70 account, an account which I have been following, see User talk:Erin cali70, although i didn't see any new discussion at the Jvolkblum checkuser area. Perhaps you are not aware that Erin cali was checked and cleared by checkuser of association with jvolkblum. In some discussion even Orlady conceded that Erin cali appeared not to be Jvolkblum, although new evidence could change her and my opinions. But, I am not aware of new evidence or discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jvolkblum or Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jvolkblum or elsewhere.

It is not appropriate to block any new user merely for touching New Rochelle area articles.

Could you please reverse the block and/or explain? doncram (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. Maybe this is indeed the same person as original Jvolkblum or others caught up in this case; I don't know enough about the IP addresses and all that to have real perspective on that evidence, although I have objected to fast judgments made solely on the basis that a new editor touched a New Rochelle area article. As a courtesy to me and/or to this user, would you please Unblock the Talk page of Erin cali70 for the person to be able to respond there? I understand that out of all the Jvolkblum-labelled accounts, only the Talk:Jvolkblum page is unblocked for the original Jvolkblum to respond or to make any appeal. I think it is quite likely that this person is different than that original one, and/or does not have the password or access to that account. I have invested somewhat in trying to assist this Erin cali user, and I would like for the person to be able to respond. I want to see what Erin has to say to me. Thanks. doncram (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Loves Art! (February 27) The Smithsonian American Art Museum will be holding a Wikipedia Loves Art! meetup on Friday, February 27 from 5-7 pm in the Kogod Courtyard. This is a photography event involving Wikipedians, along with Flickr users and others, to generate content for Wikipedia. Come share your experiences, meet the other teams, and take some photos! While RSVPing isn't necessary drop Jeff Gates an email if you're planning on attending so he can get a head count: gatesj (at) si.edu. There also is a signup list here, along with detailed information. The museum is conveniently located across from the Gallery Place-Chinatown metro station. DC 6th Meetup (March 7) The DC 6th meetup will take place on March 7th at Pizzeria Uno's at Union Station, one level up from the main floor. The meetup will start at 5pm, and people usually stick around there for several hours. You can RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 6.

This has been an automated because you your name was on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 16:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you've been doing most of the ckeckusering on User:Cukiger, most recently blocked sock User:Passap (9 January). Could you confirm that User:Spand is also him? See background discussion at commons:User talk:Túrelio. I've gone ahead and DUCK'ed him, but a checkuser confirm might be good. Thanks, Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, confirmed. I've also instituted a rangeblock. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 06:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That guy is really stubborn. It's a pity, because he actually makes some decent contributions in between. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're wielding the hammer today, can you hit this one too? [1] Thanks. Bali ultimate (talk) 19:40, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, and IP blocked. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 19:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

• Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
• An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
• News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
• Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
• Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
• Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 16:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cryingnut (talk · contribs) — Caspian blue, Mtd2006 and I think this user might be a Ziggymaster/Manmohit2002/Mayamore sock; is at South Korea repeatedly reverting to an older version, inserting lots of extreme POV, etc. Would you be able to take a look into it if you have a moment? Thanks, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 06:51, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's him. Blocked. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 07:06, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nishkid64. Our old friend Xetra80 is back. He's got a new account, but he's still pushing the same POV on the same pages, writing in the exact same way, raising the same 'ol complaints, etc. Could you run a Checkuser on this latest account? Best, Middayexpress (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.  Confirmed Xetra8080 (talk · contribs), Redsoxbed (talk · contribs), Mountdragon (talk · contribs) and 84.215.98.211 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 02:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That was fast. Thanks again, Middayexpress (talk) 02:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My name is John and last night I tried to create an account from my house and it said I was banned Jan 27th until April 27th. I was just hoping you could help me since I have never used wiki before.

It said I (IP 98.231.22.5) was banned by Nishkid64 who gave the reason

CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively. This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse. In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions. Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Users: If you already have an account in good standing, you may request IP block exemption to bypass this block. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

: .

I was just hoping you could help me figure this out. Maybe someone was using my internet? I'm not sure, but I was hoping to see the incident that happened. I am sending this from my account I created at school (nflmockdraftaces), but it is in reference to my home IP which is 98.231.22.5

Thanks for your help,

Nflmockdraftaces (talk) 16:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have never been here before and am not even sure if this is what to do... if you could just set me in the right direction. Thanks!! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nflmockdraftaces (talk • contribs) 16:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just blocked... could you check please? Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nishkid64, please see the following edits by 70.112.78.85, Pahar Begum and Saudagar. Also see blocked 72.179.43.74 and Awareoftypes. I have looked around their history pages and I have found striking similarities in their reverts. Banned User:Hkelkar is continually making POV edits with a strong nationalistic agenda and no one cares but me. Is there any chance to stop him? Thanks, Bowhop (talk) 10:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Chawinda&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shalimar_Gardens_(Jammu_and_Kashmir)&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indophobia&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_the_Punjab&action=history

Special:Contributions/86.158.235.164 Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

• Books extension enabled
• News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
• Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. A lot of well trained meats from the Toronto Tamil Club, as usual. I didn't bother to rangecheck them. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 03:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nishkid64. Would you look into the newly registered account, Seventynights (talk · contribs) who appears at the article of South Korea inserting the same extreme POV materials as Ziggymaster did? Thanks. --Caspian blue 17:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick answer!--Caspian blue 18:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Chawinda&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shalimar_Gardens_(Jammu_and_Kashmir)&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indophobia&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_the_Punjab&action=history

Special:Contributions/86.158.235.164 Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I messaged you before, but nothing was done

The links above, plus these below need to be semiprotected

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Poonch_District_(AJK)&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Instrument_of_Accession_(Jammu_and_Kashmir)&action=history

Special:Contributions/86.158.233.205, this was the IP that was vandalizing

Thegreyanomaly (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

86.158.233.205-What is the geographical location of this fellow? YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 02:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 71: We have no shame has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode page, and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes and subscribe to the RSS feed at wikipediaweekly.org. WODUPbot 05:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Could you check the IP for User:Earlyrizer and User:Tablelikedd (see their deleted contributions)? Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK is due for an update. Can you do it? Should be from queue 3. I can give instructions if you need. Shubinator (talk) 17:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've got to go. Instructions for doing the update are here. Shubinator (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update done by Ruhrfisch. Shubinator (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...has caught this user: User talk:Geminibuddah. You're block, so its your call on IPEXEMPT. Could you please respond to their request? Thanks! --Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:59, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for confirming my long-standing belief that Zuminous is a sock of Runtshit. Would it be possible to check other puppetmasters who are themselves likely socks --Truthprofessor, Borisyy and Shmuelsheiman? All three of these exhibit the same pattern as Runtshit/Zuminous: frequent creation of throw-away IDs for edit-warring on specific Middle East-related articles (Truthprofessor on Steven Plaut, Borisyy and Shmuelsheiman on Neve Gordon; defamation and possibly libellous edits; similar tone and language; use of the same unreliable right-wing sources.

I have no doubt that these are all the same person; it would be useful to confirm this. It would also be interesting to check if any of these also made edits using a University of Haifa IP; following the earlier checkuser, both Avruch and I wrote to the IT department there; but neither of us has received any response. If their network is indeed being used for vandalism and defamation, there must be some way we can oblige them to take action on this.

This vandal's disruptive activity has been going on for far too long, and is harming Wikipedia; I hope you can help put a stop to this. RolandR (talk) 10:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

he might be back again . User:Jailstorm and User:Sebastian-566. when you get a chance can you look into it thanx. --Wikireader41 (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, Jailstorm is Nangparbat. Sebastian-566 is  Unrelated. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 14:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nishkid64/Archive 55,

WikiProject Piracy is currently undergoing some updates and changes, and we are trying to find out who is still active in the project. You are currently listed as a participant on the list of participants, and we would like for you to update your status. Please move your name to the section that best describes your activity in the project:

• Active - still active and interested within the scope of the WikiProject.
• Semi-Active - still active on Wikipedia, but not as active in regards to the WikiProject.
• Former Members - a catch-all classification for those editors who are not active on Wikipedia, those that are still on Wikipedia, but no longer part of this WikiProject, or those that have otherwise not moved their names to another classification yet.

Thank you,
Adolphus79 (talk) 16:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thanks for completing the CU request in the above case. Would you be willing to run a check on Countrywomangirl (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) without me re-filing the case at SPI? Countrywomangirl's account was created several hours after Fidodidoman was blocked and all of Countrywomangirl's edits are on the same articles edited by Fidodidoman immediately before he was blocked. In addition, the MO and the writing style are a match.

Please let me know if you can confirm this or if you would prefer that I re-file at SPI.

Thanks! Big Bird (talk • contribs) 21:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you want me to enable AntiAbuseBot's Auto Protect feature for your talkpage? --Chris 07:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enabled --Chris 09:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please sniff out User:阮高治, User:Ben19870923, User:潘佩珠是越南國父 and other new sockpuppets of Nipponese Dog Calvero. Thanks. DHN (talk) 15:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you are the major contributor to the Econ Portal ! or maybe just to the selected feature article. I was going to suggest that Bernard Madoff be put up as the featured article in time for his presumed guilty pleas on Thursday, March 12. But it seems another Keynes article was chosen this month.

BTW, I saw these on Wikinews and was wondering whether they could be made to work on the portal? {{Crude Oil Prices}}

{{Stock Market data}}

Who actually runs the portal anyway?

Any help appreciated.

Smallbones (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not really a major contributor as the editor who usually runs the portal is Nishkid64. I have transcribed your post to his talkpage for his information. Madoff is indeed a good choice for featured article, which is why I added Charles Ponzi to the portal last month. Please feel free to make any changes that you wish. As regards the templates, maybe you could ask the editor who designed them for Wikinews if he might consider creating them for Wikipedia. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 22:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nishkid! When giving CU info, would you be so kind as to user {{checkuser|accountname}} instead of {{user|accountname}}? At least for the confirmed, since it makes it just a bit easier. You also forgot to sign :> Synergy 01:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Synergy 01:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nikshid for quick response in this RFCU . How about those IPs?

BTW, Azturkk is probably MTLL. Azturk has violated WP:Sock. Is there any punishing or preventing measure is required?--St. Hubert (talk) 06:22, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

why did you delete these words?"Azerbaycan türkleri"? see here:

23.Helena Bani-Shoraka. "Language Policy and Language Planning: Some Definitions" in Annika Rabo, Bo Utas. The Role of the State in West Asia, Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, 2005, ISBN 9186884131, 9789186884130, p. 144

24.^ Stephan Thernstrom, Ann Orlov, Oscar Handlin. Harvard Encyclopedia of American ethnic groups, Harvard University Press, 1981, p. 171, quote: In their homeland the Azerbaijanis, or Azeri Turks as they are sometimes called... --Azturkk (talk) 19:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I know who these are, don't you? NawlinWiki (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nish, quick question. For Wallflowers and Song cloth, are we going deny? or should I attempt to tag all of those? :) Synergy 22:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see no point in tagging them. Their MOs are fairly easy to discern, so there's no need for recordkeeping. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 22:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Responded by email. And I concur that they should not be tagged. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

another possible sockpuppet of our old buddy 86.156.208.244 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) thanx--Wikireader41 (talk) 15:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

he is on 86.151.123.189 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) now. can you protect 2002 Kaluchak massacre so it cannot be edited from an ip address. thanx--Wikireader41 (talk) 15:48, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noted your confirmation as a second checkuser confirming this, here [2]. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

could you look over my new article Islamic Extremism among British Pakistanis and help improve it. I think it meets all wikipedia guidelines. could you edit it some or make some suggestions for improvement. Thanx.--Wikireader41 (talk) 23:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanx for your comments. though I do strongly feel that the title Islamic Extremism among British Pakistanis refers to a notable and verifiable phenomenon which deserves inclusion in wikipedia. Not only that it has obvious security implications for those of us who live in the US of A so much so that state dept has been trying to get British Pakistanis to get a visa b4 flying to the states. I have added several more references from credible news sources. let us see what happens. cheers;-)--Wikireader41 (talk) 03:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another technical question. this article does have 'under construction' tag and I believe was tagged for speedy deletion in bad faith by a Pakistan associated editor. He was duly admonished by another administrator for this. i was reading Wikipedia:Deletion of pages under construction#When to delete. it is my intention to work on this article and have this article be fully compliant with all wikipedia policies. it seems this would necessitate withdrawal of nomination for deletion ? is that true if so what is the procedure. thanx a lot--Wikireader41 (talk) 17:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first you would post your plan for fixing the article on the AfD. If it is accepted, then I can close the AfD and let you complete the article (in a timely matter of course - I won't accept any dillydallying). Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 19:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lofty kudos for having your White House photo being used at whitehouse.gov. My photo contributions to Wikipedia have appeared elsewhere on the web but nowhere so prominent. I'm very impressed! --Boston (talk) 01:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 17:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He wants his rollback back which was confiscated after he used it on those Bollywood-Turk socks. Ok? YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 05:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problems here. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect he is a sock of banned Jack.Hartford (talk · contribs · email) / Baron.atreid (talk · contribs · email). Same editing pattern and edit-warring with Hkelkar socks! -59.182.45.221 (talk) 17:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, thanks. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

86.156.208.231 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)--Wikireader41 (talk) 19:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 19:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever I see you, you're doing a good job here at something! Thanks. --Boston (talk) 08:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I presume it is you that recently checked my account (User:SE7). On here - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SE7 - does this mean I'm in the clear now?South-East7™^Talk/_Contribs 23:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked some more if you'd like to check the IPs. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In your conclusion, do you also mean the it is unlikely that there are links between the individual accounts? (as opposed to only trying to link from the supposed sockmaster to the socks) — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 01:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's unlikely that SE7 is related to any of the confirmed socks. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 01:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if SE7 does not control the accounts that have been blocked, it is still likely that SE7 and Punk Rocker know each other. Even though SE7 said that he didn't know DavidJJJ (one of Punk Rocker's socks and his nominator for RfA), his first edit on Wikipedia was made to User:DavidJJJ as shown on his contributions list. GT5162 ^{(我的对话页)} 17:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/86.163.155.254 [3][4][5]

01:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)