Hmm...I actually like it better the way it is. Thanks, though. (I'm a fan of darker colors hehe) --Nishkid64 12:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could add a talk link at "64", though... Nishkid64 Like it? •Sean•gorter•^(Talk) 13:36, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

•Sean•gorter•^{(T) (P)} 10:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

When you delete the page, remember to close the XfD also. :) Best wishes, Xoloz 15:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

You deleted our note-worthy company. Our competitors and industry equals are still listed. Was this a mistake? Tphanich 04:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)tphanich[reply]

You had five days to make any significant changes to the page to persuade our decision to delete the article. Apparently, you did not make these changes, and so I deleted the page according to Wikipedia policy. Before I deleted your article, I checked to see if it was linked to other articles, or if it generated a lot of Google hits. It failed both, so I deleted the page. Please do not re-create the page once it has been deleted, as this violates Wikipedia policy. I am deleting this new re-created page as it violates CSD G4. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me. Nishkid64 19:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have not responded on Quasimoto Interactive. You have made hundreds of deletions without discussion. If there are grounds for our speedy deletion, I request that you explain, or undelete the article. If you still feel it was deleted appropriately, I will re-write the article to compliance, or I humbly request a deletion review.

Okay, I see you left me a second message. I just want to clarify some things. I am 16 years old, and I go to high school in the United States. I do not spend my whole life on Wikipedia, so I would appreciate some patience on your part. Second of all, speedy deletion does not require discussion, and neither do Prods. Speedy deletion is used when it's a definite violation of Wikipedia policy, and it can be deleted without discussion. Prod is a proposed deletion, and a message for a prod is placed on an article page. Any user can remove this prod if they believe that the deletion is not warranted by justifying why it is notable, or if they can make major improvements to the article. The prod was placed on the page on October 3, and following procedure, I was supposed to delete the article on October 8 if no one made any significant edits or any justifications to keep the article (on the talk page). Nothing of that nature happened, so I deleted the article according to procedure. Prods are like speedy deletion, but they have to be kept up for a minimum of 5 days before deletion. There is no formal discussion for prods like an AfD or something, but you can remove the prod from the page, and discuss its deletion with the editor who placed the prod in the first place. If you really thought the article was warranted, you should have done that.

For your page, I know that I went to Google, and I looked at "What links here" to see if the topic of your article was notable. I did not see many Google hits, and I only saw the article linked to 3 other articles (2 of which were just bot-generated prod lists). I don't believe it is a matter of compliance, but really a matter of notability. The company is not notable, and therefore an article should not be placed on Wikipedia for the company. I have been participating in AfD's for a long time, and I have seen many company-related articles similar to Quasimoto get deleted. If you still believe the article should not be deleted, feel free to go to deletion review. Thanks, and happy editing. Nishkid64 19:39, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, no problem. Persistent history of problems, obviously should have known better. Every admin blocks a little differently, for better or worse, I don't think this one's worth fretting over. Regards, Luna Santin 19:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Okay that covers the Spider Baby soundtrack now what about the Actionfolksinger comic book? It's out of print so reviews are out. It's on an internationally recognized comic book resource site but as you said that's only one. If it got talked about on say two more would it then be able to get it's block lifted? Thanks for the help by the way. I promise this will be the last question. Boffotaco 20:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think this one is already closed. The Actionfolksinger comic book is mentioned only on that one independent resource site. I don't know if it's a particularly notable site, so I can't help you there. However, just by doing a Google search, I can see that just doing a Google search only yields 504 hits, a very very small amount. Also, the article links to no other articles, which can lead to verifiability issues. I protected the article itself from being re-created because it had already been deleted three times because users kept making the article. Maybe one day if the comic book becomes immensely popular, then I would reconsider. And don't feel like your questions are a burden or something. It's good to get involved and be curious toward the actions of other users. Nishkid64 20:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page and sig are so colorful I just had to make it match! ;) Sorry, revert at will (does look cool tho!) Glen 21:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phew! Hoped you'd see it like that! Hey I just looked at your monobook.js/css and I dont know how you do it! Try this, click here and press the preview button. What do you think? Glen 21:37, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just realised that without the .js installed that css would look odd (all the links gone!) See here for how it looks for me Note all the new tabs! :) Glen 22:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay!

Glad you like it! Now hit CTRL R for me Glen 23:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm you actually need the tab script in that file so CTRL R for me now (as Ive put the search and other Glen minimalisations back). If you still dont like, then just copy User:Voice of All/monobook.css to yours and try again Glen 23:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm good for now. I removed the css, but kept the monobook and now I got all that I need. (I think). Thanks again. Nishkid64 23:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well Id already tried it so ya may as well CTRL R for me (assuming you use Firefox) - can I teach you all the new functions you've got now? Some are just fu@king awesome! You wait! Glen 23:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just press CTRL and R together, or if you use IE CTRL-F5 which purges your page cache. Hopefully the wikipedia logo goes along with a few other things, but the search is still there and no colored pages. But, more importantly, your new tabs now work! Ill explain upon your reply (say you aint on IRC at all are you?) Glen 23:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have all the tabs. (I ctrl+R a long time ago). I'll get on IRC. What channel are you on? Nishkid64 00:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh, sorry my bad! I thought when you said you were happy with the blank css you perhaps didnt know Id fixed it for you. IRC would be awesome, as I can explain all the new functions to you. Im in irc://chat.freenode.net/vandalism-en-wp and irc://chat.freenode.net/vandalism-en-newusers - nick at the moment is nelg (Glen backwards) Gle 00:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To join the server or the channel? You dont need to join freenode (the server) - you do for the antivandal channels so maybe try irc://asimov.freenode.net/wikipedia first. thats the general wikipedia channel. When you get into the server go

/nick Nishkid64 (or any other nick you may want), then

/nickserv register <password> (choose a password), then

/join #wikipedia

Glen 00:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was testing to see how fast you guys would fix it. Someone vandilzed the Bryan Mccabe part a while back, and it took a day to get it fixed.

It's still vandalism. Nishkid64 01:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please elucidate as to how my creating links to the LAME article from instances of the word's appearance in MP3's article is in error? This is not an "experiment", but an improvement to the article.

24.68.243.82 01:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I thought it was vandalism at first, but I guess I was mistaken. I will remove the warning on your talk page. Nishkid64 01:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 52/6/1 (~90%). It was an interesting process which gave me a chance to learn a bit about myself and about the community. My intention now is to slowly ease into using those additional buttons on my page. No use being over eager and mucking up the works. The support of all those who went over my record and/or rallied to my defense after the big oppose vote was instumental to the success of this review. Again, thank you! --StuffOfInterest 11:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As to deletion policy, 1. WP:PROD is clear that PROD can be contested even after the fact, and would then have to be undeleted and sent to AfD. That's what you should have done when faced with a recreation unless speedyable. 2. WP:CSD G4 clearly does not apply to articles deleted on prod - only to articles which were deleted with full AfD consensus. Thx. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see CrazyRussian said what needed to be said about the redeletion already. The article is at deletion review should you wish to expalin the basis for deletion there. If it is speediable, we need a speedy basis other than G4. GRBerry 13:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

I have submitted to deletion review.

I still feel it was an unjustified deletion. I was never warned to revise the page, not through email or telephone call. Just because something is not listed highly on the Internet does not mean it is not notable. Our company was the first to make arcade games for the home. Our company has patents older than you. It is quite notable I assure you. Our previous web ranking was at 300,000. We have recently changed web servers and our ranking dropped significantly. We are on our way back down. By December, we will be note-worthy again.

There are tons of other companies on Wikipedia that serve no purpose but to advertise themselves.

Let this be the persuasive argument to re-add us into the Wikipedia database.

You keep saying that there are other examples. Where are they? Show me some. There are hundreds of companies added to Wikipedia a day that shouldn't warrant an article, and almost 99% of the time, they are deleted either on the spot, or by prod or AfD. Also, an Alexa ranking of 300,000 is not particularly notable. We have deleted articles about websites that had Alexa rankings as low as 40,000. If you really think your company will be noteworthy in December, then you may come back and check back up on me to see if I and other admins agree on its notability. Otherwise, I believe the company is not notable, and you are just taking advantage of Wikipedia for advertising purposes. Finally, don't keep making references to my age. I may be 16, but that has no relevance to my competence as an admin. I was voted to be an admin based on my maturity, behavior, and helpfullness on Wikipedia. Besides, the number of patents should not really justify a company's article on Wikipedia. Heck, my father has around 15-20 chemical patents himself, but he's not on here. Nishkid64 21:20, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree your age should be irrelevant, however, that was only mentioned, as a derrogatory remark, once. If you are getting very touchy on the subject, maybe you have a problem with it. I do apologize for the remark. If someone said that to me when I was 16 I would be a tad miffed as well.

After reading the deletion reviews I have the option of proving my company's notability, or forgetting about Wikipedia. I once thought it to be a valuable source, arguing with my own college professors, but I see that you cannot communicate clearly through the Internet, thus you have spam, have nonesense, and everything else that can go wrong in a public forum.

The companies that I believe we are as noteworthy are Madcatz and Pelican Accessories.

You let me know if they aren't noteworthy and I'll drop my case against Wikipedia. As the Marketing Director for our company, I find it a disadvantage for us to not be as noteworthy as our competitors. The page I had created was simply to provide information on our company's acheivements and technology that's been created through our engineering efforts.

Furthermore, if your father holds useful patents that have purpose in life, then is he on Wikipedia? Why? Why not? I helped create and maintain the Online Guitar Archive. I don't have an article on Wikipedia either.

You don't understand. You brought up my age as a derogatory comment in the deletion review just because you thought it made a difference in my judgment. I can care less what some person thinks about my age. At the time you added that comment to DRV, I just wanted to know why it was added and what relevance it had, but I guess the problem is solved now, so let's drop the issue.

One of the other reasons why there is no support for keeping the article in the DRV is because you are only using Wikipedia as means of advertising. It seems you just made this account to make that one article, and you yourself said you were the marketing director of the company, and you most probably were trying to advertise your company with this article. Pelican Accessories appeared to be notable at first (from Google and "what links here"), but from taking a look at the Alexa ranking, I started to doubt myself. Their website has an Alexa ranking of around 2,000,000 and I speculate that most of the hundreds of thousands of G-hits I got were probably either done by Googlebombing or just advertisements on websites. I am actually considering putting the article up for AfD. It doesn't seem too notable, but I may be wrong (not much a video gamer nowadays, so I'm not all into this accessories stuff).

Finally, my father does have 15-20 patents that are important to what he does. He is an synthetic chemist at Hoffmann-La Roche, and all of his patents are new potent chemical compounds and molecules that can be used to fight diseases. In fact, one of his compounds is currently in Stage II of FDA drug testing, and may be out in the market in a few years. But he's not on Wikipedia, because he isn't notable. Sure, he's written his share of papers, but he does not have something majorly important as compared to Leo Sternbach, a former HLR chemist who was famous for making the blockbuster pain reliever drug Valium (made billions of dollars annually 20-30 years back). Anyway, I understand that your reasons for wanting to have the article on Wikipedia, and I respect it, but I just don't believe your company is notable in general. Nishkid64 21:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anon ips have been putting propaganda sites as links and vandalizing the article into rubbish. I reverted to the best possible edit. However, the article needs to be sourced and some POV removed. Could you please look into it? Thanks.Hkelkar 01:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I will look into it tomorrow. I was just about to go in like 10 minutes, and I will do a proper look-through tomorrow. Thanks for letting me know. Nishkid64 01:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalisms still persist (I just reverted another anon).Please get the article protected.Hkelkar 23:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering why exactly you reverted my addition regarding the term "pothead". I realize it may have sounded tacked-on, but I felt that a term as common as "pothead" deserved some kind of representation. After all, the only practical reason the stoner article even exists is to describe its respective slang term. G Rose 04:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I only reverted your edit because I thought it wasn't really necessary for the article (which is why I didn't warn you). If you want to add it back, do so in an encyclopedic fashion, so that it won't look like it was just "tacked-on". Thanks. Nishkid64 19:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU for so quickly fixing my Linear arithmetic synthesis article on October 8.

Keep up the good work.

Sorry for that user talk thing a couple days ago. I didn't know it would be considered vandalis and I'm happy you corrected it, I was just trying to help. And nice pages, how did you get it this way? Also, how did you get yourname to be so colorful. Thanks! 71.236.79.160 20:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nishkid! I came across your colurful image and wish to "borrow" and use it on my page. So I thought I should ask first before I use it. Thanks in advance no matter what you say! Randfan 21:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I'm glad you like it. User:Glen S made it for me, so you better check with him first. I would think that he wouldn't mind since he gave it to me. Nishkid64 21:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Thank you!

You state your user page has been 'vandalised many times'. Wouldn't it make sense to just put a protection on it? Realistically, nobody had any real right to do anything to your own page but you. Or would that me misusing an ability or something?--HalfShadow 01:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would only really need to protect my page if I was constantly being attacked by vandalism. I am not, so I don't really think I need to protect the page. Anyway, there are bots and other users that can revert it in a snap, so there are no worries. Nishkid64 01:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering, really. You know:'Every question I ask is something learned' and all that.--HalfShadow 01:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, well keep wondering. You seem to be doing well so far (I've check out your edits :-P), and this curiosity can only make you improve. Don't feel shy to ask me questions at any time. Nishkid64 01:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got a scanner last week. That along with my absolute unwillingness to throw away anything of potential value will probably be quite useful here. I have stuff I don't even know I have...--HalfShadow 01:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how ya doing? Your doing a great job with the daily stock reports on the B&E portal. Id give you a barnstar, but i dunno how to use photoshop, my bad. One question tho-isnt it worth putting on the News in the Business and economic portal that the DJIA surpassed its record close (i forgot when and what the close was, but i think you know what i mean, if not then go here DJIA)? Good job becoming a leader in B&E!!! Xlegiofalco 07:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I was considering it, but two things made me reconsider. First of all, there was no article for the news item on WikiNews. Second of all, the DJIA reached its all-time high a few times already this week. There's no point in constantly adding news items about the average reaching its all-time high. Also, you don't use photoshop to make a barnstar. Most barnstars are already custom-made and all you have to do is put in the template. See WP:Barnstars for more. Nishkid64 19:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I came across the article some time ago and I must tell you that I was disgusted. I however tried to stay away as I was in the middle of other really hot edit wars on the subject of Khalistan. However, user:Hkelkar's edits have changed the tone of the article to a great extent and it is a lot closer to reality now. All we need is a few references. I will try to add a few. One particular item I would love to see a citation on is the sectionBhindranwale#early_life (the BBC stuff). I know I read it somewhere, I can't remember where. The article seems to be in sane hands for now so I don't see the need for a protection. But we will have to keep watching as I see an edit war in the making. Cheers! Syiem 09:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could I steal your User:Nishkid64/Toolbox? :) It's a wondertool... NCurse _work 17:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Stealing from someone who had been stealing from an other user is the best way to steal. :) NCurse _work 19:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed you reverting some vandalism in Penicillin extremely fast, and wonder if there is some automated way to catch that stuff. I just look at the Recent Changes file occasionally and apply some rules of thumb, but I'm sure there must be something better. EdJohnston 20:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I used to use VandalProof, AmiDaniel's client that shows recent changes and has buttons to quickly revert edits. At the moment, I am using Lupin's Anti-vandal tool which has proved to be very effective in catching the usual types of vandalism (it searches certain words such as expletives and deragotory comments). It works amazingly well and I'm able to revert many pages in short time. Nishkid64 20:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, As the instigator of the test5 change, I've just added a response to your question on User talk:Voice of All page. I'm off to bed in a wee bit, but wouldn't mind if we can look to get a common approach on all of the level 5 warnings. Cheers Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 23:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting my RfA!

Atlant 00:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supports #53 and #64. Make up your mind. :P – Chacor 02:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ginkgo100

Supports #11 and #30. :P – Chacor 05:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]