Hi Nath2081! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

"Adi shakti" hardly appears in scriptures and most WP:RS use Mahadevi as the name of the Supreme Goddess..245CMR.•^👥📜 12:33, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Skyerise. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sadasiva, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 245CMR. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sati (Hindu goddess) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

Note: Don't change sourced content as per your will and don't add unsourced things..245CMR.•^👥📜 15:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Para Brahman. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mahadevi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you..245CMR.•^👥📜 04:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mahadevi, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MRRaja001 ^(talk) 06:22, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mahadevi. MRRaja001 ^(talk) 06:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok next time before changing I will prove a reliable source. Nath2081 (talk) 08:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive me I won't do this again

Nath2081 (talk) 07:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mahadevi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you..245CMR.•^👥📜 04:24, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mahadevi, you may be blocked from editing.

Don't remove sourced content and don't add you unsourced pov..245CMR.•^👥📜 04:41, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mahavidya. .245CMR.•^👥📜 05:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. .245CMR.•^👥📜 05:12, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]