Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, NBAGreats! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 06:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Salina, Kansas have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Salina, Kansas was changed by NBAGreats (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883367 on 2021-10-01T20:25:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chicago Bulls have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chicago Bulls was changed by NBAGreats (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919923 on 2021-11-14T03:10:56+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Black Art (poem). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dylan620 (talk) 03:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Louisville, Kentucky have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Louisville, Kentucky was changed by NBAGreats (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916178 on 2021-12-03T03:51:50+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Adam Silver seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 05:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ben Cohen (businessman). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:30, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at I Got You (Split Enz song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Muzilon (talk) 02:30, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Roberta Kaplan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please note the WP:EPOCHTIMES is not a reliable source. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 21:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roberta Kaplan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please note I reverted your recent addition to this article, but a version that complies with the biographies of living people, no original research, and no point of view policies may be appropriate to include in a related article. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Beccaynr (talk) 21:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  17:29, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An excellent suggestion. Should I do that even when it's a "minor edit." Thanks for reaching out. I started editing as a class project and I want to do this the correct way. The NBA is the place! And the WNBA (talk) 02:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Popehat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Style. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]