Please slow down and look at what you are doing. You are reverting and warning users for archiving talk page content. -- Tcncv (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalizing on my user page. Nsaa (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you adopt me Greenman2020 (talk) 04:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello some one with IP address 122.169.214.33 has emptied all sections in the article Chiranjeevi on 19th june. Could you please restore the article to previously valid 18th june version? Thanks in advance. Alexander227 (talk) 16:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mygerardromance,

I've started to clean up the Adopters' list. You appear to appear to have been editing only sporadically in the last months. I wonder if you're still interested in adopting new users. If you're not interested any more, would you mind removing yourself? Thank you and happy editing, Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 12:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it was unnecessary for you to revert the edit Usertest1253 made to my sandbox, being that is my alternate account I am using for my test edits which is clearly mention on both user pages. Next time please think before reverting edits to a sandbox. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 20:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I thank you for reverting edits that have not aired as of yet, as in the case of one of two created reality/game TV articles, Love in the Wild (the other is It's Worth What?). Because of such, I am currently watching the article and will make the appropriate edits, as well as watching the show itself (for watching the show, however, please see my user page for time zone). Also, you may also see the article's talk page since I am particularly concerned with vandalism in those article(s). CHAK 001 (talk) 04:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: I do use Twinkle for reverting most vandalism within such articles. CHAK 001 (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	A barnstar for you! Tallahassle (talk) 18:46, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]