Userboxes This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify) This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify) This user is a recent changes patroller. This user uses Huggle to deal with vandalism. This user is a participant in the esports task force. This user has an SHA-512 committed identity. See /Committed identity. This user has been on Wikipedia for 15 years, 6 months and 6 days.

Hello, I'm Jomontgeorge. I noticed that the song Gudilo Badilo Madilo Vodilo from the film DJ: Duvvada Jagannadham is very popular and can you make article "Gudilo Badilo Madilo Vodilo". Thank you. Jomontgeorge 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Ironically, I appear to have emailed you only bare minutes after you already weighed in at File talk:Nex Benedict.png#Contested deletion. My apologies for any annoyance or presumption on my part! — Fourthords | =Λ= | 19:59, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, your email is welcome. Thank you for defending my position in my absence. Melmann 20:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pertaining to Heard Well

Noticed you prefered to have replies regarding reverts on your talk page so reposting here, for safety's sake.

I did attach a source in the revert, and in my initial submission (which was reverted by 47.154.30.23 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heard_Well&oldid=1219589584). The sources were taken from previous submissions made by Yourlocalforecast and 2.27.185.145 (see Yourlocalforecast here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heard_Well&oldid=1219342271 see 2.27.185.145 here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heard_Well&oldid=1219265171) The referenced source, a video made by Jojo (13 April 2024) [1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJDmEqLX6iI. The allegations made by the source is corroberated by various other content creators in the comments of the video.

I thus consider Jojo (13 April 2024) to be a valid source and the reverts made by 47.154.30.23 in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heard_Well&oldid=1219712973 to be unjustified. If you have any critique against using the Jojo (13 April 2024) source I would like to hear them as 47.154.30.23 did not provide ample justification as to why Jojo (13 April 2024) cannot be considered a valid source for this article.

Middovaar (talk) 11:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.s. Awaiting response or critique from you before restoring/discarding the information I added Middovaar (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Middovaar Hi. Youtubers are not normally considered to be a reliable source. Please reviewer WP:RS and WP:SOCIALMEDIA. Melmann 21:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Melmann, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Spicy (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]