An article you recently created, Paul Curtis (footballer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed, 511KeV ^(talk) 06:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Michalanney and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:11, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MelbourneFan2022! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:11, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry McKay (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Jake Stringer, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 06:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Karl Amon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 17:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nat Fyfe, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 13:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Jake Stringer. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 09:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Michalanney and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liam Henry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tammin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, why do you keep changing the format in footballers infoboxes (like in this edit)? The {{0}} is intended to keep the spacing so that the numbers align properly. --SuperJew (talk) 08:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Hugh Davies (footballer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 02:05, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Warning @MelbourneFan2022: You must respond to the ANI discussion here. Either that, or you must never repeat the kinds of edits referred to in that report. You have been here a year but have never used a talk page. That's fine, but if problems arise, as in this case, you must respond to other editors or must avoid the problems. The issue raised at the ANI discussion is trivial but, according to other editors, it is disruptive. Communication is required and I will have to indefinitely block you if disruption continues. Johnuniq (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Adding a permalink to the discussion so we can reference it later if needed. Will add that per MF2022's contributions, they have been online since the first 3 comments on the WP:ANI and since the first message about it here, and therefore doesn't seem they are interested in communicating. --SuperJew (talk) 08:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Johnuniq, seems they're not listening (see here). 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 13:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Johnuniq, a few more in the last ten days [1][2][3][4], and another in the last few hours [5]. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 02:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MelbourneFan2022: Thank you for your edits but WP:Communication is required and I have had to block your ability to edit articles for two weeks. Please respond here by adding a comment to show that you understand that there is a problem. The issue is minor, namely that you repeatedly remove formatting that other editors have inserted (the {{0}} template). However the serious problem is that you have not responded to concerns expressed earlier. As I wrote above, you must either avoid the problem or engage with other editors and discuss the issue. Questions can be asked here or at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 03:31, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Johnuniq, disruptive editing has continued – another of the above edits here, as well as this (for context, McKay has simply nominated Essendon as his preferred new home; the player hasn't moved clubs yet, and there's still a possibility that it won't happen). Seems that they haven't learned. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 11:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. He has put that as his new home and as Essendon are interested in McKay and that because he is a unrestricted free agent meaning he can leave if he wants North Melbourne can’t do anything about him leaving which is why I added that. MelbourneFan2022 (talk) 00:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit you removed six instances of {{0}} from Adam Treloar. Why did you do that? Johnuniq (talk) 03:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because they aren’t needed, aren’t they? MelbourneFan2022 (talk) 04:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong and wrong; McKay is a restricted free agent, so the offer can still be matched, and even if he wasn't, you still don't make the change until the transfer goes through, as pre-emptive edits like the one that you made are considered disruptive. Otherwise, it's typical to use the {{0}} in player infoboxes to align the totals to the right if, for example, one is two digits and the other is three, and you've been asked countless times not to change. Johnuniq, this is the first time that MelbourneFan2022 has commented on a talk page of any kind (not hard to guess why) – where was this response in the initial discussion? They chose not to respond and yet this continues... 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 04:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for raising the issue but it would be better if side issues were discussed at another time or place. Johnuniq (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn’t realise this. I won’t remove them from future edits. MelbourneFan2022 (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MelbourneFan2022: Has anyone ever raised the issue of {{0}} wikitext with you before? Have you performed similar removals in the past and been reverted? Have you discussed use of the template with anyone? Johnuniq (talk) 05:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MelbourneFan2022: I have no idea why you are unable to reply to my questions. However, I see your 23:57, 23 September 2023 statement above. It is absurd that you think "I didn’t realise this" is a believable response after the messages on this page at 08:23, 25 April 2023 and 03:31, 21 May 2023, not to mention the notification on 02:05, 30 April 2023 for this ANI discussion. Next time you see dozens of articles with some wikitext that you do not understand, leave it alone. This has wasted a lot of time and I will block you indefinitely if there is any further trouble. Johnuniq (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it may not seem true but it is I just didn’t think that they were needed but in future I will leave things that I don’t understand alone so I don’t mess anything up. MelbourneFan2022 (talk) 02:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Max Michalanney, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A quick Google search will show you quite enough secondary sources and notability. If it's important for you to have good, notable articles, you can do some work and not just draftify/delete everything hoping that other editors will do it for you. --SuperJew (talk) 12:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reuben Ginbey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reuben Ginbey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Corey Warner, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Corey Warner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hugh Davies (footballer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Gold Coast Suns coaches, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nat Fyfe, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 12:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 AFL season. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 02:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

We don't add teams until a person has actually played a match for the side in that season. I think I've reverted the cases where you've done this but perhaps you might like to check that I've not missed any. Thanks.

We also idon'thave five columns available in the infobox. If you add another column you simply get an error flag raised and it won't show. Blue Square Thing (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Darcy Cameron

added a link pointing to Albany

Deven Robertson

added a link pointing to Northam

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MelbourneFan2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Corey Warner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GMH Melbourne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately the article is yet to meet wikipedia's notability criteria. I suggest tagging this draft with the Template:Promising draft tag and waiting for more sources that meet WP:GNG to become available to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Corey Warner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

––– GMH MELBOURNE 10:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MelbourneFan2022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carlton leading goalkickers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Corey Warner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The-Pope (talk) 03:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]