Hello, MaxHarmony, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

–Sango123 (e) 23:58, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Sam Spade (Software), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Sam Spade (Software). You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 21:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you rename me? The reason why I want to be renamed is that I want to have the same Wikipedia version I'm registered. --Franc000 (talk) 14:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only bureaucrats are allowed to change usernames. Max.diems (talk) 14:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a heads-up that a userbox you have on your pages (media is brainwashing tool) has changed location to User:Sappho'd/Userboxes/MainMediaBS

Cheers. Drywontonmee (talk) 09:43, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 14:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested in your claim that Agnapostate is a member of the National Youth Rights Association. Because - er.. despite making some reasonable edits he does appear to be a throwaway account in the POV-troll tradition of pedophilia article editing. If this is just something he said, he is almost certainly having you on. forestPIG^(grunt) 09:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At last check, he's got 7,050 posts on the NYRA forums. MaxHarmony (talk) 19:24, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if this is the case - I would suggest that he has been mistaken for a pedophile (sympathiser). There is a great deal of paranoia surrounding the issue of reincarnations of banned accounts, and this also goes onto decisions regarding blocks. forestPIG^(grunt) 14:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/October 2008#MaxHarmony. SoxBot X (talk) 19:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User confirmation

Happy birthday Max! In a decade or two, you'll make OTD! Oh, and do share the cake...

Happy Birthday, MaxHarmony, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day! Puchiko (Talk-email)

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reference for your addition to this page ("the genitals")? Is it something you've personally encountered? DTLHS (talk) 07:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaxHarmony (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I use a private proxy (my own VPS) to avoid sniffing/analysis when using public or otherwise insecure wifi networks. While my VPS's IP (178.63.126.57) is not an open proxy, the IP range as a whole is blocked as an open proxy. rDNS will confirm the IP is associated with the host vps.maxh.me.uk; WHOIS lookup will confirm I am the registrant for this domain. I am willing to provide any other evidence asked for (within reason) to confirm this is not an open proxy. MaxHarmony (talk) 03:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

These days, blocks of web host ranges are sometimes marked with 'webhostblock' to clarify that no actual open proxy needs to be found. It seems unlikely to me that the webhostblock will be lifted. You would be better off asking for IP block exemption, which you could try at WP:Sockpuppet investigations#Quick CheckUser requests. When you do so, specify the block message that you see. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:45, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MaxHarmony (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As above, with clarification that I am requesting an IPBE, not really an unblock per se; the block message specifies that this template is the appropriate way to do so. (Since my user talk is the only page I am not blocked from editing, even absent such suggestion there'd not be much other option.)

Decline reason:

Most editors create a valid alternate account and link them together appropriately to overcome insecure wireless/network issues. IPBE is not used to grant access through connections that Wikipedia considers problematic (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It appears that you have a choice of IPs to use, since you have been editing articles today with this account. The next passing admin is unlikely to grant you IPBE without consulting a checkuser. The practice regarding IPBE has tightened recently. It would probably save you time if you use your functioning IP and go over to WP:SPI as I recommended above. EdJohnston (talk) 05:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Max. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!

Hello MaxHarmony! Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk) For more information about Wiki Loves Pride, → click here ←.

RachelWex 16:50, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Question: How'd you do the Keybase proof at User:MaxHarmony/KeybaseProofTest? I didn't think Keybase did Wikipedia profile links.
• Comment: There's a userbox for Keybase users at {{User:UBX/Keybase}} if you want to check it out. Cheers. — AfroThundr ^(t•c) 18:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Muff, County Donegal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 07:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Form 1099-NEC, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sam-2727 (talk) 14:06, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaxHarmony. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Form 1099-NEC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, MaxHarmony. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Form 1099-NEC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:20, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]