Hello, MartinKassemJ120! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rodolfo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rudolf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marshall (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglophone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christian (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cristian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Boulos

added a link pointing to Paul

Maryam (name)

added a link pointing to Mary

Pedro

added a link pointing to Boutros

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

there is no long e /eː/ or long o /oː/ in Modern Standard Arabic! and if it's found it's only in foreign words, only the diphthongs /aj/ and /aw/ occur. but the long vowels do occur in most dialects, including mine. [[User:|عربي-٣١]] (talk) 04:25, 22 Septemberː 2016 (UTC)

@عربي-٣١: I am well aware that it is nominally pronounced /aj/ in Classical Arabic. However, /eː/ is the much more common pronunciation, even for speaking MSA, thus it is listed there instead. For example, most speakers pronounce غير and بيت as /ɣeːr/ and /beːt/ rather than /ɣajr/ and /bajt/. It is mentaioned in notes that some dialects still pronounce it as /aj/ and not /eː/ MartinKassemJ120 (talk) 10:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MartinKassemJ120: No way!, pronouncing /aj/ as /eː/ is only considered correct in dialects and not considered correct at all when speaking educated Modern Standard Arabic at all and it's not common either, not for news anchors nor when reciting a religious script! what Arabic country did you study in? and why don't you apply the same rule to /aw/ that turns into /oː/? the notes are clearly wrong. in my dialect we say غير /ɣeːr/ and فوق /foːg/ but in Classical/Modern Standard Arabic فصحى it is /ɣajr/ and /fawq/. even in Arabic cartoons which are mostly in Modern Standard Arabic they pronounce it as an /aj/ and /aw/ you can check them out, and from my point of view old cartoons have a good pronunciation of Standard Arabic in general. عربي-٣١ (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@عربي-٣١: I've never heard /aj/ instead of /eː/ (except with the name Faysal) in MSA, not in the News or Qur'an recitations either. As far as /aw/ instead of /oː/, I was always taught it was to be pronounced that way and only Saudi and Gulf Arabs pronounce it as /oː/ and heard it pronounced as /aw/ in all other context. As for where I studied, I live in the US and was taught Lebanese Arabic mostly by my father and learned Modern Standard in Arabic School, but I don't see that as very relevant. MartinKassemJ120 (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MartinKassemJ120: well i don't know how well the Arabic teachers at your school were if they can't pronounce the diphthongs correctly haha, you should hear the News better and in Qur'an recitation no one ever says /eː/ it's incorrect especially in Qur'an. and for dialects /oː/; is used by Sudanese, Egyptians, Syrians, Jordanians, Saudis, other gulf Arabs except for Lebanese who use /aw/ and sometimes /oː/, and North Africans who use only /uː/. Even the Lebanese use /aj/ they say هيك /hajk/ instead of /heːk/ (which the Syrians use) but pronounce كيف /kajf/ as /kiːf/ for some reason while we pronounce it as /keːf/ in Saudia. where in Lebanon is your family originally from? and now that i saw from your profile that you're religious and shi't, i'm wondering if the Shi'ts read the Qur'an with a slight different pronunciation? and hope i'm not offending you in anyway and if so, i'm sorry :)عربي-٣١ (talk) 23:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

@عربي-٣١: Well, you've proven yourself to know far more about Arabic than me, so it will be listed as /aj/. But I must ask, why aren't السلام عليكم, Beyrout and Hussein, just to name a few, pronounce with /aj/? (As for your question about Shia, no, same Quran, same pronuncciation. I've also prayed with Sunnis at parties/dinners who seem to pronounce /aj/ as /eː/, particularly in السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ

at the end MartinKassemJ120 (talk) 10:47, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MartinKassemJ120: in Modern Standard and Classical Arabic السلام عليكم is "only" pronounced as /assalaːmu ʕalajkum/ and a lot of the times even in dialects, most Saudis would say /assalaːmu ʕalajkum/ or /assalaːmu ʕaleːkum/ when speaking their dialect but "only" the first one when reciting qur'an or speaking Standard/Classical/Formal Arabic, and for بيروت it is only pronounced it as /bajruːt/ in both Standard and even for most Arabic dialects (and i believe for most Arabic-speakers /beːruːt/ sounds so weird in my opinion) and حُسَيْن is the same only /ħusajn/ in Standard/literally Arabic, but i noticed that Shi'it religious people pronounce it as /ħuseːn/ for some reason. see even in the way you wrote "السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ" there is a Fatħa on the Lām and a sukūn on the Yā' which means it's "alaykum" not "alēkum" in Standard/Classical Arabic. the switch from /aj/ > /eː/ and /aw/ > /oː/ should be and is only acceptable in Dialects. عربي-٣١ (talk) 03:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Sabri, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MartinKassemJ120. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Spanish pronunciation could be included an an appropriate place in the article, but the infobox at the top of the article is NOT such a place, for a number of reasons, including that Spanish played no part on the transmission path from Hebrew/Aramaic down through Greek and Latin, ultimately to English... AnonMoos (talk) 17:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ariel (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asadullah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fredrik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MartinKassemJ120. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source, as you have done on the Lebanese Air Force article. What you placed as a source “sipri”, has no meaning. - Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources –Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 19:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the cited source entitled (»Generalplan Ost« zur Versklavung osteuropäischer Völker.] "Generalplan Ost for the enslavement of East European peoples") it supports the text "Er stellte einen sorgfältig geplanten Rassen- und Völkermord dar) plan for the genocide and ethnic cleansing on a vast scale," [1] There should be no dispute now, the source supports the edit, period.-Case closed.--Woogie10w (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Woogie10w: I was referring to this source: [2] While it does mention "forced labor of Foreign Nationals", it states the overall focus was deportation and colonization and no mention of "genocide on a mass scale". I am aware of the source you listed, but I don't consider it reliable as it was written by a Marxist historian ([3]) and published on a website dedicated to Rosa Luxemburg. While I do not consider it outright false, I do consider it extraordinarily biased and might violate Wikipedia's rules on identifying reliable sources Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. MartinKassemJ120 (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC) MartinKassemJ120[reply]

I guess that you can't read German, say is that so?--Woogie10w (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Woogie10w: I am currently learning German and I have a mediocre understanding, but I do regularly check various dictionaries to verify meaning of certain words. German, like Arabic, is a complex language MartinKassemJ120 (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC) MartinKassemJ120[reply]

I grew up in Manhattan and in university I was sent to speech therapy because I spoke like the characters in Mean Streets, I spent four summers in Germany learning German. Anyway check out on You Tube Mean Streets - $10 on a $2,000 debt. Regards --Woogie10w (talk) 21:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MartinKassemJ120. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bad Turn Worse. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea whether you attend a class with the director, or if he told you the budget of that film. Per WP:BURDEN, you should not restore this content until you cite a reliable source. Original research, such as "someone told me", is forbidden by Wikipedia policy. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]