See Kosovo talk page, if anybody is interested in my discussion with Ilirpz. I am not recomending that.

My contributions in Kosovo, Dardania, Serbia articles have aroused special interest among certain users. They are so eager to show all my contributions. I am grateful for that interest, but my discussion page serve another matter.

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Dardania (Europe). Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Telex 15:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brankovic's territory in kosovo articel wat is that. Give us a document wich is accepti als soch area from both sides. I mean fro the serba an the ottomans. I can say thet the teritory in Afganistan is HIPIs teritory but that no body is going to accept. How do you think only beacose is no document about the war area in afanistan I have the right to say that --Hipi Zhdripi

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]- Hipi [6] - Hipi [7]-Hipi [8]- Hipi

You provocat my to start vandaling the Srbian articel. For everybody else, He is vandalin all Kosovo articels and if no Administrator or Byrocrat is going to stop him. If they don t stop him the only way is going to be to vandalisait the serbian articel. I dont wont that but he wont that. And dont forget he is a socepuper. -- Hipi Zhdripi

Hi Manojlo, Welcome to Wikipedia. As you possibly know already, the Kosovo article is a very controversial one. Therefore and in order to minimise possible edit wars (which basically means people start reverting the article way tooo back and then losing all recent edits), please try to discuss any major edits beforehand. Also, you have marked most of your changes as a minor edit. This is not right. A minor edit generally implies trivial changes only, such as typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes and rearranging of text without changing any content. Therefore, any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it involves one word. The distinction between major and minor edits is significant because you may decide to ignore minor edits when viewing recent changes; logged-in users can even set their preferences to not display them. No one wants to be fooled into ignoring a significant change to an article simply because it was marked "minor." So remember to consider the opinions of other editors when choosing this option. Regards, --Asterion ^{talk to me} 18:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

as a newguy, I know that this is all new to you - we've all passed through it. So I would advise you to be a little more friendly to User:Ilir_pz and cooperative on the Kosovo article. Reading some Wikipedia policies (like WP:NPOV and WP:POV for instance) wouldn't hurt either.

Regards, New Wikipedian. --HolyRomanEmperor 19:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one welcomed you properly, let me do it:

Welcome!

Hello, Manojlo~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --HolyRomanEmperor 19:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

see: Talk:History of Kosovo -- Hipi Zhdripi

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week Belgrade was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help…

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

====Regarding reversions[9] made on May 4 2006 (UTC) to Kosoovo====

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 8 hours. William M. Connolley 12:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E, Manojlo, vidis kakva je to gamad, blokirali te zbog nekog clanka koji se zove Kosoovo, a taj clanak ni ne postoji. Imbecili... --serbiana - talk 00:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed your work on Kosovo-related topics, so I believe you may want to join WikiProject countering anti-Serb bias I just created. Nikola 21:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should support this. Cheers --TheFEARgod (listening) 12:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you edit Rudjer Boscovich from Croat to Serb? Rudjer Boscovich was half Croatian, half Italian. No prrof exist of him being Serb or being of a Serbian family. The article does make mention of his "possible" (unrealistic) Serb origin down the page which should satisfy you. READ IT OK.

Please leave the article as is. The top of the page should refer to him as Croat and having a Croat father, that is the more accepted view as known worldwide. The Serb version in just bs, but I don't see a problem mentioning it down the page, as some Serbs think it's true. We need to be fair if you have that belief,no harm in mentioning it.

God Bless Jagoda 1 05:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo je Srpsko. Albanici imaju pravo ako verujes da su oni poreklu Illyrian. Ako su Albanci Illyrian oni imaju pravo na celu staru Jugoslaviju including Kosovo. Ima dokaza da jesu Albanici Illyrian ali i Srbi su mesani sa Illyrians. Ko ce pobedit rat za Kosovo? Albanci jer na kraju Srbi ne zele vise zivit tu.

Ja sam Crno Gorac, roditelji iz Boke poreklu. Za mene je svejedno.

Ancient History - Dalmatia je bila kao Yugoslavia POGLEDAJ STARE MAPE , a Dalmatinci jesu Albanici donekle. Tako cujem i citao sam.

God Bless Jagoda 1 05:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox al-Qaeda attacks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. --— Indon (reply) — 15:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

01:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

15:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]