Welcome, Macaw 54!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions!
You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself.
You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.
I would suggest a look through our policies and guidelines.
If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum.
I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions.

- Zapptastic at 09:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When an article gets big, the best thing to do is split it by putting certain sections into their own articles. The T article is still big even without the pronuncation section merged in (56KB; when it is merged in it is 75KB.) Georgia guy 19:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that dividing big articles is the best thing to do. They're not different subjects, and the page loads fine on almost any computer. This is why our article count is so inflated, because we keep on creating entries like this. Noone will care about it if it's called "Pronunciation of English T [sic]." And, no one (including me) will want to edit such an obscure entry.--Macaw 54 23:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Naconkantari 23:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You say that I violated 3RR on T. However, only what you are referring to as the 2nd-4th of my reverts are reverts. The first of these was just a split of the article, not a revert of anything. Georgia guy 23:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to say this, but the T article, with your edits, is now 82KB. Do you really think it's a good idea to try to make articles as big as you like?? Georgia guy 19:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Without a doubt.--Macaw 54 00:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer this question:

How big do you plan on making the T article?? Georgia guy 13:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I predict that I won't write too much more. But, it's hard to say for certain until I've looked through all of the literature about the letter.

--Macaw 54 07:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right here, big guy. - The Lake Effect 05:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Holy mother of WOW! Man, I wish more people would research and reference a subject as well as you did this one. I thought it was a copyvio! Google came up negative and when I scrolled down a bit further, I saw the bibliography.

Unfortunately, it DOES appear to be a copyvio. JPG-GR 06:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Bummer. Oh, well; still smiling. It's Friday/Saturday. - Lucky 6.9 06:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mozarabic art, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.artnet.com/library/06/0601/T060103.ASP, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Mozarabic art. Then you should do one of the following:

• Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Mozarabic art where we can find that note; or
• Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mozarabic art.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! JPG-GR 06:38, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• You betcha. Have fun. - Lucky 6.9 06:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's the first time I've seen it. I assumed some wierd browser Netscape 2.0 or something. I've attempted communicating via it's talk page. But he/she/it doesn't seem to notice. Megapixie 10:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This one. Although a scan with Nmap showed that some of the ports are "open," . This allows the user in question to pretend to have a different IP address. Of course, it could also be a legitimate user in that organization. Backslashes are a problem associated with proxy servers that run Unix.--Macaw 54 02:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I checked again, and although a lot of ports are open on his computer, it doesn't look like outside users can connect easily. Sorry about that. I don't think it's his browser, though.--Macaw 54 07:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi !

If you are fr:Discussion Utilisateur:Macaw 54, I wrote a message for you there. --ArséniureDeGallium 05:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Transit Way Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Terminator 3 Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]