Cannabis Ruderalis

Flag icons in infoboxes[edit]

Greetings. Just now, you made made an edit that restored a flag icon to the infobox of this article. Please be aware that per MOS:INFOBOXFLAG the use of such flag icons for an article such as this is no supported. I am reverting your restoration of the flag icon. If you have questions about this, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC) @Hammersoft: okay, thanks. M.k.m2003 (talk) 20:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Parthian Empire[edit]

  1. War =/= Warfare
  2. Don't change the background color of that template without providing a valid reason. What's the point of that golden color? --Wario-Man (talk) 06:38, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wario-Man: I have no reason But I think it was a good color, Usually such patterns are colored. Better you add color. thanks M.k.m2003 (talk) 08:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The default color is OK. Could you show me some colorful history templates/navboxes? Or why the golden color is better than the default one? What formatting or style guideline? --Wario-Man (talk) 07:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Wario-Man. You have been changing bridge-related templates to use a dark brown background colour (example diff). But this offers very poor contrast with the dark blue text, and is hard to read. The default is fine. Citobun (talk) 01:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the color, MOS:COLOR is a good guideline to look at about contrast. —C.Fred (talk) 01:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of castles in Iran. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Hi sorry my english is poor, Can you give another explanation And is this a big problem? Thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 13:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you copy from one Wikipedia article to another you are supposed to say in your edit summary at the destination article that you have copied and what the source was. Here is an example of what to do . Here is another example. Attribution is required under the terms of our license. — Diannaa (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Diannaa: Okay, thank you M.k.m2003 (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mosques in Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Centre of Muslims[edit]

As-Salam O Alaikum! Brother,

I recently created Wikiproject Centre of Muslims. It is created to improve the articles about places with more than 80% of Muslim Population. After sometime the percentage could be reduced to 50% (places with majority Muslim Population). Similar wikiprojects are working like in the case of [Australia], The only difference is that their scope is countrywide and scope of this Wikiproject is larger, i.e Muslim World.

It was put on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Centre of Muslims because of solo participant. Someone also asked that "Would Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam be interested in this project as a Geography task force?" and I think that Centre of Muslims project should be merged with Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam's Geography task force. Can you please guide me regarding this?

Thank You in anticipation! --Muhammadahmad79 (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, M.k.m2003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Old Bazaar of Kermanshah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Zoroastrianism[edit]

Template:Zoroastrianism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Uanfala (talk) 15:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kashmar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PSC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Safavid castles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/M.k.m2003. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 02:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply