Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kwon Yuri, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sni56996 (talk) 04:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kim Shin-Young (comedian), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mamonde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

promotional article, with non-reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lonedirewolf. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Kim Shin-Young (comedian)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kim Shin-Young (comedian)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:41, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ThePirates2014Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lonedirewolf. I see that you have made a new article about this comedian instead of fixing up the old one. Is there anything that you want to move from the old draft before it is deleted? Maybe that table or some references? Or are you finished with it? —Anne Delong (talk) 17:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I checked again and I've transferred the contents. - Lonedirewolf 23:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I've deleted the draft. —Anne Delong (talk) 01:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Lonedirewolf 10:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wendy Son is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendy Son until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on [[:List of awards and nominations received by Girl's Day]], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by [[:List of awards and nominations received by Girl's Day|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AmRit GhiMire 'Ranjit' (talk) 13:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• 17th Busan International Film Festival
• 16th Busan International Film Festival
• 15th Busan International Film Festival
• 14th Busan International Film Festival

by --Sunuraju (talk) 03:32, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes? Is this a request? Lonedirewolf 05:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

yes it was request by --Sunuraju (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on the rest in the next few days Lonedirewolf 20:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles are well done, but I would suggest that you browse through MOS:FILM and {{Infobox film}}. For example, plot summaries are not supposed to be cited. They are implicitly cited to the film itself. Also, executive producers are not credited in the infobox. The producer field is only for the film's main producer, which you can usually find credited at Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, or Screen International. Internet-based databases can also be helpful, but I would rely most on professional industry magazines, which have a clear editorial staff and history fact-checking. The IMDB, in particular, is prone to error, and it is not a reliable source. It's a good starting point for research, however. If you asked for it, you could probably get the autopatrolled user right. Just remember to create the talk page along with your article. For film-related articles, you should add WikiProject Film's header to the talk page. If you have any questions or concerns, you can contact me on talk page, or you could post to WikiProject Film's talk page, which is pretty friendly and helpful. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it. I'll keep that in mind.Lonedirewolf 16:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SURNAME

After the initial mention of any name, the person should generally be referred to by surname only, without an honorific prefix such as "Mr", "Mrs", "Miss", or "Ms", or by a pronoun.

I've found in Wendy Son, you don't follow the rule about surname in Wikipedia. I advise you change content in that page according to the rule. And, I remembered I've told you about that. K³₄c l⁴m v₁³c t₀t 09:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stage name. All the Red Velvet members use a stage name or in Wendy's case just her first name. Lonedirewolf 14:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why do you use stage name in a BLP article? And the article you use to prove you're right is not a Wikipedia guideline, it is written by a user. K³₄c l⁴m v₁³c t₀t 14:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read it again WP:SURNAME. Besides, she's only credited by her first name. See also: Mononymous person. Examples: Madonna, Rihanna, Drake Lonedirewolf 15:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if you want to keep your edit, just keep it. But she is not famous enough to be a 'mononymous person'. K³₄c l⁴m v₁³c t₀t 18:19, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does that have to do with anything? A person uses a mononym and is credited as such, hence, the mononym. 'Famous enough'? What kind of argument is this? Is that in the description? Go and review everything I've said. Feel free to read the articles again. Lonedirewolf 18:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Villain and Widow.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SM Town Week Girls' Generation - Märchen Fantasy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM Town Week Girls' Generation - Märchen Fantasy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TerryAlex (talk) 22:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PeriperaLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apink filmography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apink filmography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shinyang-i (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Be Natural cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 02:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:RedVelvet1662.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Random86 (talk) 05:57, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:RedVelvet1662.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Dolce Amore, but we cannot accept original research. Please do not make such ideas on your own, the website/reference has released the Synopsis of the story, so why make one? SS1902 (talk) 23:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOR, WP:FILMPLOT/MOS:PLOT, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:TVCAST. Lonedirewolf 05:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HeneralLuna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. KTo288 (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HeneralLuna.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Girls' Generation performing The Boys on Inikigayo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. KTo288 (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sidus Pictures.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lonedirewoft, I happened to look through Wendy's article earlier and thought that perhaps, you can try to combine the "Early life" and "Personal Life" section together to make it more succinct. I see that you seem to contribute to that article a lot, so just a suggestion. Sincerely.--TerryAlex (talk) 03:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll see what I can do. Lonedirewolf 03:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lonedirewolf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	hope u will still update Red Velvet wiki pages // and also are u going to do Yeri official page ? i would do it but i dont even know how ;d Jarek1101 (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:YouTubeMusicAwardsLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I frequently see you contribute to articles listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture and would very much appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture#Eradication of variety show sections so that a conclusion towards variety show appearances can be made. Thanks. Abdotorg (talk) 19:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MusicBankLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aegon Targaryen. Since you had some involvement with the Aegon Targaryen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your contribution to the Wiki article of Red Flavor, I appreciate it. Markuskrgr (talk) 15:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lonedirewolf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lonedirewolf, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 18:10, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Lonedirewolf 18:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<font face="Trajan Pro">[[User:Lonedirewolf|<font color="07044D">'''Lone'''</font>]][[User talk:Lonedirewolf|<font color="0F7B1B">'''direwolf'''</font>]]</font> : Lonedirewolf

to

<span style="font-family: Trajan Pro;">[[User:Lonedirewolf|<b style="color: #07044D">Lone</b>]][[User talk:Lonedirewolf|<b style="color: #0F7B1B">direwolf</b>]]</span> : Lonedirewolf

—Anomalocaris (talk) 23:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Lonedirewolf 11:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, Perfect Velvet is not cluttered by including another collapsed track listing on it. I've reverted you there, so discuss and stop removing it. Secondly, The Perfect Red Velvet should not have been made by you in the first place because repackages normally should not get their own pages. There is normally not enough content to justify having its own article, and you appear to be one site (Naver) over and over anyway. Citing articles from one source over and over isn't showing wide coverage. This fails WP:NALBUMS on its own, so I have redirected it again. We need independent reliable secondary sources for articles. I understand you created the article and maybe put some work into it. You can still redirect that energy into merging it with Red Velvet or I will formally propose it myself because it should not be its own article. Finally, in your edit to Peek-a-Boo (Red Velvet song) you repeated a sentence and restored unencyclopedic wording. It is not impartial to write "this band has a unique concept". You sound like you're trying to advertise or hype Red Velvet. Great if you're a fan, but that's not what Wikipedia is about. Red Velvet are hardly special enough in the entirety of the music world for having a concept behind their band name to justify this. Read WP:PEACOCK and WP:NPOV. Ss112 00:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Naver site posts articles from different sources. If you clicked the link or read them you can see that. My apologies I should probably have just used those there in the first place. No, I was not 'offended' but you seem to be so my apologies for that as well. That wording was used because the sources from South Korean news sites state so and it was intended to let people know why that particular title and why in the next paragraphs it states SM wants them to 'perfect' that concept which people reading the article wouldn't have an idea about. I'm really concerned about your view of artists 'not being special enough' to not have a valid and important part of their career explained in the article. From the titles of their albums alone, it's obvious. From responses in South Korea and even internationally, it's obvious. I haven't made statements I didn't have a source to back it up which includes its importance in South Korea, if in your views, it isn't important enough outside of it. I would like to understand how that 'isn't special enough' for you? Lastly, I moved it because it will eventually be as more content is added. I'll put it in the talk page.Lonedirewolf 02:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I don't see how I could be offended considering it's not my content that was removed or anything, so that's not the right word. Also, when you reverted just before, you left an edit summary on Perfect Velvet for what I did on The Perfect Red Velvet, which would confuse any reader who was scanning the history because it's not concerning that specific page. So please don't do that. I meant "an extra 2,000 bytes" for the Perfect Velvet article. Also, because you used the word "unique". That is not impartial wording, and you weren't directly quoting. That sounds like someone who likes Red Velvet and wants to write about them in a glowing way. You're allowed to like who you write about on Wikipedia, but we're not a publication advertising the group, we are an encyclopedic that should not be written from a fan's point of a view. That means no "Red Velvet's music is great, they have such a unique and special concept behind their existence". No editoralizing. Ss112 05:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not restore the wording at Peek-a-Boo (Red Velvet song) again. Take it to the talk page, because to continue reverting is WP:Edit warring and you should follow WP:BRD because I am assuming another editor removed your wording for violating WP:PEACOCK. Read that article I linked to. "unique" is directly in that section as a word you should not use. Thank you. Ss112 05:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So what was your indication that I was offended? Also, you didn't exactly take it to the talk page either when you removed the content on The Perfect Red Velvet? Nor opened a discussion to move the page? About Peek-a-Boo, feel free to remove the word, if you insist they'll be seen as my own words, not the whole statement. This also isn't about being a fan. I edit most articles related to K-pop. I just take the wording from the Korean articles. I have opened a discussion on the talk page of the album but you removed it once again.Lonedirewolf 11:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right—I don't need to take it to the talk page, because I'm not the one desiring the change of content. You want the change and you were reverted—therefore, you discuss per WP:BRD. Read the page at the link. Become familiar with it. Restore the same wording once more on "Peek-a-Boo" and you'll be reported to an admin. You are being disruptive by continuing to restore it—even without "unique" we don't need a whole explanation of the group's concept. It is not essential whatsoever. Learn what to do when being reverted and stop being disruptive. Discuss it without restoring the change at the talk page. I haven't removed anything from any talk page. Ss112 12:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content disputes need to be sorted out on the article talk page where WP:CONSENSUS should be sought. Edit warring is a no no. See also WP:DR if you need more help in resolving this or any other disagreements. Thanks. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Find me 40-50 articles (even English sources) related to the release of their albums and promotions that don't mention that and I'll stop. But I can find over a hundred with English and Korean articles that do. Especially when the title itself is related to it.Lonedirewolf 05:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, you should stop because an admin asked you to. Content disputes (when you've been reverted) are sorted out on the talk page. You've now been reverted by two users (including me, but most recently Joshua Zhan) and you refuse to stop. I say stop now or you will most likely be blocked to avoid further disruption. Ss112 06:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Explain to me in the talk page of Peek-a-Boo's article your reasoning for removing it after your last comment about it and no, "Don't care" is not a valid explanation.Lonedirewolf 07:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't intend to remove the link you provided, just your removal of the commented-out message, which is to curb you (or another user) thinking it needs to be there in future. "Don't care" was in response to whatever you said—when you're reverted and just continue on, it really shouldn't matter what you say in summaries because edit summaries don't sort content disputes or anything else out. It wasn't intended to be an explanation. Ss112 07:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC):[reply]

Then there will be no problem with me restoring the link is there? Because I will.Lonedirewolf 07:26, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And you evidently saw I didn't remove it with my subsequent edit. Ss112 07:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good then, so we're done here.Lonedirewolf 08:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Lonedirewolf. It appears that you have resolved your immediate disagreement with Ss112. That's good. However based on some of the above I think it's possible that I was unclear in my earlier message. Edit warring is not permitted on the project in all but very rare cases (i.e. reverting naked vandalism copyright violations and the like). Being right in a content dispute is not one of those exceptions. Persistent edit warring is a specie of disruptive editing and that doesn't generally end well. There are a lot of ways to deal with disagreements on here that are available without causing disruption. Please keep this in mind when you next find yourself in this kind of situation. Thank you for your contributions to the project. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Peek-a-Boo cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 14:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Peek-a-Boo MV screen capture.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯxplicit 05:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EtudeHouselogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 18th Busan International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhutanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a RfC in the talkbox. Bladebuster700 (talk) 02:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When creating articles, please consider how much disambiguation the article needs before creating it. You made Summer Magic (Red Velvet EP), but there is no other EP of this name, and Summer Magic (EP) had already been made as a redirect and was vacant. If you are concerned about having your username first in the edit history, then you can create the article as a draft or in your userspace, then request it be moved at WP:RM/TR or simply ask an admin to move it for you. Ss112 02:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh yes, hello again. Making assumptions as usual. The edit history is of no use to me and redirecting the page even with another editor moving the entire page to it is nothing to me. If it were I wouldn't bother editing redirects or stubs. I made it upon the assumption that it's another album since there were no links to it at the time on the artist's official page. It really just takes a few clicks to move.Lonedirewolf 02:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There, done. If the redirect's not necessary then have it removed.Lonedirewolf 02:58, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ℯxplicit 03:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for moving them! Lonedirewolf 03:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 123.136.106.28 (talk) 04:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure you understand what you're trying to use here when all are sourced, including the korean articles. Did you read these articles? Did you check the content? I did. Did you find anything that contradicts this? I didn't. If you did, then by all means include it here to make it more neutral. There was also nothing wrong with how Changedforbetter initially worded it because that's what you get from the refs used. Lonedirewolf 05:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PrinceSado2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lonedirewolf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Law of the Jungle episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flores Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there is no need to change redirects from "band" to "group" because its really the same (see WP:NOTBROKEN), only at templates (like Template:Red Velvet) the links should be exactly the same as the article names, so you dont need to spend a lot of time "fixing" this links if you dont want to since there is pretty much no benefits in doing so, unless you are using some kind of script that is automatically changing redirects. 15:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

User:Snowflake91 I know thanks, I'm not attempting to, I just do it. Besides, doing it lets me browse other articles and fix what I can with the content and/or add links if they aren't there. Who's been moving the articles by the way? Since boy groups haven't been moved yet + other girl groups.LONEDIREWOLF 15:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dont know, there was a discussion at 4L that all articles should be moved from bands to groups. Snowflake91 (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was there but I think only the groups mentioned there have been moved so far. There's still a lot of girl groups that haven't been moved and all of the bgs. Plus the 'co-ed' groups.LONEDIREWOLF 15:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If that true gaon reveal number of download chart doesnt mean all discography of kpop group has been update? For i know and forum such as onehallyu, gaon just release the download sales of soty from jan to nov. Dora1894 (talk) 22:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if you go by the year-end chart and the data from the months we do have. It doesn't have to be accurate or exact because it's '+'. Meaning "more than". Let's say 'Power Up' has 1.2m. If a song is higher than Power Up on the year-end chart then it is impossible for that song's sales to be lower than 1.2m which we would be adding to a song's confirmed sales.

Just to add, you did bring up Bad Boy's sales and the closest is Flower Road which is 1,800,000. However, we can't use 1.8m because it's not confirmed. What if there's a huge gap? We can't just assume Bad Boy got 1.8m, but the closest released numbers which Bad Boy beat on the year-end chart that was released would mean it is confirmed it's higher than that number.LONEDIREWOLF 04:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lonedirewolf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Perfect Red Velvet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Laneige logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Innisfree logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SuperStar SMTOWN.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have reverted my change even though I have provided a source. You don't provide a reason, but it is likely that you are reverting to hide criticism. If this is true, then I have to tell you that Wikipedia don't just tell about good things, but also tell about bad things to ensure neutrality. See WP:NPOV 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 14:07, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NatureRepubliclogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bernadette Banner, YouTuber.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Winter in 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kwon Eunbi, 2023 KBS Entertainment Awards.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shin Su-won, South Korean director, May 2022.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wendy, SBS Building, April 2023.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jang Jin-young, 2017.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen multiple images posted by you that can't be used freely. If you are going to upload images make sure it has a Creative Commons License otherwise your going against the guidelines for image use on Wikipedia. Copyright is very important on here. You don't need to recklessly upload images you think are fine to use. Be more careful about it otherwise it can get you blocked. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 07:46, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at c:User talk:Lonedirewolf#Uploading screenshots from YouTube because there seems to be some issues with the YouTube screenshots you've been uploading to Commons. Until those issues have been resolved, I'm going to temporarily remove the files from the Wikipedia articles where they're being used. I will re-add them if it turns out that the files are actually OK for Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]