Hello, Littleritual. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Scott Mathews, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Please read my comments on the article's talk page [1] and make any comments there before attempting to make edits to the article. Please read WP:AUTO, WP:COI, and WP:RS. Please do NOT WP:EDITWAR or WP:3RR, as that can get you blocked. I don't believe Scott Mathews is notable per Wikipedia policies, given the current sourcing. But perhaps WP:RS will be found by experienced editors and the article can be rebuilt. I have stubbed it per WP:TNT, because it did not meet WP:42. Above all, remember that Wikipedia operates according to WP:CONSENSUS, and that you do not WP:OWN the article. Enough alphabet soup and policy for you? You have a lot of reading ahead of you. In any case, good luck to you, and please be good. Qworty (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am choosing another record producer's format on wikipedia (at random) to base my new approach and please your demands on all levels once and for all. Please know, I have no problems or complaints with the provided article as it is just meant as an example of a very similar page map as I would have and indeed see on various music producer sites. This is a conservative page compared to many story telling, unsourced and puffery sites I ran across in my thorough search.

Please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Chiccarelli

I will proceed once you get back to me with your solid OK that; - a discography such as this can be listed without sources (I have sources if needed) - there are no sources on the artists claimed to have been produced by this person in the early section yet that is allowed (I have sources if needed) - some sources that are used come from his management company that is directly in charge of his PR - a source used comes from an interview he did with a well known industry website that you pulled from mine siting it was not credited (www.hitquarters.com) is allowed - sources that come directly from allmusic.com (the biggest and most comprehensive web database on recorded music) is 100% allowable - a small story telling tone such as this site has is in keeping with wikipedia style - clarify that other wikipedia sites are allowed to use as sources

I look forward to your usual expeditious timing and getting the green light on this to put the listing up sooner than later. Thank you very kindly.

User talk:Litteritual 13:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• My advice--once again--is for you to read and heed WP:AUTO and stop trying to use Wikipedia as your personal free web hosting service for your admitted autobiography. This is the advice you will hear from any experienced Wikipedia editor. If you want certain things to appear on the Internet, you should use your own website, not Wikipedia. That's not what Wikipedia is for. Also, you do not WP:OWN the article about yourself. You should walk away from it and let others edit it. As for the other article you mention, that is nothing more than WP:OTHERCRAP. If you are interested in editing Wikipedia, please find other articles to work on, those not associated with yourself. Thank you. Qworty (talk) 04:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scott Mathews, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Wesley Harding and Closer to the Flame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]