Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lichengolist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lichengolist, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As i see the article was already created just yesterday https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lichenologist I guess it was thanks to the draft. --LeonardoSmi (talk) 09:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeonardoSmi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LeonardoSmi -- Thanks for submitting this article. I've corrected some details; see the edit summaries. It doesn't seem to be gold open access for example. I'm also concerned that the Q1 ranking is unlikely to be true for a journal with an impact factor below 1; on a quick scan this doesn't seem to be in the sources you cite and I wonder if it is a cut-and-paste error? Please check and supply a working source for it. You might like to add the selective indexing services that the journal appears in, as this is the main way that the journals project assess notability. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 03:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you. You are right in questioning Q1, it is Q3, sorry my mistake I forgot to change it. Nevertheless, I think it is gold open access: https://www.elsevier.com/journals/annales-de-paleontologie/0753-3969/open-access-options --LeonardoSmi (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the indexing. From our article gold open access requires all content to be open, which isn't the case here. I think it might be best classed as a hybrid open-access journal, though these days that's really the norm to the extent of being hardly worth stating. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. I removed GOA, think it isn't necessary to mention it.LeonardoSmi (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your efforts in improving articles on academic journals, we can always use more editors in this area. Tips on how to create good articles can be found in our journal article writing guide. Also, I see that you're adding "h" values and SCImago rankings to articles. This is stuff that we usually leave out. There are many ranking services (the best know GScholar, Scopus, Journal Citation Report, but there are more) and many different metrics (the Journal Citation Reports alone have 5 or 6) and it is impossible to keep all of that updated in thousands of journal articles. In practice, like it or not (I don't), the only metric that journal authors and readers are interested in is the Clarivate impact factor, so that's the only metric that we list. As you'll see when going through journal articles, you'll see that even this single metric is often not up to date (and soon the 2021 IFs will be released). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randykitty (talk • contribs) 14:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thx.LeonardoSmi (talk) 10:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 17:52, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've accepted this. If you have articles on journals from reputable publishers, with selective indexing and impact factors, moved to draftspace, I suggest you contact WP:Academic Journals for assistance. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 00:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Internal Medicine Journal, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 01:33, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks, I tried to use just basic minimum but I will be more careful in future.LeonardoSmi (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Journal of Food Protection, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bruxton (talk) 17:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links are dead, this will give you time to get the article ready. Sources do exist - your first two are dead links. Follow the style of MOS:CITE for reference format. Bruxton (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks, I can check it.--LeonardoSmi (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the links and accepted this; see above note re WP:Academic journals who might be able to help out if this happens in future. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it was done by mistake, I created redirect, cannot move it as new article is already created. If I should do something else and ask for deleteion somewhere, please write me, from the above link I m not sure what should I do.LeonardoSmi (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Perhaps the above cut-and--paste move was a mistake, but you did it again here: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. I just had to put in a lot of effort to repair the damage. Please do not do this again. --Randykitty (talk) 16:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am really sorry, at first I didn't know about this function and so I just checked the message, but didn't realize it in my future edit. Now I will be aware of it. Thank you for repair.LeonardoSmi (talk) 17:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeonardoSmi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lichengolist, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeonardoSmi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lichengolist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeonardoSmi

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username IceBergYYC, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Preprints.org, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|IceBergYYC}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

IceBergYYC (talk) 07:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've edited and created some preprint articles and think this is a big preprint server. In my POV, it is similar to the case with journals. You have sources such as databases, and it's ok.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Resources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MedRxiv

Research Square https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_preprint_repositories

LeonardoSmi (talk) 09:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_Square See Research Square, which I also created, has an advertising tag. So I tried to improve both. The problem is that for preprints and journals you need primary sources (databases).LeonardoSmi (talk) 10:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]