Hello, Leafs-fall-around-me, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 14:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jordan Ju, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Please don't turn years into two-digit abbreviations. Drmies (talk) 03:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know why you thought this was a good idea, an edit to be made in hundreds of articles. Many of your edits are already of doubtful benefit (like adding "TBD" for things that haven't happened yet), but all this is really just not good. Please see MOS:DATERANGE for guidance. For instance, 2012-14 is acceptable, though 2012-2014 is preferred, but 12-14 is not acceptable. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. You are doing it again. Drmies (talk) 03:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Unbelievable. I have to go through your edits again and revert them--edits that violate the MOS, for which you have gotten no fiat; you didn't even explain in an edit summary what you are doing. Next time. Final warning: next time I will report you for disruption, in this case a combination of MOS violations, no consensus for your edits, and a lack of communication. Drmies (talk) 03:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had not seen your messages when I made the most recent edits. And you're actually deleting relevant information in the case of Lauri Bonacorsi, as she is no longer competing with that partner. I had added the results from their partnership. It was entirely unnecessary to be so rude when I was only trying to make a more uniform aesthetic that follows what I see on other athlete's articles and determine their continuation of the sport. But I will be more vigilant in future.Leafs-fall-around-me (talk) 03:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I was not being rude; editing in the same pattern when those edits were reverted for good reason is disruptive. The merits of edits that you perceive as aesthetically beneficial are yet to be determined, and if they're against the MOS those merits are questionable. Your edit on Lauri Bonacorsi contained no edit summary whatsoever, and it included the things I have already tagged as problematic. That there's other material in the same edit that might be beneficial is sad, but it cannot be avoided and only emphasizes the problem. Your job, it seems to me, is to get a consensus for the problematic edits. Drmies (talk) 18:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not update the NHL teams statistics in the middle of the week, because they are updated once a week. Frequent updates to the statistics cause errors and unneeded edit wars. In addition, do not alter the references for no apparent reason. And lastly, disclose any other account under which you have previously edited, because your edits imply that you are evading your block. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I wasn’t aware they were updated weekly. And I haven’t used any other account to previously edit. Leafs-fall-around-me (talk) 11:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You have a great many of what I classify as Footnotes, rather than actual references or citations.

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

You have worked hard, but have not shown that this cup has notability in a Wikipedia sense.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tallink Hotels Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tallink Hotels Cup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 14:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leafs-fall-around-me! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 14:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have added "to be determined" to various skating competitions on several articles, though none of your edits are sourced. Is this some personal knowledge you have about the competition, and each skaters commitment to participate? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The entries for the competition were released today, yes. https://scboston.org/cranberry-competitors/ Leafs-fall-around-me (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please add that source to the articles? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leafs-fall-around-me. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tallink Hotels Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]