Welcome!

Hello, Latreia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  19:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I've replied to your posting at Talk:New Apostolic Reformation#Merging article into Global Harvest Ministries, and I'd be glad for any help you can give in improving the article. Thanks, OttoTheFish (talk) 08:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for commenting at Right Sector: Recent changes. A formal RfC on the question has just started. (“Should we say in the lead say that group members are neofascist?”) --Dervorguilla (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Latreia for correcting my edit on Right Sector. Not sure where I got that info, given the cite I used. -Darouet (talk) 19:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Those guys' importance is really overrated. Latreia (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to polls they have little support, and this would be consistent with published academic literature on far-right politics in Ukraine, which state that extremism is less of a problem there than in neighboring countries. My fear is that, with the threat of war or with people getting killed, populations on all sides become radicalized. -Darouet (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillsong Church Kiev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillsong Church Kiev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hillsong Church Kiev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.facebook.com/pages/Hillsong-Church-Kiev/112512478766244. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 03:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article was undeleted as there was NO copyright infringement. You have not done WP:BEFORE (by looking at the history of the article and seeing that its text came about gradually over time) and should have read criteria for speedy deletion up to the section (WP:NOTCSD) where there is one #10:

If content appears both here and somewhere else (possibly in modified form), consider the possibility that Wikipedia's is the original version and the other site copied from us.

What a novel idea that after more a decade of Wikipedia's existence, some people on Facebook (seeing as the Facebook page is clearly marked as an _unofficial_ page; thus either created by some random fans, or a "community page" which fetches content from Wikipedia automatically) could have copied Wikipedia. —Latreia (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Latreia. You have new messages at Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.
Message added 06:11, 22 November 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Winged Blades ^Godric 06:11, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Latreia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Suman Sen 303. And, they're likely back:) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 16:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: I see that the new sock has already been blocked. Back then, I tried to put their/his self-promotion up for speedy deletion, but it was rejected, which I frankly didn't understand—new book, draft edited only by socks of the author.... Latreia (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed you are fluent in both Russian and English and was hoping you would join the Soviet Aviation Task Force and translate some of our missing articles into English. Many of the articles on the list are Heroes of the Soviet Union that have articles in many languages except English, and others on the list are major plane crashes that have yet to be articles on English Wiki. We also have many stubs that can easily be expanded through translation from Russian. I really hope you can join our task force and assist in translating. We really need some native Russian speakers at our task force, and you seem like a great candidate. Thank you, --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Latreia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]