You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. From the comments it is clear that you are the same person that has reverting the removal of the frontpage.com opinion piece from various IP addresses. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for 48 hours for the combination of your violation of 3RR on Kwanzaa, combined with your anonymous editing from multiple IP addresses. Nandesuka 20:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's wrong to presume that Karenga is me or that I am he. I made some of the anon-ip edits that you blocked him for at Kwanzaa. 70.85.195.229 04:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even if I believed you were not sockpuppets of each other — and, let's be honest, you are — you are both revert warring, and you are both blocked. Nandesuka 07:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to assume bad faith. We are not the same, as you might have noticed User 70:.... was able to continue editing. 17:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

This is a false accusation. Nandesuka, you might consider asking or doing a checkuser before blocking. star 23:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Assume Good Faith" doesn't require us to be willfully stupid. If you engage in such behavior again, the next block will be longer. Arguably, your editing the article in the disruptive manner you have chosen, combined with the username you have chosen is grounds for an indefinite block under Wikipedia:Username. Regards, Nandesuka 23:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]