Hi Jwegryn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 18:42, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

After I have added much of the content for List of fictional dogs at several of its redirected links (such as dogs in comics), it seems to me that the host page could be cleaned up further. Although most of the subcomponents have been redirected to their own page, three other remain: Songs; Sports and Advertising; and Other fictional dogs. Those should be moved to their own page, leaving the host page with only the redirected links. Thus the Table of Contents box could be removed as it would be redundant.

This whole wiki editing to me is overwhelming... even though I have looked at the tutorials. So, if it is agreed that this change would be worthwhile, and since I am unwilling to do this myself for lack of confidence that I would do it correctly, would anybody else care to make the change? Jwegryn (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to List of fictional dogs has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Adding to the list is okay, but copying the copyright descriptive prose from another website is not. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:11, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KoshVorlon. An edit that you recently made to List of fictional dogs seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KoshVorlon 15:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the List of fictional dogs article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Tito Dutta (talk) 16:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of fictional dogs in comics page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Dogs in television animation, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of Dogs in television animation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:List of Dogs in television animation during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 08:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the Draft page is just unedited for 6 months. Comment here. [1] if you still want the Draft. Legacypac (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Name. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 17:52, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is that it a) appears to be a blog, and b) appears to be YOUR blog (hence you need to stop adding links to it). General Ization ^Talk 20:10, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New England Small College Athletic Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinton, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit to Penny press last April, you copied content from somewhere on Wikipedia but did not copy over the references cited. Which article did you get the content from? Schazjmd (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found it. To copy from one article to another, you must copy the source wikitext (not from the view displayed to readers) in order to retain formatting and references properly. Also, you must attribute the source of the content in your edit summary. You can learn more about that at WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Schazjmd (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Baptist colleges and universities in the United States, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Elizabeth Lail, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. All bio info at a WP:BLP must be sourced to a reliable source. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are dozens of reliable sources for Lail's birth date. Also, Wikipedia does typically give a source for other celebrities birth date, such as Nicole Kidman's. You call for a source is utterly unreasonable. Jwegryn (talk) 18:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, they aren't "reliable". That's the point. Kidman's DOB is sourced to Los Angeles Times and Entertainment Weekly which are reliable soruces. A "Google search" is not a "reliable source". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say Google was a reliable source. But it certainly lists several, including IMDb and TMDB. What makes Lindsay Weinberg a reliable source for Lail? Rather than reject my entry, why not seek a reliable source on your own and make that page worth looking up? Jwegryn (talk) 13:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reference (2) given for birth date on Elizabeth Lail page makes no mention of her birth date, so is an invalid reference. Jwegryn (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]