Welcome!

Hello, JukoFF, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  - Darwinek 18:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article USA war crimes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Binksternet (talk) 17:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated USA war crimes, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USA war crimes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I fixed the discussion for you. You didn't format it right. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regrettably I much bad dialect on english. JukoFF

• Hi JukoFF, you may want to make your points on the AfD discussion where they are most likely to be seen and included in the discussion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USA war crimes --Deadly∀ssassin 21:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you have changed the national coach for Timor Leste, can you provide me with a source to say they changed coach?

Thanks, Adam

Druryfire (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are mistaken, I have only added inwika - ru. The trainer was changed by the previous participant. JukoFF (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P/S http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/27457471/ JukoFF (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Moscow Victory Parade of 1945, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Moscow Victory Parade of 1945 has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Moscow Victory Parade of 1945, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Думаю, вы были не совсем правы, проставляя такую интервику - тема статьи шире, чем просто свадебное платье. К тому же в русской статье стоит ссылка на другую страницу из энвики, посему с вашего позволения убираю. Best regards, =p.s.a.= 17:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Согласен поспешил. JukoFF (talk) 22:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for uploading the file. Could you check the book and see if the original photographer is listed anywhere? Cheers, Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FLC} 11:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok JukoFF (talk) 19:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch. Do you have a source that A.A. Artis died 70 years ago? Or when he died? Else the license need to be changed. Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FLC} 07:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Privet. Как дела? :-)--Soul Train (talk) 07:51, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Дела принципи не плохо, как твои?. JukoFF (talk) 08:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Свалил с ру-вики. Достала она. Вронг Мен теперь подводящий итоги, офигеть. Зато есть больше времени на свой сайт, и на другие дела.--Soul Train (talk) 10:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not Mylène Farmer on the photo you insert. It's a spitting image of the singer. Moreover, Mylène Farmer never sang in a little theater, and she wore this dress only in Stadiums.

Three and a half years after you pointed it out, someone has got round to correcting the error! SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 22:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 World Championships in Athletics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aleksandr Ivanov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Пpивeтствyю. Я вeрнo пoнимаю пyнкт Coзданнaя cтaтья дoлжнa быть включeнa в тaблицу в тeчeние 24 чacoв c мoмента написания, но не позже сроков окончания Марафона., что статья, написанная в рамках марафона, но занесённая в список много позже, не участвует? Siver-Snom (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

принципи верно, гдавное чтобы не после 16 марта

, ос альное в большей степени пожелание. А что вы обнаружили прицидннт?

He, ну ecли пoжелание. Siver-Snom (talk) 16:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding stolen images to Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Although the site you sourced the images from is published under a Creative Commons licence, the images in question are not subject to that licence as they originally came from Getty Images, and thus are subject to the copyright they were originally uploaded under. – PeeJay 17:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong image uploaded under a free license with the government of Brazil site, and the fact that at Getty Images indicated, it is not a fact now I understand this question. Temporarily stopping the download. JukoFF (talk) 18:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kate Grigorieva, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian and Vogue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FC Rostov logo2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JukoFF. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JukoFF. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've run across several drafts created by brand new users that you've moved to mainspace, despite them not being ready. Would you please consider tagging them with {{subst:submit}} instead so that they can be reviewed through the WP:AFC process? Bradv 20:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am an administrator in Russian Wikipedia. These articles are created within the framework of my edithoton. I am sure of the sources and significance of the topic. JukoFF (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know that different languages have different standards for inclusion, so you may not be familiar with the English Wikipedia's policies. Articles like this simply do not meet our criteria for inclusion without a lot more references. Please reconsider. Bradv 20:48, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a rule, I add at least three references to the source in each article I finalized. However, with a distinguished article, you are right. I will supplement it with sources. Thank you for mentioning. JukoFF (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate the work you are doing in improving some of these rough drafts. I patrol both drafts and new pages, so I see most of them either way. But there is a whole team of people at WP:AFC who are happy to help too. Bradv 20:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paramonov’s Mill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bishop House (Taganrog), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:12, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know :) JukoFF (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JukoFF. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NessieVL. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Salmon louse have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You asked about the source of the list of most visited art museums. I used the print edition of the April 2020 issue of the Art Newspaper, which I bought in a bookstore. I believe the full list is also available on-line with a subscription to the Art Newspaper Digital version. Good idea to do a Russian version, though I'm afraid all museum lists will be very sad this year, thanks to the virus. Cordially SiefkinDR (talk) 15:46, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to answer your other question. The list has seventy-seven museums because it listed only those with over a million visitors. SiefkinDR (talk) 15:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• SiefkinDR Thank you very much for your answer. 77 museums is also a good number) And here about attendance you're right, museums are not the best of times :((

Thank you again) JukoFF (talk) 15:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Thank you very much for participating in The 2020 Months of African Cinema Global Contest which was concluded on 30 November 2020. The contest was able exceed all expectations, with the creation of over 3,200 articles written in 19 languages. This places the contest firmly as one of the most successful article writing contest on Wikipedia.

A big thank you to you and every single person who created articles during the period of the contest for making this happen!

Please note that we have now concluded the review of all submitted articles, and winners have now been listed on the relevant page. We'd still be contacting everyone who has won something separately to send over their prizes. Thank you very much once again! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:45, 03 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The AfroCine Project Appreciates You!
	Thank you for your contributions during the 2020 Months of African Cinema Global Contest. --Jamie Tubers (talk) 01:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nika (short story), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your two image additions, because in my opinion nothing of value is added to the article by the inclusion. For both articles, I suggest that you start a discussion on the Talk page to justify and get a consensus before adding the images again. David notMD (talk) 22:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course! JukoFF (talk) 22:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will be away from computer access through 5 July. David notMD (talk) 22:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then we'll continue the discussion when you come back:) I really would be very interested to understand your point of view regarding the illustrations in the two articles above. I sincerely, not for the sake of argument, think they are quite appropriate. JukoFF (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The decision reached at Talk:Vitamin B12 was to not use the image you proposed. David notMD (talk) 15:14, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well. Then you were right:) JukoFF (talk) 15:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JukoFF. Thank you for creating Rostovsocbank. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Valery Kaufman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valery Kaufman. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valery Kaufman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valery Kaufman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 ‑ Iridescent 03:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]