Hi JAGrace (BYU)! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Mere Mete Whaanga at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:37, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great article! Can I interest you in Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Helen Foster Snow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that in this edit to Belle S. Spafford, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 01:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello @Adam9007: I apologize for not explaining in detail my reasoning behind deleting the list of publications on the Belle S. Spafford page. Currently, this page is under review for Good Article status. The reviewer does not believe that the list of publications establishes notability for Spafford, and is ultimately unnecessary. Therefore, I deleted the list in order to move forward with the review. (The exchanges can be read here on the talk page.) But I should have explained my actions more thoroughly. Once again, my apologies. Unless I hear back from you otherwise, I will remove the extensive list of articles from Spafford's page with a proper explanation in the edit summary. Thanks for your diligence. JAGrace (BYU) (talk) 02:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	Congratulations, it's a...
	...Wikipedia Good Article!! Shearonink (talk) 05:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 12:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Tonga you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HaEr48 -- HaEr48 (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Tonga you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Tonga for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HaEr48 -- HaEr48 (talk) 05:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @HaEr48: Thank you for the review. I will begin working on the necessary changes and will follow up with you soon to complete the review. JAGrace (BYU) (talk) 21:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• @HaEr48: I am still working on editing the article according to your recommendations. However, I believe that I will need more time to do a thorough job. Would you be willing to extend the review's hold? I believe that I can complete the changes by the end of next week. Thank you for your consideration. JAGrace (BYU) (talk) 21:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes I will keep it on hold. Don't worry, I understand you're still working on it. There's nothing that says I must close the hold iwthin certain amount of days. HaEr48 (talk) 21:56, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

• The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 18:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Tonga you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Tonga for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HaEr48 -- HaEr48 (talk) 20:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of International Harp Archive at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew D. (talk) 19:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Helen Foster Snow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Power~enwiki -- Power~enwiki (talk) 22:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Helen Foster Snow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Helen Foster Snow for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Power~enwiki -- Power~enwiki (talk) 03:21, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Stand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sundance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]