Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Desi Beats Private Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how i add Referance ? Infoprovider434 (talk) 07:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infoprovider434! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help Me To Create Artical Infoprovider434 (talk) 07:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Desi Beats Private Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not a business directory.

Qcne (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Infoprovider434. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Infoprovider434. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Infoprovider434|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Infoprovider434, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Infoprovider434|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 10:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You claim that you took this image so you clearly have a connection. This must be disclosed. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not a finaical stake On promoting this topic Infoprovider434 (talk) 10:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know these musicians that you took a picture of? 331dot (talk) 10:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Listen His song You can Search on Google Shubham Rangra It's a Indian Singer Songwriter And When They Come in A Concert I Click The Picture Infoprovider434 (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case you must immediately request deletion of the image, as you do not possess the copyright, or you have not demonstrated that the image was released with a copyright compatible with Wikipedia(allowing for reuse for any purpose with attribution). 331dot (talk) 10:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this image Has Two Persons First Onee Is Shubham Rangra And Second Is Me Infoprovider434 (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you do not work for Desi Beats Private Limited? 331dot (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Work For Desi Beats Private Limited Infoprovider434 (talk) 10:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you must declare as a paid editor. This is a Terms of Use requirement, and you will be blocked if you fail to do this soon. Please follow the instructions in my initial message above. That you were not entirely honest about this does not look good for you.

If you are in the image, then you didn't take it and can't claim it as your personal work. They copyright belongs to the photographer. 331dot (talk) 10:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh The Copyright Belongs to the photographer Because they Click the photo? Infoprovider434 (talk) 11:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. The photographer may upload the image as their own work, but you can't. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So Now But I Do ? Infoprovider434 (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The easiest thing to do is for you to request deletion of the image from Commons and have the photographer upload it as their work.

You will also need to declare as a paid editor very soon. 331dot (talk) 13:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I Upload My own Click Image So ?

And I Am Not A Paid Editor Sir You Can Delete The Image But I Am Not A Paid Editor Infoprovider434 (talk) 13:47, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you could also upload an image you took yourself.

You said that you work for Desi Beats. Do you do this for free? 331dot (talk) 13:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do This for free Infoprovider434 (talk) 13:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, then you need to declare a conflict of interest; please see WP:COI for instructions. 331dot (talk) 15:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Now I Understand Everything so can I Create A Article Of Shubham Rangra? Infoprovider434 (talk) 16:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Though it is inadvisable, it is permitted as long as you declare a conflict of interest and use the draft submission process. 331dot (talk) 17:27, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Infoprovider434,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shubham Rangra for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Maliner (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you delete my Artical Infoprovider434 (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Himachal Pradesh University, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DreamRimmer (talk) 07:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which Type Of Source I Provide Please Tell me Infoprovider434 (talk) 07:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Sardar Patel University. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DreamRimmer (talk) 07:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Sardar Patel University. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DreamRimmer (talk) 07:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]