Welcome!

Hello, JustToClarify, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JustToClarify. You have new messages at Talk:Medium (TV series).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bbb23 (talk) 17:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I hope you at least recognize that there is an issue with sortable tables, endashes, and Safari 4. I consider this a usability/compatability issue for this browser, and think some fix should be done. There are a few possible fixes (some, but not all, were written up here). A number of the fixes that solve the problem and retain sorting are quite simple in my opinion (including the "to" fix), but I also think you can surmise, from the subsequent edits at Hewitt, why you don't see them in many articles. Note that the claim that the "to" fix violates MOS is being discussed at WT:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Clarification_needed_on_WP:DATESNO. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for causing you a bit of trouble there. Didn't mean to. ℥^nding·start 18:11, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you made good edits, the parts people didn't like should have been edited out, instead of having the whole edit undone.--JustToClarify (talk) 17:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I came here about this article, to find you complaining about "the whole edit undone". Likewise. Had you asked, I would have pointed out that nearly all the content about "soundtracks" is sourced to imdb, and it's essentially a timeline list with little prose. It seriously needed some rewriting. Mentioning some soundtrack work with films in which she acted makes connections that are otherwise lost. Gimmetoo (talk) 02:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Why do you keep changing the filmography table so that the sorting doesn't work right for some browsers? Gimmetoo (talk) 13:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I feel as though the amount of (likely outdated) browsers and users that this would affect is negligible, and it wouldn't be worth changing the right layout of the table to account for a small number of users. This discussion took place a few months back and the conclusion was that the tables should be left as they are. I know it probably looks like I'm changing your edits just to annoy you, but I do genuinely feel that the tables should be left as they are. --JustToClarify (talk) 15:38, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see no discussion on the talk page of that article, nor anything that determines the "right" format. The format you keep restoring has functionality problems. I don't care whether "sorting' is there or not, but if it is there, and simple fixes are available to make it work, then use one. Gimmetoo (talk) 16:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Client List (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Risqué (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]