You posted some time ago in the Penetron talk page that it "sounds like an ad". Can you clarify? I though the advantages and disadvantages were well illustrated? Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the article was completely rewriten about a month after I made that statement on the discussion page. The article still lacks proper citations and needs some other clean up especially on the discussion page :p IRMacGuyver (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhh, I didn't bother to check the History and match the dates :-) Please jump back in if you have a chance, I'd like to clean it up. A few more refs have appeared in Google Books so the timing seems right. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re-adding the PROD tag to the article. To quote from WP:PROD: "If any person objects to the deletion (usually by removing the {{proposed deletion}} tag), the proposal is aborted and may not be re-proposed." If you still desire deletion of the article, list it for WP:AFD. Nsk92 (talk) 05:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well if it would get deleted then I wouldn't have to keep adding it. No one is discussing the deletion like they're supposed to. It's obvious they created the page themselves which is against wikipedia rules. IRMacGuyver (talk) 07:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Volcanic winter of 536, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It did and thus needed to be added. IRMacGuyver (talk) 07:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Volcanic winter of 536. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]