Hello, Hasdi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Noah Ringer at KCA.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've added a section to the talk page in regards to this if you want to add your view, I hope I represented your position correctly.Number36 (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also taking one of those cookies while I'm here.Number36 (talk) 20:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I need help. Grey's wiki photo that was just uploaded seems to have vanished already. You were the next person to edit. Did I do anything wrong? I spent a lot of time making sure that pic would stay and hopefully it comes back. Haverhillanthony (talk) 21:20, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're fine I think. It's just that you uploaded the picture with an extra dot in the file name, and another editor removed that extra dot thinking it was typo. I undid the changes so she is back in all her glory. Oh, I just saw Grey's note on releasing the photo under CC-BY-SA-3.0 on her facebook. I'm going to put that cite so it will stick. Bow to the Queen!!! :-) — Hasdi Bravo • 21:27, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't re-add the term 'full Ginsburg' to describe Ambassador Rice. Firstly, the term is not used in any of the sources, so adding it would violate the prohibition against OR/Synthesis. Secondly, even if it were used in a source, it shouldn't be used to describe a living person. Please look at Wikipedia:Words to avoid and WP:BLP for our policies against using loaded words to describe living persons. FurrySings (talk) 15:00, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Did you miss this? — Hasdi Bravo • 15:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/16/tv-soundoff-sunday-talkin_n_1887973.html[reply]
  • If you have an issue with the loaded word, take out Rice's entry under "Full Ginsburg" page first. I don't know why you find that term offensive to any living person. — Hasdi Bravo • 15:09, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'this' is a blog entry and not a reliable source. FurrySings (talk) 12:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hasdi. You have new messages at Talk:Attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi.
Message added 14:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Can you comment on this? FutureTrillionaire (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited After Earth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happy Birthday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited After Earth, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Variety and David S. Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited After Earth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Del Rey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AV Club is a satirical website.—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't. See The A.V. Club. — Hasdi Bravo • 14:36, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The A.V. Club is an entertainment newspaper and website published by The Onion. It features reviews of new films, music, television, books, games and DVDs, as well as interviews and other regular offerings examining both new and classic media and other elements of pop culture. Unlike its parent publication, The A.V. Club is not satirical, though much of its content maintains a similarly humorous tone.

The statement regarding all Japanese actors turning down the role of Shredder because of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles being sacred in the Shinto religion is complete bullshit though. That would be the "similarly humorous tone" you cite there. It should not be used as a reliable source, even though it does provide reviews and the like. Perhaps you should take its news section to be half satire and half truth.—Ryulong (琉竜) 03:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The A.V. Club doesn't do satire like The Onion. Sarcasm yes but not satire. It may not be total bullshit either. Bay is clearly going for the demonic Shredder that is only portrayed in the fifth season of the 2003 series. My speculation is that the backstory may involve a Japanese man named Oroku Saki during fuedal Japan making a pact with a demon, which in the modern-day New York City manifest itself in a form of a white man named Colonel Schrader. :-/ We have to wait and see if Fitchner will actually be yellowfaced to portray Oroku Saki or not. Still sucks tho. If you want to talk more, I suggest we continue at Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014 film). Later. — Hasdi Bravo • 05:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but

"Having apparently determined that no Japanese actors would dare be a part of the Jonathan Liebesman-directed Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, presumably given the original text’s importance to the Shinto religion, producer Michael Bay has been forced to make a decision regarding the reboot of a nostalgia property that will potentially upset people, just this one time."

does not read as sincere reporting to me. This insinuates that the original TMNT comic is somehow revered by followers of Shinto. The A.V. Club is the only source reporting on this "fact" which means it's probably total bullshit and part of the "humorous tone" that it is known for. Do not treat that website's humor as fact. Now, this is following WP:BRD. You made a bold edit to add the claim. I reverted it. Now we discuss it (as we are doing here) instead of edit warring over a dubiously sourced sentence. Rather than discussing it on the talk page, I will question the validity of the source at WP:RSN shortly.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the discussion or guidelines about including notable persons in the critical response section? There's no discussion about including Obama's response on Life of Pi, which you use for an example. Obama's response to Life of Pi isn't relevant to critical response no more than Buzz Aldrin's is to After Earth.--Relyk (talk) 02:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the discussion or guidelines of removing notable persons in the critical response section? Are you suggesting we should remove Obama's and Anne Hathaway's review from Life of Pi (film) too? At least Buzz Aldrin's review of After Earth was heavily covered in the news. We have to stick it somewhere if not under Critical response section. — Hasdi Bravo • 03:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hasdi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hasdi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]