Dear Admin, thanks for your message. I am a technology enthusiast who is extremely interested in AI, AR/VR, Blockchain etc. I believe those technology will fundamentally change our life in the near future. Currently only Internet company has its own wiki page such as Google, Baidu etc. But blockchain related foundation deserves its due attention too. In addition, I have no relationship with the exchange mentioned in my article i.e. I am not employed by them. I am just doing some research about decentralized exchange and this one catches my attention. Of course in the future I will continue the work to add more articles about decentralized exchange as general and introduce some good ones to the public. I believe that current financial system deserves disruptive innovation to improve the well-being and convenience of all the human. If I used inappropriate words in my article, I can modify to make it more neutral. Thanks.

I have no doubt that you are acting in perfectly good faith, but unfortunately you have evidently not understood the reason for the block. You are blocked because your editing was promotional, and you have asked to be unblocked so that you can edit to give publicity to a subject which you think "deserves" more attention, and to provide "disruptive innovation" for a system which "deserves" such disruption. Wikipedia does not permit editing for the purpose of publicising or promoting anything, whether the motivation for doing is financial, a personal belief that the subject is noble and "deserves" to be better known, or anything else. You are unlikely to be unblocked unless you convince an administrator that you understand that, and will not continue to edit in order to gain attention for subjects you believe in. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Admin, thank you so much for your prompt reply and the detailed reasons. I see your points now. Sorry this is my first time to publish an article on Wikipedia and in the past I only publised on other medium where there was no rule on the content. I shouldn't have ignored the fact that on Wikipedia the article and argument should be neutral i.e. without subject bias and personal emotion, and it cannot be promotional. The article should be well-supported by a great number of independent resources. And the article should be a good introductory resources for beginners who want to understand a new topic but the article itself should not be misleading i.e. being too positive or too negative on the subject. We as an author should only state facts. The audience should make the judgement instead of the author. I will keep those rules in mind when I make my contribution to wikipedia community. Thanks!

I have accepted your request. Please note that any promotional editing will result in a reblock. As always with any editor, if you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]