Hello, GameEnd, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Super Bowl LIII, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I noticed that in this edit to Bobby Farrell, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheEpTic (talk) 13:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Opps, sorry GameEnd (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

.. to pursue a career on Wikipedia of reverting vandalism, as you were clearly trying to do here [1] recently, then you may wish to investigate using more powerful tools than undoing edits one at a time. Start with WP:POP, and then look into WP:TWINKLE or WP:AVT. There are yet more powerful tools, but they require WP:ROLLBACK authority and I would strongly advise building up some experience and a good track record before you apply for that. Best wishes. Philip Trueman (talk) 17:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I too wish to thank you for your vandalism work, but urge you to look closely when doing so. Please refer to the history at Lakeshore High School. No worries...it happens. Thanks for becoming a Wikipedian! John from Idegon (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John: I think you are being a little unfair on a newbie. GameEnd: In case it isn't clear, your undo was valid; the problem is that the previous edit also needed to be undone, which John has now done. Get to grips with Popups, pick up some more experience, and you will soon take cases like this in your stride. Philip Trueman (talk) 10:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Fair warning: vandal fighting can be very addictive. Thanks for your recent work on keeping Wikipedia clean. Ifnord (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 16:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK GameEnd (talk) 17:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Welcome, and thanks for your work so far. You seem to have a feel for what you're doing, but feel free to reach out to me on my talk if you're ever unsure about how to approach a situation. Cheers! GirthSummit (blether) 21:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Rosarian Academy: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok GameEnd (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In the future, please be sure you understand WP:OWNTALK. Editors (including IPs) can remove warnings from their own talk pages. Also, DynamicIP templates can also be removed; do not re-instate them per WP:UP#CMT. While editors can always revert vandalism, be sure that you don't mistake unexplained blanking for vandalism when the blanking is specifically allowed. You can be censured/blocked per WP:EW for repeatedly reverting anything that is not clearly vandalism, and I'd hate to see you get into trouble over that sort of nonsense. Thank you for your countervandalism efforts. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for trying to deal with vandalism. However, you only reverted one out of the three vandalism edits at Women-only passenger car. Please use the proper manual revert procedure, or, as you have been told several times on this page, use an anti-vandalism tool. Your inaction on your talk page messages is getting tiresome; if it continues, you may be blocked, because your efforts at reverting vandalism are sometimes doing more harm than good. Graham87 07:34, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that revert. Żyrafał (talk) 12:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it's okay GameEnd (talk) 12:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey FYI, that Ip can delete whatever message they want on their page as long as it isn't refactoring a comment of someone elses mid conversation. They don't have to archive warnings at all. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry GameEnd (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No biggie, just didn't want to see anyone get worked up for nothing ;) Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok GameEnd (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may discuss this article at its talk page. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to use explanatory edit summaries (not just “revert”)), especially when reverting other editors. --2604:2000:E010:1100:3020:B13F:3E13:123B (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Generation Z, you may be blocked from editing. Paleontologist99 (talk) 19:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi as someone who played the game, I wanted to explain why I reverted one of your edits to Lego Star Wars: The Complete Saga. The reason why I undid your latest contribution to the article was because there is no dialogue in the cutscenes. Because of this, Wesel is only killed for failing to assassinate Padme, she is not killed because she was about to give her partners name. Also, because there is no dialogue, it is never mentioned that Boba Fett is an unaltered clone, so I also removed the quotation marks. The link below is a YouTube video that contains the cutscenes for these segments so you can see for yourself. If I broke some WP guidelines by reverting or by placing the link below, respond here, or on my talk page. OcelotCreeper (talk) 14:18, 13 March 2020 (UTC) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dshjCdjzc9E[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot revert changes and simply cite your own opinions. You must reach a consensus in the Talk page before making changes. 2605:B100:D3C:1431:1418:ACF6:FCE4:7CCD (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The chucky doll edits are vandalism so im removing it GameEnd (talk) 18:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GameEnd, thanks for your antivandalism work. You had previously been informed about Help:Reverting, a page that explains how to properly revert multiple successive edits without having to use multiple "undo"s. Can you confirm that you have seen this advice? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain your revert, please? 73.71.251.64 (talk) 18:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

well it's notable around the world because it most likely inspired the 2021 Capitol Storming and it was said by the President's lawyer. GameEnd (talk) 18:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The public coverage is not disputed, but it isn't the goal of Wikipedia to create a concordance of phrase usage. If he had been moving before a court (as some have in recent years) that would be different. 73.71.251.64 (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Are this 2 links Book Mimic - A Variation on the Iconic D&D Monster and Splinter Mimic - An Interpretation of the Iconic D&D Monster good for the D&D related articles? Cheers my friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.96.48.252 (talk) 08:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think anyone is going to give you a hard time, but I don't think your reverts on Hartley Sawyer are exempt from 3RR. Might want to let someone else pick up the slack. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok. GameEnd (talk) 15:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't take that as a warning or anything, clearly the person is editing against consensus while there's an active RFC on the talk page. Just wouldn't want to see you get caught up because of a technical violation. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. GameEnd (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same with Zac Cini. I appreciate the help, but the edit is not vandalism or something like that, so it's a matter of editorial judgment. The IP is wrong, but don't revert any more. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok GameEnd (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GameEnd. Thanks for your valiant efforts combating the Redditor's onslaught against Josh fight. I noticed that you have a short message that you type to the vandals, but I'd liek to offer you a way to significantly speed up this process. There is a life-saving tool called RedWarn that allows you to revert an edit with a single click. It also automatically generates the edit summary depending on which option you choose (vandalism, promo, edit war, etc.). Not only does it do those things, but it also allows you, with another click, to give an auto-generated message to them depending on the circumstance. It will truly save you loads of time in reverting vandalism, and has other features as well, which is why I highly recommend it. You can install the script by clicking here. Tell me if you have any questions! Thanks, EDG 543 ^{(message me)} 15:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of a page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 2605:B100:10A:B96C:54F9:48B1:3E50:D9FB (talk) 17:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The french governemnt doesn't want to fight, so techinally, they are not on the side of the fishers. GameEnd (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is Doriden, this guy keeps on vandalizing the Newark Fire Department Wikipedia page, I undid it twice and I know that you did as well today. How can we get him blocked? His address is in Florida. I wrote to him twice but he doesn't seem to get it. Please help me out, you have more experience than me with Wikipedia. Thank you Doriden (talk) 21:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mean to just template and run, but sometimes a warning template stops a vandal. It always makes it easier to block a vandal who doesn't stop. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok, got it. GameEnd (talk) 16:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely recommend WP:TW to help automate those edits. Others use WP:HUGGLE. Thanks for the good work. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GameEnd, as previously requested multiple times, please familiarize yourself with the procedures described at Help:Reverting to properly undo multiple edits at once. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is Doriden. He did it again. Disruptive editing. Please help me get him blocked, at least temporarily. Thank you, Doriden Doriden (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Game end, we were reverting it at the same time, I was doing it manually. I have tried talking to him several times but it doesn't seem to sink in. He's in St.Pete Florida. We have to get him blocked for disruptive editing, at least temporarily. You seem to have more experience with Wikipedia than me. Can we try to get it done? Thanks, Doriden Doriden (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GameEnd! I'm Ed6767, a developer for RedWarn. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to try RedWarn, a new modern and user friendly tool specifically designed to improve your counter-vandalism experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by nearly six hundred other Wikipedians on the English Wikipedia and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor.

It's easy to get started with RedWarn. Unlike other anti-vandalism programs, it only takes a moment to get started. There's no setup or download. It runs on Windows, macOS, Chrome OS, Linux and more, and can be installed and used by any autoconfirmed user.

Installing RedWarn is risk-free and only takes a minute, and you can uninstall it at any time. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install and use it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on RedWarn's talk page at WT:RW. Your feedback is much appreciated! ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 18:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok. GameEnd (talk) 18:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He just did it again, we have to have him blocked Doriden (talk) 21:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me out by reporting this guy for disruptive behavior. He has several ip addresses all in St.Petersburg Florida. I have talked to him more than several times but he insists on doing what he wants. I would greatly appreciate your help. I am not very computer savvy. Please help me out. Thanks, Doriden Doriden (talk) 21:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is Doriden. The page Protection of the Newark NJ fire dept Wikipedia page was reversed by a BOT and 2 hours later that ip address from Florida did it again. Can we get him blocked at least temporarily. Disruptive editing. Please help me out. Thanks, Doriden Doriden (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting the Joe Bostic page. That page is entirely incorrect. Just trying to fill in a complete wiki for my dad. Mbostic1775 (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a conflict of interest with you editing the page. GameEnd (talk) 18:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not doing vandalism! I am adding the info because it is correct! The pandas left in 2020 and they replaced them with gibbons and he tapir do trust me and do not remove it! Thanks! 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 18:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No source of ref and you keep adding it when it keeps getting removed. GameEnd (talk) 18:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing it because this is the truth are you a bot or a real person can you google calgary zoo gibbons because it is correct? Thanks! 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to put the source/ref in the article. GameEnd (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added the information with a proper ref. Please take a look at WP:BRD for next time. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have also added the info that the pandas were sent back to China with a ref to CNN. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You. GameEnd (talk) 20:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening, that guy who was doing persistent disruptive editing on military and fire Department pages is back and doing the same nonsense. His old ip address is blocked for a year because I complained about it. Now 172.58.188.128 he is using. Wugapodes and Oshwah helped block him last time but it's good for more than one person complains about it. Please contact both of them on their talk page. Take a look at this guys new nonsense too. Same subject matter and subjects. Thank you, Doriden (talk) 02:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:176.92.20.227. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop that nonsense. You are not achieving anything; you're only making more work for other people. Drmies (talk) 23:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh sorry. GameEnd (talk) 23:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop. User:Chris troutman warned you about this, and pointed you to the applicable guideline, two years ago already. Drmies (talk) 23:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is entitled to blank their Talk page. Please stop reverting them. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, won't happen again. GameEnd (talk) 23:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was just going to say the same thing. You violated the 3RR rule per WP:NOTWALLOFSHAME. Just a note. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 23:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]