Welcome Ford-nixon!

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Claudius Gele, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. See WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "you're welcome" button so: you're welcome :P Jackninja5 (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FordDixon,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether List of controversial celebrity baby names should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of controversial celebrity baby names .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Jayakumar RG (talk) 06:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Colton Tran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not yet seem to be notable, no major roles, his "biggest" being a "supporting role" in a cable TV kids movie.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Now there may be a case for notability, but I'm not seeing it, and as a BLP, I don't want him getting vandalized.Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:07, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That creation, for whatever reason, is truly inspired. I salute you. As you may know, Joachim von Sandrart is the sole source for Lorrain's youthful pastry work, though I'd love to know when and where the 1645 pastry puff invention idea came from. In the mid-19th century many got balled up over the fact that the Latin translation of Sandrart's work somehow translated the german "Pasteten-Becken" into "pictori cuidam artocreatum" (painter of pies, which is confusing to say the least).--Milowent • ^hasspoken 19:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Alex Anthopoulos. Thank you. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 19:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 11 Things You Did Not and Will Not Learn in School, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://business.illinois.edu/broker/eleven.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FordDixon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 11 Things You Did Not and Will Not Learn in School for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 15:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bill Gates may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Good About Themselves But Can't Read, Write, or Add|accessdate=November 11, 2014}}</ref> <ref>{[citeweb|url=http://business.illinois.edu/broker/eleven.htm|title=Eleven Things You'll never learn
• broker/eleven.htm|title=Eleven Things You'll never learn in school|accessdate=November 11, 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Top 10 Heisman Trophy winners in the NFL requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just thought I'd explain why so many of your pages are getting deleted since I don't see where anyone has tried to explain why this is happening. The problem is that in some instances, as in the case of the Top 10 Heisman Trophy winners in the NFL article, it was because the page was ultimately a re-write of a post/article on the NFL site and even if we ignore the whole WP:COPYVIO thing, the page would still fail overall notability guidelines because it's ultimately an WP:INDISCRIMINATE list. Even if I'd chosen to not delete it as a very closely paraphrased article, it still would have been deleted at WP:AfD. Now when it comes to the article 11 Things You Did Not and Will Not Learn in School, that was deleted as promotion because it came across as a promotional article for Bill Gates. The statement "If you agree, pass it on. If you can read this - Thank a teacher!" especially came across as promotional. The NFL article had the same issue to a certain extent. The Gates article had the same issue to where even if the deleting administrator chose to decline the speedy deletion, it still would have been deleted at AfD because of the same reason. The only time something can really pass through the whole "indiscriminate list" or "random thing someone said once" type of barrier is if the list is especially well covered in reliable sources like newspapers, TV shows, books, and the like. I don't see where either of these lists meet notability guidelines.

Both articles were written in such a casual manner that they came across (at worst) as a promotional article or (at best) like something a fan would write on their blog. Wikipedia isn't really a place for random thoughts or articles written on a blog post or random speech unless those things have received a LOT of coverage in reliable sources. You've posted other articles that fall under the same guidelines: they're ultimately just lists or fairly random information that has some link to someone or something famous, but still fall under what Wikipedia is WP:NOT. These are the types of articles that would be fine on a personal blog, but not so much on Wikipedia. I think that your heart is in the right place, but I would recommend reading over the page at WP:NOT pretty thoroughly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:20, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Moos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenneth Acker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FordDixon. I've started a discussion over the article you recently created, 2014-15 F1 Financial Crisis, over at the Formula One WikiProject talk page. You are welcome to contribute over at the discussion page. Thanks. QueenCake (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article F1 Financial Crisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F1 Financial Crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QueenCake (talk) 00:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

F1 Financial Crisis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:41, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. For the reasons discussed previously, this has been moved back to a draft: Draft:F1_financial_crisis. I would encourage you to work with the people at WP:Wikiproject Formula One to bring this to a satisfactory conclusion. Cheers, --LukeSurl ^{t c} 10:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you can see the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Recreation_of_a_deleted_article where I was asked to put it back as a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:GerardLopez.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The³5₉ (Talk) 06:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FordDixon. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "F1 financial crisis".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dallas Lewallen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Lewallen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]