Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Infectious disease (medical specialty) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Infectious disease (medical specialty) was changed by Flow234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2016-03-27T23:09:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pacific Sea. Since you had some involvement with the Pacific Sea redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 23:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Flow234/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333-blue 23:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Flow234, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333-blue 23:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NO-PREEMPT. We do not protect if the pages are somehow "equivalent"; we protect according to the level of disruption on each page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Parsley Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Parsley Man (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

19:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

20:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

19:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Flow234! A fellow editor reverted your edit to Levofloxacin because you didn't provide a source (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). I've added one in the meantime, but please note that adding sources to your edits is important for the quality of Wikipedia, because otherwise our readers can't check whether the information we provide is actually true. Therefore, unsourced content is likely to be deleted sooner or later. Happy editing, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 09:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

20:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

18:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

19:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

18:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello User:Flow234, Thank you very much for all of your contributions to Wikipedia. This is regarding your reverting my edits for using transliteration template ISO. In the spirit of working together for building this encyclopedia, could you please add details about the issues with this template that you are experiencing? And reporting the bug. Kindly see note at talkpage for Tamil language, using transliteration template- ISO. Thanks, 2know4power (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

19:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

23:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

15:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello Flow234, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of King Hussein Business Park, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: speedy deletion requires that *all* revisions meet the criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. SoWhy 10:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

14:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion regarding Tissot. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to). I noticed you added a promo tag to the Tissot page - I had just removed that tag about a month ago, after overhauling the article and removing much promotional language and content. I do not see what you are referring to as being promotional, so I have removed the tag. I implore you to make the edits to remove what you view as promotional yourself in lieu of adding a blanket tag, as it would be much more helpful for everyone. Thanks, Garchy (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

QuackGuru (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iliza Shlesinger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeform. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 11:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WCSH, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearst. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

22:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

19:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

15:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

23:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

This user opposes copyright, and encourages the free exchange of culture.

to discover this user box on your user page after you challenged the Joe Arpio signature that I discovered in a book. Carptrash (talk) 15:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Well this is not an infringement because Joe Arpio, (who is big in the news in the USA even as we write, just pardoned by the Big Cheese) signed the book after it was copyrighted. Does that make sense to you? Carptrash (talk) 21:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense so your right i admit i was wrong

Thank you, but there is no need to say you are "sorry", no need to admit that you were wrong because (opinion) this is not a "right or wrong" scenario. Trump (another opinion) pardoning Arpio is wrong. For that we will get no "sorry." Carptrash (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

22:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

19:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi. You will often find blocks of IP addresses without a published rationale. These are generally blocks of clearly identified indeff block/ban evaders. It is part of our method of ignoring them in the hope of them going away. In the case of some, it doesn't work. They are also often what we call 'IP hoppers'. Leaving messages on IP users' talk pages has no effect as they don't read them, and there is no other way they can be contacted even if we wanted to. Their posts are a mix of slanderous attacks at admins, disruption of RfC, and the rare useful edit to an article. When we find them we remove them all. The only real solution would be to insist that all users register an account. Wikipedia is the only serious web site nowadays that does not have this requirement. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

• Cozy1626 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Whova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Thanks for reviewing the article. I was informed that it was declined after 3 weeks since I submitted. I'd like to revise it based on your advice. Would you please let me know what exactly were considered as promotional materials, or what sources are unreliable among the references? I posted it on the help desk, and they suggested to contact you directly.

It seems someone already deleted the draft even I started a talk page and said I will revise this. How can I get the draft back? Thanks.

Cozy1626 (talk) 16:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flow234 As a relatively new beginner to Wikipedia, I would really appreciate any specific suggestions you may have as to how I could improve the content of the Draft page 'Newcastle and Hunter Valley Speleological Society' which you had declined. Specifically what sections should be deleted or added to. I have spent many many hours researching this article, so hope that my efforts have not been totally wasted. Besides looking more critically at what can be misinterpreted as advertisement (which none of the article is intended to be), how do I go forward from here? Now that the Draft article has been marked as "Declined", what is the procedure to get this banner removed? Happy to take on board your suggestion. Kind RegardsIntoCaves (talk) 00:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

23:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Since K-popguardian created the page with a copy-and-paste move, I merged the draft you declined into List of dead South Korean musicians. At first glance, the sourcing issue appears addressed. Of course, feel free to prod or nominate for AfD if you think the article is fatally flawed. —C.Fred (talk) 20:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely it will be an AfD, but if there is any major problems, notify me and I will try my best to fix it.-K-popguardian (talk) 20:43, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

18:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

00:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

18:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)